Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[djctek]

I posted a few more Lawton PWM's on eBay this week for those interested in saving some time...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=120172658077

[pleez2help]

@Freenrg4me..did you want to respond at all??

[Freenrg4me]

@plez2help

It is pointless to respond.

If you look at the Meyer circuit, it is a pulse compression circuit. If you look at the Dr. Stiffler circuit, it is a pulse DEcompression circuit.

Here is a "Am I experiencing reality" experiment you can do:

Print out the first patent picture of the Meyer circuit and then on the backside of the paper, print the Stiffler circuit. Next, stand in front of a mirror, look at the pictures and start laughing at yourself. ;-)

You will see the Meyer circuit is a pulse compression circuit and the Stiffler cold electricity circuit is a pulse decompression circuit.

Still don't see it?

Meyer - We go from a big inductor to smaller inductors,
Stiffler - We go from small ferrite bead inductors to large antenna core inductor.

Pulse compression to drive really hot lasers and pulse decompression to drive condensers, etc.

Something gets compressed it gets hot, something gets decompressed it gets cold.

So what does that tell us about anything?

Steven Hawking predicted that there was a space less empty than empty space, what some of you call zero point. A pulse compression circuit is the device that was held up to prove that Hawking was right. I can't draw pictures here, but from roughly 150 degrees to 200 degrees in the wave, is the zero point area. We compressed energy into time and that of course springs back at us and we use that spring to do work for us.

Like I have said so many times to deaf ears and blind eyes, all OU devices have something in common. CAVITATION. A Spark is cavitation, a jet going through the sound barrier is cavitation, electricity itself is the effect of cavitation, Aronov Bohm is cavitation.

Cavitation produces electron clusters that explode out and knock other electrons free (secondary emissions). Meyer spoke of this as have I and so many others but nobody listens. They are busy making useless bubble machines and I hope they enjoy doing it because they will not run an engine that way.

Look at how a photo multiplier works, replace the photos with electrons and start applying that to every verified OU device you aver looked at. In every case, you will find the cavitation -the heart of every OU device. That what 20 years of research on and off and ten years steady research taught me. You can have it for free.

In the Meyer device, the analog circuit SENDS the step charge to the cell, step charging is not something that happens in the cell. That is clearly stated in the patent notes and why he traced the analog circuit over the top of the pulse circuit. The PWM keeps the water from electrolyzing too much and pre-detonating in the injector, it does not make more bubbles. Just the opposite. It is like up is down and black is white with some people.

As I stated, the Meyer device is a digital version of the Puharich patent. H Gas does not get sent to the engine in either device. You are wasting your time and being led by either fools or counter intel agents. I will leave it to you to sort out the pros and the hoes.

You prep the water in the cell and blast it with plasma to explode it in the injector in both patents and others as well. This is clearly explained in both patents and nothing new.

I am not hanging out here these days, like Dr. Stiffler, I do not find this to be very fertile soil. Nothing personal but I would rather work with a small group of like minded people that are more open minded and less detractors.

If you take some beach crabs and dig a pit in the sand, the crabs could all crawl out by themselves but they can't. As soon as one crab starts to crawl out, the other crabs grab it and pull it back down. They will do that until the tide washes in and buries them all alive.

Free energy web sites have the crabs. You would do well to cure them.

Just like Dr. Stiffler pointed out in the terms of signing up on his web site regarding detractors and fools, (can no longer log in to his site - thanks assholes.)  That kind of creepy does not wash off at the end of the day and is what keeps good people away.

And so to conclude, the free energy movement has two challenges, one technical and one social. Both are important and you will not get there without solving both in my opinion.

Best of luck to all of you.

PS - Here is good example of what drives good people away:

The Pompus ass section:

Thanks Stefan

... don't know why, but this guy is a little bit suspect to me,
anyway, looking to find his circuit.

G'day Super and all,

You have reason to be suspicious. A D.Sc. is not a legitimate mainstream degree. There is reason to believe that his degree was acquired in the same fashion as the "doctorates" of Peter Lindemann D.SC. and Robert Adams D.SC. In both instances they were honorary doctorates handed out by a natural health type "college" in New Zealand.

Hans von Lieven

G'day all,

Thanks Stefan and Sterling for giving this poor bloke an avenue to publish his work.

Reading what he had to say makes one wonder if the Spanish inquisition is still alive and well. To persecute a man over his ideas on energy and other scientific issues is deplorable. Perhaps our society has not advanced as much as many claim.

I wish him well and if the necessity arises that he needs my support it will be forthcoming.

Hans von Lieven

Wow... If you were Dr. Stiffler, a man that worked on the advance energy project, an older retired scientist that spent his life doing research would you want to come here and help?

You should read some of the other posts this pompous ass (HonsVanLievan) has made. His most recent contribution was a link to the resonate frequency of the elements in response to a post I made. Unfortunately, it was a link to elements that do not exist and are purely theoretical.

I could go on with others but you know who they are. If you don't shout them down, they will continue to poison the well. I am out of here - good luck.

[surfturf]

There?s a general misunderstanding here on Meyers devices..

Dionysios You think you are so smart with your idiotic posting telling a guy who just asked for a forumthread bout Stan Meyer, that everyone who believes in him is an idiot. Thats really not the way to step forward in any field of research..You suck and you havent even read anything from the source material about Meyer. I can tell since you don?t even know his hydrogen generator is not the same as his Water splitter installed in hiss dunebuggy. In that little thing he used both Lazer and Amplitude to split the water into hydrogene and oxygene. you are a tart and a wanker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ola in Sweden

[scoodidabop]

Yo Freeeng4me....

You seem to have a handle on some realities there.

Who in your opinion has replicated Meyer's work accurately?  Has it even been done at all yet?

Would I be wasting my time in building a "plain" tube style water fuel cell to try and run my car on?



Sorry if the answer to these questions is obvious.  I'm a noob to this whole scene, and I have a bad habit of jumping into discussions without reading gobs upon gobs of forum posts.

Thanks in advance.