The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[hansvonlieven]

@ Bill

Good one LOL

Hans

[chrisC]

Dear Tinselkoala,

......
A number of Universities have been contacted.  They may do Experiment001 to Experiment005 also.

You have absolutely no idea how university research works! Do you think university research departments are like Hong Kong sweat shops where you can ask them to do a 'dry run' and if you're happy with their results you will proceed to hire them? Who in the world wants to deal with a delusional dork?

Just like you believed the Obama goverment will be so thrill to receive the Lee-Tseung crap? Are you seriously silly or are you really a nut?

cheers
chrisC

[utilitarian]

You have absolutely no idea how university research works! Do you think university research departments are like Hong Kong sweat shops where you can ask them to do a 'dry run' and if you're happy with their results you will proceed to hire them? Who in the world wants to deal with a delusional dork?

Just like you believed the Obama goverment will be so thrill to receive the Lee-Tseung crap? Are you seriously silly or are you really a nut?

cheers
chrisC

One thing I think you have to understand about all this, and Lawrence has admitted this himself, is that his posts are not really intended as a discussion with us.  He has this idea in his head that important people (sucker investors?) are reading this forum.  So everything he writes is slanted this way.  He is playing to his imaginary audience, and he will typically ignore anything that does not provide a platform for him to just push more of the same propaganda.  This is why he uses multiple personae.  So he can feed himself questions, but still have the forum sort of appear like a discussion board.

Also, I think that Lawrence lies constantly.  So asking question like this is pointless.  Lawrence knows that sending unsolicited requests to universities, asking to do reactionless propulsion experiments that were already declared failures 100 years ago is pointless, just like he knows that sending emails to the Obama campaign is pointless.  He knows there is no flying saucer and he knows there is no lead-out motor.  He is lying.  But this is the most incompetent scam I have ever encountered.

[chrisC]

One thing I think you have to understand about all this, and Lawrence has admitted this himself, is that his posts are not really intended as a discussion with us.  He has this idea in his head that important people (sucker investors?) are reading this forum.  So everything he writes is slanted this way.  He is playing to his imaginary audience, and he will typically ignore anything that does not provide a platform for him to just push more of the same propaganda.  This is why he uses multiple personae.  So he can feed himself questions, but still have the forum sort of appear like a discussion board.

Also, I think that Lawrence lies constantly.  So asking question like this is pointless.  Lawrence knows that sending unsolicited requests to universities, asking to do reactionless propulsion experiments that were already declared failures 100 years ago is pointless, just like he knows that sending emails to the Obama campaign is pointless.  He knows there is no flying saucer and he knows there is no lead-out motor.  He is lying.  But this is the most incompetent scam I have ever encountered.

I think you're right. There's no question that Lawrence knows the difference between what is right and what is wrong. That said, it's totally inconceivable to me at least that someone in their 60's goes through such lengths to try 'impress' on whatever 'investors' he attempts to convince on this Forum; knowing full well that almost 100% (personas excluded) thinks he's an idiot!

I tried months ago at least to equate him with a John Nash personality (A Beautiful Mind movie). Maybe Lawrence has something real? But then, I cannot equate Lawrence's crap to John Nash's brilliance even though John Nash was really mentally sick and he couldn't help himself. Tseung is not sick, he is deluded and certainly not a smart con man!

cheers
chrisC

[Pirate88179]

chrisc:

John Nash, mental problems aside, was indeed a brilliant man.  The movie was ok but let me tell you the book (as usual) was very, very good.  I listen to audio books when out on an assignment and I have listened to this one twice. I highly recommend it to anyone.

I too have considered if Lawrence actually has something in his theory.  I guess that is still possible but when I see such basic fundamental mathematical and physics mistakes (they have to be fundamental for me to catch them) in some of his responses, I really doubt there is any validity to it.

Hans was the one that disproved Lawrence's "one way valve" experiment since he had some expertise in this area.  From there, I think the theory has gone down hill.

Even if Lawrence does have some mental problems, hell, we all probably do to some degree, I would still look at any real experimental "proofs" with an open mind.....Heck, I would even hope he is correct.  I have not seen that yet, and, sad to say, probably never will.  I guess time will tell.

Bill                   PS Hey why don't we get mythbusters (yes, those idiots) to test the theory?