Open letter to inventors (destination: underground)

[z_p_e]

Darren no offence,
The experiments i did in the o'l days were far from overunity..
in fact it did consume alot of power to make it to what it was.

Good luck on the tube experiment ,i hope you will see the kicks.
i had switched in a couple of 100k pots and some 30k solid resistors.

Marco.

Thanks Marco.

I was sure you mentioned that you "smoothed out" the output, so I assumed you used a capacitor. Also, your output did not look rectified, so again I assumed there was some filtering being applied.

Please clarify so I can try to duplicate the kicks you had there. I want to be as accurate as possible to your setup.

Regards,
Darren

[z_p_e]

The experiments i did in the o'l days were far from overunity..
in fact it did consume alot of power to make it to what it was.

Marco.

@Grumpy

This settles it for me.

[innovation_station]

marco accept my apoligies

im sorry for being the way i was but we must all stay in our places for accomplishments to manifest

many have finished long time ago

i tryed your ring many ways and i got what i put into it back out of it a dubbel the voltage same amparage !!!!

the picture is in lotr you remember the ring im sure do it increaced in voltage from 12 to 24 volts  so what happins when put 3 the same in a stack  it would total 9 collector coils and and 9 control coils if 3 were pancakes and 6 were hemholts coils to set up the magnetic feilds  i still think your ring is verry important here

agin marco you have no idea how bad i feel for saying all those words toward you

im trying my best here im sure some of my info is crap but far from all 

is 

[turbo]

Darren no offence,
The experiments i did in the o'l days were far from overunity..
in fact it did consume alot of power to make it to what it was.

Good luck on the tube experiment ,i hope you will see the kicks.
i had switched in a couple of 100k pots and some 30k solid resistors.

Marco.

Thanks Marco.

I was sure you mentioned that you "smoothed out" the output, so I assumed you used a capacitor. Also, your output did not look rectified, so again I assumed there was some filtering being applied.

Please clarify so I can try to duplicate the kicks you had there. I want to be as accurate as possible to your setup.

Regards,
Darren

Hi Darren,
This is simply explained,
The high voltage from the plate transformer is connected to the heater transformer.
but it is only connected to one end of the winding,therefore it is not a closed circuit.
That was a bit confusing to me and as i remember correctly i took a 100kpot in series with a 30k resistor in series between the high voltage output of the tube and the scope.
i was hoping to scale the voltage down and as you know at that point i was not familiar with the shunt circuit you pointed out to me.
Anyway ,the signal was too large to fit the screen of the scope so i decided to disconnect the ground wire.
Beautiful Kicks appeard and i remember thinking this was a bit of a new area to me because i am used to work with the ancient "closed loop"
Then i thought of Steven mentioning "what changes at what speed/frequency" and something told me this had to do with high voltage charging up only one terminal like in a car ignition coil.
So based on that i am currently replicating the high frequency flame discharge in a way described in an 1916 old book and that is always intresting and fun to play with.
such a discharge can as described only be produced by a quenched spark gap meaning many capacitor discharges per second compared to the normal type spark gap.
This lead me to a wire wrapped around another wire acting like it was a quenched spark gap itself, and it did produce a spark i have never seen before, like the spark of a low fequency high power transformer.

Marco.

[turbo]

marco accept my apoligies

IS no need to appoligize , Sometimes it just get's me too.
I only want to see positive results ,but offcource that is impossible.
Let us continue working towards our goals and stay focussed on what is important.

Marco.