Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

Started by hartiberlin, August 18, 2007, 04:39:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

dutchy1966

Hi everyone,

Seeing as ther is such a big difference in the price between seamless and welded 316L tubing, can anyone explain why it is better to have seamless tubing?
For a first test rig can we not use 316L welded tube?

thanks.

Robert 

saintpoida

im just guessing but i would say its because of the smoothness inside/outside the seamless tube as there is no weld bead or whatever

but i dont actually know im just guessing lol

if i am right you can probably use a welded one anyway just make the gap bigger between the tubes
so no arcing can occur where the weld bead is??

dutchy1966

Quote from: saintpoida on September 05, 2007, 05:30:30 AM
im just guessing but i would say its because of the smoothness inside/outside the seamless tube as there is no weld bead or whatever

but i dont actually know im just guessing lol

if i am right you can probably use a welded one anyway just make the gap bigger between the tubes
so no arcing can occur where the weld bead is??

Hmm, you might be right. I just presumed they would remove the excess bead after welding, but maybe not....

Robert

saintpoida

yeah beats me

Quote from: saintpoida on September 04, 2007, 07:56:02 PM
looks cool!!

i have been trying to look up and research bifilar winding for past couple days now and most of them that i see
are wound with 2 wires and have the 2 wires connected together at one end, but when looking at
stans stuff and d14 it looks more as if the 2 wires are wound together but then one is used for positive and one
is used for negative

so in simple terms when you bifilar wind the coil will you have 4 wires coming out of it or 2?

is this correct? or am i reading the diagram incorrectly? (cause they sit so close together)


anyone know the answer to the above quoted question?

dutchy1966

Quote from: saintpoida on September 05, 2007, 06:02:30 AM
yeah beats me

Quote from: saintpoida on September 04, 2007, 07:56:02 PM
looks cool!!

i have been trying to look up and research bifilar winding for past couple days now and most of them that i see
are wound with 2 wires and have the 2 wires connected together at one end, but when looking at
stans stuff and d14 it looks more as if the 2 wires are wound together but then one is used for positive and one
is used for negative

so in simple terms when you bifilar wind the coil will you have 4 wires coming out of it or 2?

is this correct? or am i reading the diagram incorrectly? (cause they sit so close together)


anyone know the answer to the above quoted question?

You will have four wires coming out (2 on each side). How you connect those wires together depends on your specific situation. In the Stan Meyer case it seems like the pulse sent down one strand will be blocked by the induction in the other strand. (and therefore reduce current flow further)

Robert