Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[RunningBare]

A note to everyone who is building from my circuit, it is only stable so long as the ends of the potentiometer tracks are not reached!, full up or full down means zero resistance at one end or the other, you could of course add resistors to the track connectors to stop the resistance reaching zero, this is for the mark/space pots VR1 and VR3, suggestions for Ra and Rb are between 220 ohm and 1kohm

      Ra                            Rb
---\/\/\/\/----               ----\/\/\/\/-----
                \     |      /
              /               \
             |        O       |
             \                /
             
 
   

[Spewing]

A note to everyone who is building from my circuit, it is only stable so long as the ends of the potentiometer tracks are not reached!, full up or full down means zero resistance at one end or the other, you could of course add resistors to the track connectors to stop the resistance reaching zero, this is for the mark/space pots VR1 and VR3, suggestions for Ra and Rb are between 220 ohm and 1kohm

      Ra                            Rb
---\/\/\/\/----               ----\/\/\/\/-----
                \     |      /
              /               \
             |        O       |
             \                /
             
 
   

use a 270 ohm resistor, red violet brown.

[RunningBare]

For a bifilar winding Ravi has it correct, if wired parallel the windings will have opposite polarity, this will mean the magnetic field from each winding will cancel the other, they use this technique to reduce magnetic field effects in some electronics

What Ravi proposed and I agree is to swap the terminals of one coil, in this way they both have the same polarity, the magnet field from one wnding is multiplied by the other winding which is what we want because when that field collapses it will give a larger back emf which is what we are after, check out Tesla's bifilar winding patent.

JUST RECEIVED THIS FROM A VERY VERY RELIABLE SOURCE !!

Gh. j.

i'm sorry but if you are using the lawton circuit alone this will not do anything but limit current, the back emf is wasted, if you are going to use this whith out a use of a transformer you should use this circuit, therfor it does not wast the back emf as the first picture, if you was to use the first picture you pasted it would work fine with a transformer, but the second added diode is not doing anything, and the direction of the chokes must be hooked the right way.

using the same core means sharing a magnetic field, if hooked improperly you loose. the core inside the choke takes on a discharge effect, when sharing cores the discharge emf effect falls faster, it is better to use single cores so each chokes can fall at it's on electro magnetic field rate.

it is very important that the 3rd cycle of the transformer hits the chokes at a discharge level, if the transformer hits the chokes on the 3rd cycle and they have already been dishcharged caused by using the same core, then you loose again.

[Spewing]

A note to everyone who is building from my circuit, it is only stable so long as the ends of the potentiometer tracks are not reached!, full up or full down means zero resistance at one end or the other, you could of course add resistors to the track connectors to stop the resistance reaching zero, this is for the mark/space pots VR1 and VR3, suggestions for Ra and Rb are between 220 ohm and 1kohm

      Ra                            Rb
---\/\/\/\/----               ----\/\/\/\/-----
                \     |      /
              /               \
             |        O       |
             \                /
             
 
   

use a 270 ohm resistor, red violet brown.

edit,, just noticed that you had the values close... good deal!

[RunningBare]

This picture will explain the bifilar arrangement I hope.

http://hh0.no-ip.info/images/bifilar_comparison.jpg