Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[saintpoida]

Also with tuning the pipes, wouldnt making the inner tube longer push it closer to the freq of the outer tube?

If so you would just need to calculate by how much longer it would need to be?

[Duranza]

Also with tuning the pipes, wouldnt making the inner tube longer push it closer to the freq of the outer tube?

If so you would just need to calculate by how much longer it would need to be?

I have done just that on my pipes... the extra lenght sits at the bottom and flush at the top. I calculated the surface area of the inside of the the outer pipe and adjusted the lenght of the inside pipe to have the same surface area. They sound identical when struck like a tuning fork..

[RunningBare]

May we please have the dimensions you used for the tubes?, when it comes to maths I'm a bit of a lazy git 

I have done just that on my pipes... the extra lenght sits at the bottom and flush at the top. I calculated the surface area of the inside of the the outer pipe and adjusted the lenght of the inside pipe to have the same surface area. They sound identical when struck like a tuning fork..

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Guys some one was talking about Bi-filar cols before a firend sent me this

Check what Tesla says below keeping the WFC and a bi-filar inductor in context:



Tesla's "COIL FOR ELECTRO MAGNETS," patent #512,340  is a very special coil design because, unlike an ordinary coil made by turning wire on a tube form, this one uses two wires laid next to each other on a form but with the end of the first one connected to the beginning of the second one. In this patent Tesla explains that the double coil will store many times the energy of a conventional coil.[1] Measurements of two coils of the same size and with the same number of turns, one with a single, the other with a bifilar winding, show differences in voltage gain. These bifilar Tesla's coils can be explained solely on the basis of their electrical activity. A bifilar coil is capable of holding more charge than a single wound coil. When operated at resonance, the distributed capacitance of the bifilar coil is able to overcome the counter - electromotive force ( e.m.f.) normal to coils, inductive reactance.

Because of the electrical activity, a bifilar coil does not work against itself in the form of a counter - e.m.f., the potential across the coil quickly builds to a high value. The difference between the turns becomes great enough that the energy is practically all potential, at this point, the system becomes an electrostatic oscillator.

Minimal work is done in my radiant energy system due to the absence of wasted displacement currents. As small heat losses occur, oscillations are maintained by surplus charge generated by atomic catalytic reactions, energy is siphoned from the kinetic moments of these charges.. After an initial input of energy from an outside Very low energy expenditure allows power delivery to an electrical load over an extended time period without an external fuel supply source, the radiant energy electrical generator will operate as a very efficient device.




The parts highlighted in red seem very very relevant in WFC context. So bifilar inductors are worth a try.What do you think?? any ideas on how we should try it??

Also
Could you check up on the following link and see if it actually works for a WFC?

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/parabifc.htm

[tao]

Guys some one was talking about Bi-filar cols before a firend sent me this

Check what Tesla says below keeping the WFC and a bi-filar inductor in context:



Tesla's "COIL FOR ELECTRO MAGNETS," patent #512,340  is a very special coil design because, unlike an ordinary coil made by turning wire on a tube form, this one uses two wires laid next to each other on a form but with the end of the first one connected to the beginning of the second one. In this patent Tesla explains that the double coil will store many times the energy of a conventional coil.[1] Measurements of two coils of the same size and with the same number of turns, one with a single, the other with a bifilar winding, show differences in voltage gain. These bifilar Tesla's coils can be explained solely on the basis of their electrical activity. A bifilar coil is capable of holding more charge than a single wound coil. When operated at resonance, the distributed capacitance of the bifilar coil is able to overcome the counter - electromotive force ( e.m.f.) normal to coils, inductive reactance.

Because of the electrical activity, a bifilar coil does not work against itself in the form of a counter - e.m.f., the potential across the coil quickly builds to a high value. The difference between the turns becomes great enough that the energy is practically all potential, at this point, the system becomes an electrostatic oscillator.

Minimal work is done in my radiant energy system due to the absence of wasted displacement currents. As small heat losses occur, oscillations are maintained by surplus charge generated by atomic catalytic reactions, energy is siphoned from the kinetic moments of these charges.. After an initial input of energy from an outside Very low energy expenditure allows power delivery to an electrical load over an extended time period without an external fuel supply source, the radiant energy electrical generator will operate as a very efficient device.




The parts highlighted in red seem very very relevant in WFC context. So bifilar inductors are worth a try.What do you think?? any ideas on how we should try it??

Also
Could you check up on the following link and see if it actually works for a WFC?

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/parabifc.htm

Much of this relates DIRECTLY to my thread I posted soon before RAVI's 'coming out'. It deals with all this directly.

"Stanley Meyer, please meet Stanislav Avramenko: Water as a fuel..."
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2967.0.html

In regard directly to the Tesla bifilar patent and setup itself, I mention in the above thread a Mr. Milan Manchich. He used a flat Tesla pancake coil, and applied a HF voltage to the inner or outer wire of the pancake coil, and on the opposite wire of the pancake coil, he placed an 'Avramenko's Plug'. http://www.keelynet.com/energy/milan.htm

Please see the thread directly for the links to Avramenko and the like.

Tesla was the KING of voltage POTENTIAL, so I think these paths of research are good to follow to potentially lead us to the best WFC control circuitry.

Peace...