The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

Right on point Sean

I have been saying basically the same thing for some time now, but the massage seems to fall on deaf ears.

.....
To quote a famous philosopher...

'A good horse trader always keeps his best horse in the barn.'  - JD Clampett

...

All well and point taken. Old Tseung will get more respect if he really has a horse in the barn. It looks like that horse is really a 'donkey'!

And that's why the crowd here is full of contempt. And can you blame them?

cheers

chrisC

[ltseung888]

Translation of the presentation of Slide 10 in the dry run.

Tseung: " In Slide 10, we have a simple pendulum or swing.  There are two forces on this system.  The first one is the weight - 60 units in this case.  The other is the tension of the string (T).  In the stationary state, these two forces must be equal.  This means T is also 60 units."

Pause.

Tseung: "If one can only exert a force of 10 units, one cannot lift the pendulum bob.  However, if one pulls the bob horizontally with the 10 unit force horizontally, the bob will be dispaced both horizontally and vertically."

[ltseung888]

Translation of presentation slide 11.

Tseung: "Let us apply the Law of Parallelogram of Forces to analyze this system.  Most of you have studied this Law in Physics in Secondary School.  Let us assume that the bob has been displaced and remains in the new displaced position.  In this case, there are three forces at equilibrium.  These three forces are: the horizontal force F which is still 10 units; the weight of the bob which is still 60 units and the tension of the string T1.  T1 can be calculated via the vector arithmetic or the parallelogram of forces.  It is equal to the diagonal of the parallelogram formed by the two vectors Mg and T.?

Tseung: ?At equilibrium, the angle of the string is ?a?.  Tan(a) = F/Mg = 10/60.  Thus in this case, the angle ?a? is 9.46 degrees.  This is strictly mathematics and cannot be wrong.  T1 can then be accurately calculated to be 60.84 units.?

The spreadsheet file is available for anyone who wants to do the checking.

[ltseung888]

Translation of presentation slide 12.

Tseung: "Once we have the forces, we can find out the work done by these forces.  Work = Force x Displacement.?

Refer to the diagram.  Assume the Length of the Pendulum is L.

Tseung: ?The horizontal displacement is dX.  The value is Lsin(a) or Lsin(9.46).  The vertical displacement is dH. The value is L-Y or L(1-cos(9.46))?

Tseung: ?Since we know the displacements, we can calculate the work done in the horizontal and in the vertical directions.  The horizontal work done = F x Lsin(9.46).  The vertical work done = Mg x L(1-cos(9.46)).  We can use the value of F = 10 and Mg = 60 in our calculation.  Work done = Energy spent in Physics.  Thus the (horizontal energy / vertical energy) can be calculated to be 2.014.  The value of L is cancelled out and thus no assumed value is needed.?

Pause.

Tseung: ?The ratio of 2.014 is extremely significant.  It means 2.014 parts of horizontal energy can Lead Out 1 unit of vertical energy.  The horizontal energy is supplied by my pull.  The vertical energy is supplied by the tension of the string which is effectively the energy from gravity.  I spend approximately 2 units of energy.  Gravity supplies 1 unit of energy.  These 3 units of energy goes into the pulled pendulum system.?

Lee: ?This is a simplified analysis for the average scientist.  We also have a more exact version using Integrals for discussion with Physicists or Mathematicians who want to dig really deep.?

The spreadsheet for the more exact ideal Lee-Tseung pull is also available for those who are interested.

[ltseung888]

Feedback on the presentation of the 3 slides 10-12 at the dry run.

(1)   I never expect the mathematics to be so simple.  It can be understood by the average secondary school student who has studied physics or vector arithmatic.

(2)   Great theories are often simple.  Newton got his inspiration from a falling apple.

(3)   I need to dig deep into the spreadsheets before commenting.  The consequence of Leading Out energy is too great.  I want no mistakes.

(4)   Some may not accept the theory now.  However, there are many New Energy Inventions that can be explained by this theory.  The inventors could not get their inventions accepted even though they have working prototypes.  The major objection is that their inventions are the impossible perpetual motion machines that violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.

(5)   If Gravitational Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration or rotations, why are we using fossil fuel?  This is definitely worth further research.

We shall get the feedback from the actual seminar within the next 48 hours.  It should be fun.  The live videos will be available.