Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Wow! Floatation machine!

Started by psychopath, September 07, 2007, 07:34:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Humbugger

Did I miss something?  How is the water remaining in the column at all when the top is unsealed to get the floating weight out?  It certainly looks like the column is open at the bottom in the bucket of water, so if the top were opened, the column would drop way down and the bucket would flood the floor unless the bottom of the column was temporarily sealed tight.

It looks like there are video-edit-concealed things going on at both top and bottom of the water column during the time the floating weight is manually taken out of there and put back on the chain.

Maybe Ashtweth Nihilisti Dasien and Gaby de Wilde Man can get together with Charles Campbell,  Jesse McQueen, Lawrence Tseung and maybe Innovation Station to figure out a way to fix these minor adjustment problems.  I'm sure the concept is sound...it just needs lots of replications, ten or twenty years of laborious tweaking and a large R&D grant from the public! 

How dare you scoff at such promising ideas, Argona and Tinu!  You haven't even built one yet!  Damn armchair skeptics!  Don't you know you are not allowed to comment unless you have built at least seven failed versions of it first?  And posted gigabytes of slickly-edited videos?  And broadly proclaimed huge arcing overunity energy output power levels each time before doing any tests?  You should be ashamed!

::)

Humbugger

Oh, and one more thing:  I can tell you are both CIA oil-men educated at Ivy League universities and members of Skull and Bones and the Trilateral Commission.  Know how I can tell?  Easy.  You both seem to be able to spell and form complete sentences!  Damn armchair skeptic oil-men anyway...

gaby de wilde

You seem to know exactly what is non of your business.  When I study your web design my mission ends here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=profile;u=4380

You are very, give me tips on how to make a website. It seems you have no idea about the whole topic. You don't even have a free homepage some place. You are not going to get a lot of visitors like this?

Ah, what about that?

Apparently it's perfectly cool to tell you how wrong you are. You do it yourself all of the time using a very weird vocabulary. Like when we compared your website to mine and you said I was the one doing things wrong remember? And you are now going to use surgery on me? You the anonymous armchair septic? Do feel free to stop talking about me Anonymous. I don't need you promoting my website for me.

I compare your videos to those of Lawrence. You seem to have forgotten to press record? You know? The basics again?

I suggest you go easy on the crackpot accusation.  Also feel free to stop your poor investors preaching. You know as much about investing as about web design.

Are you out of diapers jet miss/mister? Or Senior citizen already? How do you wish we look at you Anonymous?

Oh wait, you desire to remain fully anonymous while you slander people? What an interesting detail little boy.

Feel free to grow up now.

blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

gaby de wilde

Quote from: Humbugger on September 07, 2007, 01:50:42 PM
Did I miss something?  How is the water remaining in the column at all when the top is unsealed to get the floating weight out?  It certainly looks like the column is open at the bottom in the bucket of water, so if the top were opened, the column would drop way down and the bucket would flood the floor unless the bottom of the column was temporarily sealed tight.

You seem to know all the questions already.

Now that hardly makes a good excuse to rant about people building research devices.

You poor thing.
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

tinu

No Hum, you?ve missed absolutely nothing, really.
Just the same story, as usual.
But stay tuned. I suspect it?s not over yet. You know?

The part in which the ?pill? is removed has to be just but not more than ?just a little bit? perfected?
It?s a small ?technical? issue, almost solved. Then maybe a ?special OU component? is needed but, hey, someone is almost ready to sell it. Just a small amount of money is still needed for completing the ?research?.

Anyway, good news is the above installation can be used as it is in mountain streams. (This was really funny! In fact, with a good pump ?not shown in the video but obviously there- one can create his own small mountain stream. ;D)
So can be used a small nuclear reactor. (As the stream would chill it nicely)
Still, I?d prefer a simple paddle wheel. A turbine might already be too much of a trouble.
Not to mention the expenses.

By the way, speaking about money and expenses: what?s the proud in spending tens or hundreds of times more, when a simple proof of device can be done in any school lab, with several bucks?!
(Well, other proud beside the ability of fooling people.)

Tinu

P.S. My real issue is that I?m not really an ?armchair skeptic?. Actually, believe it or not, I?m currently testing the theories of gaby de wilde, as per my post in Tseung thread mentioned above.
Like I?ve tested many others before. (Still just a few as compared to the enormous number of ?inventions? appearing all the time.)
I still do some tests but I?m not longer that patient. I?ll post my findings and ask the author to remove his/her un-founded claims. Very few understand and less comply. And that?s where the real value between one person and another reveals: it?s not bad to be wrong but it?s bad to be wrong, proved you were wrong and still not admitting it. :o


Humbugger

Quote from: gaby de wilde on September 07, 2007, 02:07:29 PM
Quote from: Humbugger on September 07, 2007, 01:50:42 PM
Did I miss something?  How is the water remaining in the column at all when the top is unsealed to get the floating weight out?  It certainly looks like the column is open at the bottom in the bucket of water, so if the top were opened, the column would drop way down and the bucket would flood the floor unless the bottom of the column was temporarily sealed tight.

You seem to know all the questions already.

Now that hardly makes a good excuse to rant about people building research devices.

You poor thing.

Gabriela, my dear,

Thank you for your sincere and heartfelt outpouring of pity.   :-*  I need it.  Ashtweth has been snarling at me.   :'(  By the way, when you quoted my post over on the Chas circus, why did you erase the punch line?   :D


@Tinu

I have yet to observe anyone back off even an inch from any pet delusion, no matter how solid the proof I present.  Is it my lack of tact?  Or maybe my breath?   :P


Da Humbugger