Newman machine with a closed loop selfrunning without batteries or solar panels

[Ray0energy]

if an independent source could confirm Newman's claims, that may mean something.  The people he claims have validated it are not available for comment.  Warning flags go off with him having claimed for years to have it and nothing is really there.  The demo's are laughable.  I have some stories from people who feel they were ripped off by Newman at
www.phact.org/e/skeptic/newman.htm

here is one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u__1Zu9zGvc

and here is it on a 5watt solar panel NO Battery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GneVcyie4X8

[erickrieg]

I'm sorry, but this is no more significant than Newman's last 30 years of work.  It is just a motor - it does not have a real load.  It is just adding up high voltage spikes into a capacitor bank.  But the light bulb (which can not be powered by such small batteries) only glows a second .  This is Under Unity.  Were it possible to get over unity, one would just make the thing run with only caps and no batteries at all.  more info on newman at
www.phact.org/e/skeptic/newman.htm

if anyone would make real over unity, they would have more than enough smarts to do the obvious far more simple step of supplying all needed input power from excess output power.

[kmarinas86]

I'm sorry, but this is no more significant than Newman's last 30 years of work.  It is just a motor - it does not have a real load.  It is just adding up high voltage spikes into a capacitor bank.  But the light bulb (which can not be powered by such small batteries) only glows a second .  This is Under Unity.  Were it possible to get over unity, one would just make the thing run with only caps and no batteries at all.  more info on newman at
www.phact.org/e/skeptic/newman.htm

if anyone would make real over unity, they would have more than enough smarts to do the obvious far more simple step of supplying all needed input power from excess output power.

Claims of overunity are like claims that you can light a forest up with just one flaming match. The ultimate problem is this, "CAN YOU GET ENERGY FROM ATOMS OR MOLECULES?" If the answer is "NO", then the circuit will behave as real EE's expect. But if you get energy from such sources, the results may be confused with "overunity", thereby turning off mainstream engineers' and scientists' curiosity of the device.

[Ray0energy]

looks like eric you are negative for all overunity things i looked eric's posts only negative thins on all topics.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=profile;u=43;sa=showPosts

i don't want answer from you. i want answer from other users what they opinion about Newman motor.

u just say it.
this forum is not ware i was looking for here it is more a SKEPTIC VS believer 
and not about sharing info and findings of real experiments

it is a bit like discussion room ware there is a ferry loud radio in the back 

my rating for this forum is a 5-

c u later wen there is les bla bla and more experiment wit multimeters and oscilloscopes!!!!!!


ITS IN YOUR HANDS NOT IN THE BOOKS!!!!!

and totally not on discovery channel

[Ray0energy]

DECEMBER 2007

SPEED IS POWER
Speed is very important in a collision.
If you double the speed of a car,
you increase its force of impact four times.
If you triple the speed, the impact is nine times as great.

Accordingly, the Newman Energy Machine in principle
produces unlimited speed: unlimited power!

Above is the latest addition to the newman website just that no more no less which means no links, wow speed is power we understand what your on about joe lets see some action.

Well ok.  Let's see.

If you keep the resistance held, then power is proportional to current squared.  This is when you keep the same coil, not the same voltage.  If you want to get the most power out of 9V battery, then you use commutators to make the voltage of the wire go up and down as often as possible, because when ever the connection is not there, you are not using the voltage.  So basically, if you want to build more for you money, its best to at least double the number of commutator hits per rotation, and if doing so doubles the current, it will will quadruple the power, while only halving the longevity of the battery, so overall you get twice the energy output.  If instead of increasing the number of commutator touches you connect two 9V in series, keep in mind that the 9V batteries have a resistance of their own, so you won't be able to double the current that way.  Copper wire has resistance measured in ohms per kilometer, whereas a 9V battery may have several ohms.  You would also be eating up the batteries faster that way, not good for longevity.  Believe it or not, if your motor touches the commutator for long, then you are loosing a lot of charge.  There should only be enough to give it the kick.  Therefore I feel that trying to get most out the single battery is a good goal.  After all, a 9V battery costs $4.  And $4 can get you 100 kilowatt hours of electricity, or 43 days worth of nutritional calories.  What we need is a Newman machine that can run on a 9V battery with about 100 watts of output for 43 days.

Actually I have a better idea.  Because we know that resistance of the batteries are much higher than even 1 km of copper wire, we should NOT connect the batteries in series, because that won't change the current.  Not only that, it will waste the rest of the charges!  Instead, we should simply hook the batteries in parallel and have all them run at the same time so that we DO get more current. In fact, I tried this and got better results than when I connected them in series, I now have my Newman machine actually jumping now!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmIqy-Zk030

stop giving people the impression that u no a lot because u don't u "quote" text  and copy and past.
on your you tube site u delete all comments of people that try to make a debate.
and the most irritant thing is u don't answer but u just go over it wit your long talks of BULLSHIT

pleas stop this sick madness