Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[HeairBear]

Can you show me a working model?

[froarty]

No, I am but a poor technician playing with HHO in my basement but the Mills (BlackLight Power) validation at Rowan university is an example and no matter how you feel about his theory don't make the mistake of ignoring his data. The fractional state aspect of his hydrino theory is either wrong or in a format the mainstream simply can't understand. My theory [ http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-relativistic-hydrogen-inside-casimir-cavity-appears-have-fractional-quantum-state-external-perspective-25072.html]  combines papers from work that is understood by the mainstream - even if they don't agree with the math which is why I had to include the paper by Zottia to justify the math - the argument against using K-G or Poincare equations is correct for free space but as Zottoa points out not when the isotropy is broken and you start having space-time gradients (Casimir efffect changes ratio of long to short vacuum flux proportional to distance cubed of the plate spacing for nonideal metals). The maths are employed from a relativistic perspective and seem to allow electrons to occupy the same space/states which is why dirac equations are used in free space for electrons. Inside the cavity however you can have multiple values of time occupying the same space due to the gradient of casimir force. Of course inside the cavity the atoms are normal to each other but I am proposing that like a polar to linear translation it allows you to perform math that would be denied in the other format.

Many scientists agree all these anomallies are probably related - It's been around for so long that it isn't going to be anything obvious or would have long since been resolved, The theories proposed all conflict with the physics of free space so it is likely the more recent work in Cavity QED is needed to explain it through the exceptions that occur inside the cavity. I guess I am saying the cavity is more responsible for the excess energy than the ambient gas employed - It has nothing to do with combustion and other gases ill probably be employed in the future but for now the size of monatomic hydrogen vs the diatomic resistance to motion of certain catalytic geometries is a happy coincidence that we may be able to harness. I am hoping the work of Myers and others will allow a grandfather clause to utilize this new science without license but the first challenge is actually trying to identify how Stan tapped into this source. any ideas?
Regards
Fran

[HeairBear]

The one issue I see is heat. The splitting of the water molecules generates no detectable heat with Stan Meyer's demonstrated devices. Besides the heat issue, yes, there are similarities, but, I do not see enough commonalities to make a connection between the experiments you described and Stan Meyer's purposed theories. On the other hand I will accept your advice and not ignore the facts that have been presented. Thank you.

You will have to forgive me, for, I am not a person to make long winded posts. I'm more of a mechanical type person than a writer...

[Mk1]

http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/29990/Dr__Steven_Greer_The_Promise_of_New_Energy/

[lefferdink]

Ladies & Gentlemen:
Who or is anyone working on Stan Meyers water spark plug injector?