SMOT OU?

[Omnibus]

Doh! Hahahahahaha,

Omnibus I take it back, you?re a GENIUS
nice catch acp.
LOL.

Ah I see now, I obviously am a moron. Yes the ball does indeed travel along the closed loop A-B-C-A.

At least until the guy goes for a cup of coffee or  goes for a piss or goes to sleep etc.....

Edit.

Oh I'm confused again

The undeniable fact is that the ball ... the ball ... tha ball ... travels along the closed A-B-C-A loop

Are there 3 balls? I only saw one, but maybe I could have missed the other two.

Hey, moron, stop cluttering the thread with your impudent nonsense.

[Omnibus]

The ball.....the ball....tha ball, is imparted energy by a morons hand 

You're a complete idiot. Don't continue reconfirming this fact by posting nonsense.

[Omnibus]

Dear Omnibus, with no disrespect I would like to mention that the problem here seems to be that there are two substantially different definitions of "closed loop" being used in this thread.

Your definition of a closed loop -- and it would be of great help if you actually wrote out a clear definition of what that is yourself -- from my view is that the ball need only return close to its starting point. However, this only being close to point "A" then requires a critical amount of work by the hands and fingers of the operator to return the ball to point "A" that it may again travel your " closed loop". So it seems the operator's efforts are part of your system to keep the ball moving. Not a problem if this is your definition. You could add a rocket engine or a chipmunk pushing the ball with his nose if it were part of your definition.

On the other hand, others in this thread -- including myself -- define a closed loop within a SMOT as one that moves the ball through all its steps automatically with NO assistance or added energy (such as a human hand) from outside. Here, the ball has to return to its exact starting point on its own that it may continue the up hill section again. So basically this definition of a closed loop would operate on its own indefinitely.

j

Don't try to confuse the issue. The loop A-B-C-A which the ball travels along is a closed loop. Period. End of story.

[Omnibus]

Conclusion: 

1) Omnibus is obviously the "moron" here. Nobody else uses that word that much. 

2) No free energy from smots as long as you have to use external power to return the ball.

3) I question Ominus being a so called "physics professor". He does not act like a well educated person.

4) His equations does not compute. It takes a self running loop capable of producing excess energy to violate CoE.

5) Please calm down Omnibus and stop being so rude to people. Explain the SMOT in detail instead.
    Don't leave out the how the ball will get returned without the use of external energy, e.g hand power. 

Please read:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2733.msg40743.html#msg40743
Omnibus refuses to debate his theory when facing a real academical and competent person. Aka Dingus Mungus.

Hey, idiot, stop spamming the thread, you moron.

[Omnibus]

Trust me, you don't want to know! , but if you insist, here is the long winded version 

5) Please calm down Omnibus and stop being so rude to people. Explain the SMOT in detail instead.
    Don't leave out the how the ball will get returned without the use of external energy, e.g hand power. 

Hey, retard,, this is not a place to demonstrate how stupid you are. Go away.