Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[Grumpy]

I think there are three things that matter if you are trying to do Meyer's stuff.

1. Make sure no electron transfer to the cell through the ground. Meyer used a water resistor on the first version. Pure water allows voltage to flow but no current since the ion content of the water is low.

2. Extract electrons coming out of the cell to the positive connections and convert them to heat and light in a closed loop secondary.

3. Use piezo transducer to fracture the water once the electron bonds have been weakened.

I have done hundreds of experiments over the last year and it all pointing in that direction.

People get confused between the different patents and methods and even the components themselves. For example - they look at a patent, think they are looking at 4 tubes and don't realize they are looking at 4 injectors.

Hey Saint Buzz,

I thoght you were smokin' Appalacian Weed with the piezo's but now think you may have an excellent point.

Have you explored applying the piezo vibration from different directions?

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Given to me by a reliable source who wants to remain nameless. Thanks
to our friend.

Ash
-------------------------------

Meyer used water mist that he pulsed with his dual-layered multispool
VIC(10.4), this way he avoided the stability trouble of water liquid´s
dielectric constant and the voltage breadown in liquid water. AND
REMEMBER Hydroxy HAS A SURPLUS OF ELECTRONS THAT YOU SHOULD USE WELL
AND THAT STAN NEVER MENTIONS...

Then Stan needed a positive ion to match Hydroxy with and he found out
he could prime oxygen in ambient air up until O4+ with his VIC(gas gun
app) in combination with an electron extraction circuit(EEC) and a
laser. Then he mixed it and ignited the whole mix with his voltage
igniter(VIC again). The steam resonator possibly was used to increase
or dampen the effect inside the cylinder but I am not sure about it.

Conclusion is Stan achieved at least OU of 50(maybe >100) with his ION
ENGINE and the big secret is Hydroxy being negatively charged that can
be used for the ion implosion.

At this stage I realize his car engine is a massive project of
miniparts to finish and the dual-layerred multispool VIC is a very
good start to prove his concept.

I urge everyone to wind the dual-layerred multispool VIC of 10.4 ASAP
to prove the concept.

AND I believe when you pulse the multispool VIC you only need ONE
PULSE from the primary, then the multispool backEMFs will do the work
for you until voltage breakdown, and they will come much faster than
the primary pulse too, hte more spools the faster and smaller Back-EMFs.


So basically in liquid water he needed one pulse with duration about
0.1 ms, then wait 3 secs and then send a new primary pulse. Hydroxy
will flow like crazy I guess and resonance will not be a big trouble
with the multispool VIC.

OU should be AT LEAST 10 if you have at least 4 spools.

Meyer really fooled a lot of people with all his fancy talk about
injectors, gas guns, gas processors, EECs etc, etc, nobody understood
was he was talking about. The core of his concept is a positive ion
and a negative ion, mix them and ignite. Use the multispool VIC for
better effect and less trouble with diodes because each back EMF is
much smaller than the first primary pulse so the diode can last.


So this is why I suggest that you build the WFC 10.4 drawing. Inner
core is SS430FR wire with ie 4 spools bifillary wound. Outside
isnormal magnetic qwire in 3 layers. Between each spool you will need
a diode for one inductor.

Wind the magnetic wire after secondary, continue with the SS430FR wire
in series and then go to water gap.

Thanks for any feedback on this idea. Please share it with as many
people as possible.

Good luck!

[Grumpy]

Given to me by a reliable source who wants to remain nameless. Thanks
to our friend.

Ash
-------------------------------

yada yada yada

What a load of BS. 

Must be dankie since he mentioned the SS wire.

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

You must be wrong, as i know the person who gave this to me, and this person is the one who started this thread.
Do the thinking in the lab, give the keyboard a rest.

[AhuraMazda]

You must be wrong, as i know the person who gave this to me, and this person is the one who started this thread.
Do the thinking in the lab, give the keyboard a rest.

@ash

I think it was a clever way that Grumpy got you to reveal your source!