Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[Spewing]

lol, you silly man, lawd. you tickled me funny bone.

i have this in my pdf if you can cifer it out...

[TheNOP]

Peter...

What if someone could strip away all the bullshit and confusion?  Would that be useful?  Would that help you be able to decide what works and what is someone's delusions?  You can tell where science is going on because theories are clearly stated, tests are devised to verify or break them and myths are crushed and tossed out.  Real science uses brutally honest methods to converge on real solutions.

I don't proclaim to know how to do this; never have.  Many here say they have great insights on how it should work, yet they cannot communicate it nor build it.  The myths and jargonistic hoo ha are never challenged.  Its a mutual admiration society based on who can out-bullshit the other.  Nobody produces successful replications here.  It seems like you are just now figuring that out!

All I'm doing is pointing out the bullshit; some of it anyway.  If you follow every thread here that claims success at anything, you will find that there is never a definition of what success is, no agreement on how to achieve it, forty three theories on how it works, nine guys claiming guru status and some of the most "creative" measurement techniques ever devised to avoid making actual straightforward measurements.  The claims and reported claims and stories of intrigue are endless.  The myths myriad.

If you stand up and shout "bullshit", the stonethrowers come out.  It's like a religion; a cult.  In the end (and there is no end...) each joker who claims success ends up getting into a hissy fit and withdrawing his earth-shattering info or giving some story about MIB hovering over him in a black helicopter and crawls off into the woodwork. 

Nobody communicates anything that ends up converging on a solution.  It's a giant circle-jerk club.

Good luck, my friend.  Meanwhile, I'd suggest building or buying an electric car and putting up wind or solar.  Waiting to run your car on water based on work done by these open-source engineer dudes around here is going to mean waiting forever and building a million projects that don't work.

HissyfitNihilism

Now, that is a usefull post.
I mean, a post that i can clearly understand the faqs.
It also made me re-realise that most web sites/forum are not the right places to learn stuff.
That is sad, but truth.

Thanks for openning my eyes.

[RunningBare]

The real truth comes from doing it yourself, I do not take the word of skeptics or believers, skeptics are quite easy to spot so easily ignored, some "so called" believers on the other hand are not easy to spot, their purpose is to try and get you to waste your time, their motives could be anything, but I would say they are just malicious pranksters.
While as a group we help each other out, each and every individual has a responcibilty to find out for themselves, I take this phylosiphy because if I screw up then I can only blame myself.

Now, that is a usefull post.
I mean, a post that i can clearly understand the faqs.
It also made me re-realise that most web sites/forum are not the right places to learn stuff.
That is sad, but truth.

Thanks for openning my eyes.

[hartiberlin]

here you go

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jewg71L2uig

@Spewing

so how many Watts of power did your drive motor draw
in this video ?

Many thanks.

[Spewing]

here you go

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jewg71L2uig

@Spewing

so how many Watts of power did your drive motor draw
in this video ?

Many thanks.

i think it has a rating of 9 amps labeled on the side. i didn't measure it because i dont have that kinda amp meter. but you know it's gotta be using 9 amps if it is on the side of the motor.

you gonna use amps or some kinda energy to turn it, theres no getting outta it.