The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

The Feedback Mechanism

The following diagram shows the proposed feedback mechanism.

We know that
1. we can achieve overunity.  The AC Power Output can be greater than Input.
2. We can vary the Output AC voltage by different arrangement of the Collector Coils.
3. We can convert the Output AC to DC.  If the votage is greater than 12 V, we can recharge the 12 V battery.
4. We can vary the load to draw out different energy and achieve the correct Pulsing Frequency.
5. There is a possibility that we can even remove the battery!

How exciting.  Many thanks to the Divine One.

*** As illustrated, the battery will also drive the load unless the switch is Open.  That give us the incentive to try harder.
*** There will be no possibility of DOUBT if the device runs after the swirch is open or if the battery is removed!

[markdansie]

@FreeEnergy,
I ran babblefish translatter over your text and found it was a rare form of anciet dialect. In it contained not only the solution to the Unification Theory but a clear step by step guide to an overunity device.
It also contained eplicit instructions how to conect with the Devine One who has recently taken residence up in China.
Well done
Mark

[TheDivineOne]

How exciting.  Many thanks to the Divine One.

*** There will be no possibility of DOUBT if the device runs after the swirch is open or if the battery is removed!

You're welcome.

[Paul-R]

@ Paul R
"In the the end what actually counts is what the user has to pay"

Thats easy to work out in this case $150,000HK

When you do your homework, and understand the significance of the winners of the
1957 Nobel Physics prize, you will be on the bottom rung of the ladder.

Until then, you are a tosser.

[markdansie]

@ Paul-R
call me a Tosser, I am sure you can do better than that.
See the problem you have is everything you believe in is based on speculation, delusional people or just scam artists. I welcome the day I am proved wrong and indeed a breakthough will be made. I want to be proved wrong. Until then, well given what we know and can demonstrate you have no case for your arguments.
I am just wondering if personally you will be attending the course in China. Nothing like putting your money behind your belief systems.
On the other hand I encourage everyone to keep up there good work and expand the field of understanding we have. many good people are doing some great work in these forums and should be encouraged. What makes it hard for them are the ones who make claims that can not be supported or are just con men. Unfortunately everyone gets tared with the same brush.
have I supported inventors before financially ...yes and lost my money, but in doing so I knew the risk to begin with and hold no grudge. The sad side of my existence is the many times I have had to break the news after testing devices that they have nothing.
I have an interest in several projects. Most do not make the forums or have only made Brief appearances. I am a believer a breakthrough may come one day.
I guess the most exciting thing I am finding is the costs of solar and many other technologies will be so low soon that they will be affordable. The big breakthrough in battery technologies i believe is veryclose with some excellent research being done. I can purchase solar panels now for sub $2 per watt. With government subsidies they are very affordable.
So I will continue my journey of sorting the bad from the good, and will never compromise on asking questions and challenging outlandish claims. Part of my reason of doing this is to protect the gullable. I have seen families lose their life savings investing in Free Energy devices promoted by either con men or delusional people.
PS has anyone pre paid for their magnacoaster yet?
Ant why do I challenge the author (many authors if you count all his ID here)of this thread. Its simple, appart form the entertainment value, and I do applaud his efforts, he is now attempting to fleece many thousands of dollars form gullible people.
I have one more question Mr Paul R. Do you think he should offer a money back guarantee, given it has never been tested to acceptable standards?
I will always defend your right Paul-R to express your opinion and offer your opinion on me. But I also in that defence claim the right of reply. I would only suggest you be more imaginative with your words.
as usual
Kind Regards
Mark