SMOT OU?

[Omnibus]

It is your own point of view that says if it's overunity or not. In a 4 dimensional view, yes, because the ball is traveling with no apparent input of energy, thus the distance it travels being a excess of the created energy. And some don't think of this, time bubbles. If you were to seperate the space time of the operational smot with our space time, there would be a disconnect of you placing the ball on the track. Thus if you were to loop the space time, which is theoreticaly possible, you would create a perpetual motion machine in a differen't "time bubble". IF string theory is right, then you could go to a higher dimension and and create a bridge between the looping space time. Giving you abilities to harvest the excess energy through the bridge. Like I said, this is your point of view, mine requires a high level of abstraction. Some people have a hard time wrapping their brains around my point of view, so they think in a more 3d concrete manner. Are universe is a non-linear place of virtual particles popping in and out of existance.

Don't even bother discussing this. You are so confused that any disussion with you would be nothing but waste of time.

[Nostradamus2]

Omnibus, I  agree 100% the proper technology development needs knowledge base and proper development tools (most often very expensive). It's not task for one or few home amateurs. I can't say it's impossible but very very hard.
It's clear, to close loop system must produce more energy than all losses together. Have you any theory how excess energy is gained ? Don't you think it's the same mechanism of time-variant transactions of Steorn technology ?

[Nostradamus2]

It is your own point of view that says if it's overunity or not. In a 4 dimensional view, yes, because the ball is traveling with no apparent input of energy, thus the distance it travels being a excess of the created energy. And some don't think of this, time bubbles. If you were to seperate the space time of the operational smot with our space time, there would be a disconnect of you placing the ball on the track. Thus if you were to loop the space time, which is theoreticaly possible, you would create a perpetual motion machine in a differen't "time bubble". IF string theory is right, then you could go to a higher dimension and and create a bridge between the looping space time. Giving you abilities to harvest the excess energy through the bridge. Like I said, this is your point of view, mine requires a high level of abstraction. Some people have a hard time wrapping their brains around my point of view, so they think in a more 3d concrete manner. Are universe is a non-linear place of virtual particles popping in and out of existance.

Free energy is NOT coming from black holes, dark matter, fourth dimension, from outer space, wrapped time, non-linear space, earth magnetic field, nor from Einstein's asshole. You think so just because you don't know physics. What is CoE and from where it is coming.

[Omnibus]

Omnibus, I  agree 100% the proper technology development needs knowledge base and proper development tools (most often very expensive). It's not task for one or few home amateurs. I can't say it's impossible but very very hard.
It's clear, to close loop system must produce more energy than all losses together. Have you any theory how excess energy is gained ? Don't you think it's the same mechanism of time-variant transactions of Steorn technology ?

One way of producing excess energy is through proper superposition of two conservative fields. The resultant field, as a result of this proper superposition, is non-conservative. Such is the resultant field in the SMOT or Finsrud. Another way is to have a conservative field change from within the system while traversing the closed loop. This is what devices such as those of Torbay or Steorn are based on. So far Steorn's is one of the most interesting as a practical application of this principle. Unfortunately, so far only SMOT has been demonstrated in a way conclusively proving production of energy from nothing.

[billmehess]

Just curious
Has anyone been able to bring the ball back to the origional starting point? Not acutally geting past the sticky point but at least able to bring the ball back to its origional starting point. And if so would this be considered "closing the loop"?