Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

Started by hartiberlin, August 18, 2007, 04:39:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

CrazyEwok

Quote from: sebosfato on September 08, 2009, 02:52:07 PM
@dankie i didn't ask you any free circuit as i already have the phase lock loop circuit done and working i have constructed the all design stanley meyer proposed with the resonant scanning circuit and lock indicator and feedback obviously.

Idiot is who really don't understand that electrons are consumed (being attached to the oxygen atoms to allow the hydrogen to be liberated) yes splitting the water as you know you must pass the current thru the water to make electrolysis.

lol... "consume" and electron huh... you do know that you can't technically consume anything...  (consume being in context of destroy, not ingest)
water is not consumed even in electrolysis, it is broken down / separated. The electrons may be removed (eg taken/absorbed by the electrode with the posititive charge) but its not consumed. Your statement about current goes in direct opposition with stan's theory. "yes splitting the water as you know you must pass the current thru the water to make electrolysis."
Since Mr Meyers tried to get as little current as he could your statement in this regard is null and void. If we were talking about brute force electrolysis you would be on the right track... As for your constant request for donations... if you want donations work for a charity... if you want investors speak to companies... you wuoldn't go to the goverment welfare department and ask the people in line if they can spare you some cash to go bowling would you?

sebosfato

L505 You are a moron. It is an example of how can you use electrons. You should stop being so ridiculous you seems to be a 15 years old the way you try to offend me. You probably think also that you can make resonance with very high resistance wire as the resonant inductor right?
Please stop being counter productive.
If you ever read about the info i posted you should know that:

Electrons can be emitted out of a wire (by thermionic emission) this is what he mean when says electron consumption. Meyer talk about 3 different things in his patents and papers. Resonance, Collision and electrolysis.

Photons are released from the changing of high to low energy states of the electron orbit. Photons have no mass they are electromagnetic radiation or energy.

His patents hide very well his secret but people who commonly read them aren't high voltage engineers and mostly because people tends to believe what they heard. 99,99999% of High voltage engineers wont even read the meyer papers even if they probably have studied collision on the university. Because the 2° law of thermodynamics that have being implanted in they brains.

Meyer MAKE Reference to TAY PAtent witch talks about collision.




newbie123

Electrons might just be considered energy carriers in electrolysis..   two electrons come into  a cell with an energy of at least 1.23 eV  ...  Do work (make gas or heat)  ... Then two electrons  leave with 0 eV.. 


What Meyer's proposes is:   0 electrons (or a few) come into a cell from HV source, and voltage performs the work..    and electrons are "sucked" out of water molecules  (BS) ...

Thermionic emission involves lots of heat...   Field (induced) emission might be at play with the laser light injection & electrodes...



Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

quarktoo

Meyer stated that the electrons were converted into photons and the oxygen atoms were tricked into accepting the highly energized laser photons in exchange for their covalent electrons which is how he produced the ozone efficiently.

The ozone was mixed with steam and made to combine in a resonant cavity and that is a simple well known process. (Ultrasonic mixer)

The H2O has now become H2O2 which is hydrogen peroxide which is rocket fuel. The H2O2 hits a catalyst at exactly the time when it goes from High pressure to low pressure and while a high voltage high frequency pulse is driven through it. This causes the H2O2 to flash into superheated steam and is a well known process where the molecule is FRACTURED hence the term "SUPERHEATED STEAM EXPLOSION"

This is what people have been trying to figure out but are too stupid to get past the counter intel that has been supplanted into their feeble brains.

I find it amazing that I have given you the process used to make water fuel twice before and yet you argue about who is the dumbest. From my perspective, you all are.

kostarv

Hello!
Maybe someone could help us with a wise advice? We’re now studying  Ravi’s Water Fuel cell Replication from http://www.panaceauniversity.org/ and we faced a conflict:
In this manual we couldn't find the frequency at which the converter “boils” the water. What frequency should we tune the device? Does somebody know?

Thanx in advance
Kosta