The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[nievesoliveras]

@nievesoliveras
I think you're too much into Tseung's thread. You really think he knows this stuff?
It'll be like asking to borrow a comb from a bald headed Franciscan monk!

For a better explanation, you can see Harti's writeup

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6829.msg159035;topicseen#msg159035

cheers
chrisC

Thank you @chrisc !

Jesus

[ltseung888]

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6829.msg159056#msg159056

I think I now have a very good idea, how it can work.

Have a look at the following picture.

I borrowed a picture from JL. Naudin´s coil research and modified it.

Dr. Altmann uses pretty big diameter sized permanent magnets.

So if he has 2 coils on the spool, one with a very large turn number coil
with fine wire size and
one very low turn coil with bigger wire diameter,it is a perfect solution.

Now see the induction voltage from the picture when we use a graetz
bridge rectifier on the large turn coil.
This will generate quite a nice induction voltage into a cap after the graetz bridge.

So an incoming rotating magnet can charge up a 100 nF cap behind the graetz bridge probably to
around a few Volts already.
Now comes the tricky part.
To get a good repelling pulse, we have to use the whole cap energy
and have to discharge it in a short amount of time into the second
low turn coil which will be wired in repelling mode.
This can be done by a voltage comparator circuit, in the simplest form
of a zenerdiode to fire the transistor or FET to discharge the cap energy storage
into the low turn number second coil.
As this second coil has a low ohmical resistance the current buildup
is really quick and thus there willbe flowing probably at least an amp
in a few milliseconds for a short period of time, which will
generate a pretty strong repelling magnet field...

So all in all this circuit might work pretty well and it is not so mysterious as
it looks.
It just depends of the 2 coils, what the high turn number coil can generate for an induction voltage
into the cap and then how this stored energy can best be used to repell the passing magnet.
As the magnet is pretty wide in diameter, it is still in the transit, when the cap is already charged after
the pulses from the scopeshot, so coil 2 can still repell it with some force.

So maybe if we make the magnet still wider or use 2 magnets side by side,
the repelling force will be much better, as there will be still enough magnet surface there after
the voltage spikes,so all depends on the setup of the magnets and the coils to each other.
It could also be beneficail to have the 2 coils not on the same spool but to have them side by
side, so the first high turn coil can charge up the cap and then the second low turn
coil can fire the repelling pulse, when it is exactly top dead center over it.

The trick is really to use 2 different turn number coils, as there is the induction voltage
difference of a high turn coil versus a low turn coil, which is okay to charge up the cap.

Regards, Stefan.

Dear Stefan,

Excellent job.

Two teams from our side of the World (Hong Kong and China) will take up the experimental testing.  They are also experimenting with the pulse DC circuits with program control.

The theory is similar.  When a magnet is attracted to a stationary coil, it will increase in velocity.  If the coil suddenly lost it magnetism when the magnet is at the highest velocity, the magnet will not be attracted back.  If the coil suddenly changes polarity, the repulsion will further push the magnet away.

One obvious technique is the use of Pulse Current which has beed successfully demonstrated in the Newman, Bedini, Adams and the 225 HP Pulse Motor.

This Dr. Altmann technique of using two coils and a transistor to do the equivalent is a great teaching tool.  It may not lead-out as much energy as the Pulse Current technique but it helps in the understanding.

Please continue your brilliant work.  We have learned much from you et al.  The World benefits because of your tireless efforts.

[Pirate88179]

Geeze, now Stefan's work is also a result of the Lead Out theory?  I'll bet that is news to him.  Lawrence, again, with all due respect, I think you are going a little too far here.

Bill

[chrisC]

Geeze, now Stefan's work is also a result of the Lead Out theory?  I'll bet that is news to him.  Lawrence, again, with all due respect, I think you are going a little too far here.

Bill

As usual old Tseung has shown himself too quick to take the credit for how marvelous this Lee-Tseung mumbo jumbo theory is to the world and every O.U device must have his crap theory embedded behind it. And now he proposes not one but TWO teams to confirm this OU design.

But lo and behold, Mr. Starcross finally told us a couple of hours on YouTube this Lego machine was just a trick. Haha! What a dork Mr. Tseung suddenly looks like now! You really are very silly!

http://www.youtube.com/user/Starcross42

Lawrence, you definitely need to learn 'O' level Physics and take your medication!

cheers
chrisC

[Pirate88179]

@ Chris:

Yes, I believe the word "Hoax" is appropriate here.

Bill