Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[kostarv]

We're started to study the HHO topic with Ravi Cell manual http://panaceauniversity.org/Ravi%20Cell.pdf but we didn't find any mentions about the mechanism frequencies, so i addressed wise people - you : )

[HeairBear]

If you did the experiment, then, you would know the answers to your questions.

[kostarv]

Which experiment exactly?

[HeairBear]

The Ravi/Lawton experiment that you posted the link to.

[froarty]

I understand the article because I wrote it - which is to say I integrated other peoples work. based on the Puthoof atomic model my theory is very similar to the Haisch-Moddel model and could actually be tested in the same fixture. Only difference is the way we interpert the rectification of relativistic (fast) hydrogen energy. Everyone (Mills,LENR,star in a jar) all depend on the equivalence boundary of a Casimir cavity to diverge inertial frames which was introduced by Italiane researchers DiFiore et all back in 2002. It appears the small 10E-14 average deacceleration inside vs outside occurs in gradients proportional to the Spacing of the plates (or in your case either the miniscus of conductive electrolyte or actually pores on the plates) can be accelerated by heat like mills disassociating tungsten filament or acoustic energy. That is, once the equivalence boundary is set up by the Casimir effect the resulting tiny acceleration of the inertia frame can accept contributions from other sources due to the confinement. I think this is why some of the Japanese /Arata  - Zang experiments and other LENR experiments take weeks or even months to produce excess energy while the heated variety like Mills at Black Light Power are instant. I think this would not have languished for so long except for the misidentification of "fast" hydrogen as being fractional quantum state which is impossible. When Jan Naudts published his paper he did not emphasize the meaning - He was defending Mills but people took this to mean he was defending fractional states but his proof was from a math perspective and apparently you can solve for fractional states from a relativistic perspective outside the cavity - and so the war of disinformation has progressed. that is all IMHO of which you are certainly free to disagree.
Regards
Fran