The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Pirate88179]

I, for one, am not a figment of Lawrence's imagination.  I exist.  I really do. I am beginning to wonder if Lawrence is not but a figment of our imaginations? (Mass hallucination?)


Bill "As far as I know I am really here" Ellis

[shruggedatlas]

I, for one, am not a figment of Lawrence's imagination.  I exist.  I really do. I am beginning to wonder if Lawrence is not but a figment of our imaginations? (Mass hallucination?)

Bill "As far as I know I am really here" Ellis

A well-conceived figment would fight for the reality of its existence, so your strenuous insistence means nothing.  Although I am a figment too, so what do I know.

[Devil]

Let it be known to all the uninformed Forum Members,

Ben Waballs, Koen1, Hans von Lieven, Entropy, pirate88179, ChrisC, shruggedatlas, President Bush, Hilary Clinton, Forever, Devil, God etc are all virtual creations of Tseung.  They do not exist in reality.  USA never killed, tortured an Iraqi, and never got a drop of Iraqi Oil.

There is no such thing as Flying Saucers.  There is no Nanjing or Area 51.  Whatever observed are mass illusions.  The Physics of parallelogram of forces, vector arithmetic, air as energy carrier, etc are all lies.  Adding air to water will not dilute its density and the resulting column height will be the same.  Hans with his 40 years experience confirmed that.  There is no need for experiments.  Tseung cooked everything up.

There is no need to do the water-bottle experiment or the Scottish 22 pound hammer toss.  Koen1 in his infinite wisdom could lean back and ignore the angular momentum, torque and the complexity of non-rigid body motion.  He can be the professor to dictate knowledge to the World.

Lawrence Tseung
It looks like the devil is the only worthwhile challenger in this Forum.

Tseung, you should be a role model of honesty ? speaking the truth, nothing but the truth.  Leave the clearing of the ring to me.  I can insult any one.  My name speaks for itself.

Now let me talk about your reply 1112.  The first part is shown in the attached figure (1112 explained.jpg)

In U-tube A, the oil level is higher than that of water because of the density difference.  At level 2, the pressure of water must be the same. 

In U-tube B, the Air+Water level (if you can keep it that way) will be higher than that of water alone because of the density difference. 

In U-tube C, the addition of the one-way valves will raise the Air+Water column to an even higher level.  The reasons are: (a) more air can be added (b) the one-way valves ?insulate? the pressure from the top.

It is obvious that U-tube C can support a higher Air+Water column.  There is no magic and nothing more than high school physics.

In the second part, you introduced the concept that air is a mechanical energy carrier.  Energy carried = Volume x Pressure.  The proof is also simple physics understood by Physics Students at Universities.  Some of the carried energy can be used to do work.  The work is shown as increased height ? even higher than U-tube C.

If you try (a) to get water at the raised height to flow down to do work; (b) generate electricity to the air pump and (c) hope to have a self running system, you are nuts.  The efficiency of such arrangement is extremely low (or loss of energy is high).  You are unlikely to succeed even if you manage to build a very tall tower.

You are very cunning.  You give the task to someone else.  You can already claim a useful invention ? transporting water to a greater height with less energy.  However, your invention is practically useless because of water hammering.  (When there is air in water pipes, there might be movement of the water shaking or rocking the pipes.)

Tseung, the top guns in Area 51 may give you credit for this useless invention.  You might get a mention in some textbooks.  But that is far from fame and fortune.

[ltseung888]

Dear Devil,

Wow.  You do understand Physics.

Reply 1112 is indeed stupid if we were to use it as an electricity generator.

Please comment on the attached Clem Motor.

[Devil]

Tseung, you can get more information about the Richard Clem Motor in

http://keelynet.com/energy/clem3.htm

The theory behind it is elementary.

(1)   The Axle is horizontal.  The cone shaped structure will extract gravitational energy on rotation.  The Liang IC Pulsed Cylinder is also horizontal.  The power is 188 horsepower with a weight of 28 kg.  The Clem engine was 350 horsepower with a weight of 90 kg.  The Liang engine is superior to the Clem engine in this respect.

(2)   The rest of the Clem engine is just a closed system.  It requires a starting engine to achieve the required operational speed.  (The Liang engine also requires that.)

(a)   A company called Creative Sciences (http://www.fuellesspower.com) is selling plans ($60) for what they claim is a machine that generates 1500hp and runs by itself. They call this a CEACU and claim it was released by a 70 year old retired scientist.

(b)   With regard to differences between the CEACU design and Clem the CEACU does not require the cone, but instead uses a thick disk with nozzles on the outer edge. A hollow shaft feeds water into this disk at a high velocity.  As the water exits from the nozzles, the disk spins giving an ever higher velocity. A 3200 psi air tank is used to get the disk spinning to 1000 rpm when it is claimed to begin to run on its own. There are other ways to achieve this velocity beyond 3200 psi as you can well imagine.

The KeelyNet and Creative Sciences people totally missed the boat.  They were looking for the magic in the workings of the engine.  The actual source of energy is from the rotation of the cone or disk leading out gravitational energy.  Any stupid closed loop system can do the trick.