Working reconstruction of Peregrinus?s Wheel having cross-like stator

[Humbugger]

Violation of CoE has been demonstrated experimentally beyond any doubt in a physical energy-producing machine.

"What remains is to harness this violation by a skillful engineering effort in a convenient straightforward practical device (the device proving violation of CoE can also be applied in practice but that isn't straightforward)."

I assume you are referring to the SMOT shown in this video. 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2383887636280790847

Is this the device that can be applied in practice but isn't straightforward?  Or is there another device I've missed?  If so, please describe any (even non-straightforward) practical application for us.

Humbugger

Why? This thread is about Peregrinus' device.

Well, I guess because you brought it up.  If you'd rather not tell us the secret practical application because it's not straightforward and takes too much time to describe then okay.  How about a terse yes or no answer to the question "Is this a video of the device you are referring to?"

It's only two or three characters...YES or NO...probably would be okay to sneak in here...it doesn't seem like this is too much to ask or too busy a thread.  Or maybe you could suggest an appropriate alternative thread where you could post your terse or more elaborate answer.

Humbugger

[Omnibus]

Like I said, this is a discussion of Peregrinus' device, therefore, I'm not going to discuss other issues. Violation of CoE has been demonstrated conclusively also in this forum and if you're interested how this was done browse around and you'll learn. Your confusion isn't an issue worth discussing so don't clutter the thread with it.

[Humbugger]

Like I said, this is a discussion of Peregrinus' device, therefore, I'm not going to discuss other issues. Violation of CoE has been demonstrated conclusively also in this forum and if you're interested how this was done browse around and you'll learn. Your confusion isn't an issue worth discussing so don't clutter the thread with it.

You remind me of an ex girlfriend I once had who called me a dozen times after our breakup.  Each time, all she told me was, very emphatically, that she was never going to speak to me again!

I don't keep track of the count, but I've seen you do this at least a dozen times.  You boldly insert your absolute statement of CoE being disproven into any unrelated thread and when anyone questions it or asks for more details, you delight in insulting their intelligence and then curtly say you are not going to go into it.  Sounds like a repetitive clinical pathology to me!

Humbugger

[Omnibus]

Like I said, this is a discussion of Peregrinus' device, therefore, I'm not going to discuss other issues. Violation of CoE has been demonstrated conclusively also in this forum and if you're interested how this was done browse around and you'll learn. Your confusion isn't an issue worth discussing so don't clutter the thread with it.

You remind me of an ex girlfriend I once had who called me a dozen times after our breakup.  Each time, all she told me was, very emphatically, that she was never going to speak to me again!

I don't keep track of the count, but I've seen you do this at least a dozen times.  You boldly insert your absolute statement of CoE being disproven into any unrelated thread and when anyone questions it or asks for more details, you delight in insulting their intelligence and then curtly say you are not going to go into it.  Sounds like a repetitive clinical pathology to me!

Humbugger

Please keep you personal stories to yourself and understand that this is a theread discussing a concrete device. The definitively proven fact that CoE can be violated is discussed elsewhere.

[hartiberlin]

Humbugger, please stay ontopic and stop your annoying skeptiszm.
The guy has also some other incrediable videos online, where the framerate
is faster and you can see it selfturning !