Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tesla Switch need help

Started by TheOne, September 16, 2007, 07:27:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

gyulasun

Hi Fausto and All,

I have checked your calculations.  I know the formula for calculating the Q charge stored in a capacitor is Q=1/2(C*V*V), ok?  So if your C=22000uF which is 0.022F, and you charge up this capacitor to 12V, then the stored charge is: (0.022*12*12)/2=1.584C, ok? 

Now in your  test 1:

C1 = 12v and  1.584C
C2 = 8v  and   0.704C
C3 = 4v  and   0.176C
C4 = 4v  and   0.176C,  ok?

Now in your test 1 when you connect C1 and C2 in series, their voltages add up to 24V but their resultant capacity gets half of any one of them! This means that when you discharge them into any load (be it two series capacitors or any other load) the resultant capacitance of C1 and C2 in series will be 11000uF i.e. 0.011F!
This means that the charge they represent will be (0.011*24*24)/2=3.168C  and this will be available to charge up C3 and C4.   
Now let's calculate if there is any extra charge available after your test 1 when we consider your test 1 results. We simply add up the charges of C1 to C4 as 1.584+0.704+0.176+0.176=2.64C,  ok?

So you have received 28V from 2*12V=24V input voltage and you have received 2.64C charge from 3.168C input charge. 

So you seem to have a gain of  16.6% in voltage but a loss of 20% in charge. This seems strange...

I have no time now to check your other 3 tests, maybe tomorrow when I have time.  If you or anyone else disagree with my calculations please write.  I hope your real world tests will bring better results and then calculations will be also closer to truth,  so far we have been playing with numbers from simulations, right?

rgds,  Gyula

Laserrod

Gyula,
I connected a charged cap in series with a discharged cap across a Xenon tube/inductor and simply ionized the tube with a 3 dollar Mouser trigger transformer enerzised w/scr .1uF 200v charged cap. The inductor keeps the current transfering/shuttling from cap,tube to cap.
two 450v 560uF electrolitics thats 57 WS a piece. The trick is getting a impedance match. Think of how you start out in 1st gear and shift up to match avail power to load.

I believe there is a unobservable process with discharges that captures radiant.

Ed Gray motor uses HV sparks from a carbon electrode and a special surround grid to capture radiant energy.

The Corrias copied that idea to patient "Abnormal Glow Discharge Generator." (spark between plates in a vacuum tube and plate/rectifier circuit)

And I think lightning taps that aether/gravity energy too.

I think the neon bulb would simplifie implementing my spark gap/nature sync timing idea and I've just read you guys have been using spark gap too.

The experts say lightning bolts are triggered from outer space by XRAY pulse but I beleave they have it backwards; the lightning causes the XRAY pulse; the avalanche is triggered by scaler/gravity interference then lightning generates XRAY.

Man, I heard a lightning bolt last night that I'll never forget. It was astronomaile and must have sprited out of this universe!  I'm in Mo and I bet they heard it in Colorado. Wow. Tornados around too!
H2O is the best dielectric.


@OTTO
3 layer TPU sounds great man, liked to buy U a beer. Good things come the the hardest workers!

Cheers

DGM
Stop preventing democracy & stop the buying of gov by the rich. Have a good day and live by what I say.

Laserrod

Groundloop,
You need to make a PS to feed you opto fet drivers. Use a diode/cap booster deal or something. FETS should not get hot because 15mOHMS at 10-30 amps is .5 watt. If you use  bipolar instead it's 21 watts device dissipation. If the FET diode is trouble; just use FETs back to back. You got to learn how to float each each opto/fet switch. Think of all the power you save compared to bipolar voltage drops!
Most power FETs need 10v or more on the gate to be full on. I hope you understand what I'm saying.
Fets are great! They need lots of volts to turn on & the gate is a @.0001uF  load & needs to be driven hard so while it's turning on it's dropping voltage, it should be quick enough as to not get hot.
Transistors/bipolar need current. FETs need voltage to vary output power.
When a FET is full on you can disconnect the gate and the gate charge will linger to keep it on.
The FET power savings adds up when your running 30 amps or so.

BTW the best music amps uses a FET PA. FETs are as good or better than tube amps.
Less heat less problems with FETs!
Tubes and FETs are both voltage linear.

Cheers
DGM
Stop preventing democracy & stop the buying of gov by the rich. Have a good day and live by what I say.

Groundloop


gyulasun

Quote from: Groundloop on January 09, 2008, 04:53:29 PM
[EDIT] Deleted.



Groundloop,

Sorry to see you have deleted your contributions.  I hope your excellent experiments brings you the desired results and much fun too.

Gyula