Tesla Switch need help

[Laserrod]

Hi guys,
Groundloop,
I would have apriciated a mention or thank you for helping you. Your work will be rewarded anyway.
Sounds to me like your focus on succsess had precise acuracy now.!

Cheers,
DGM

[gyulasun]

Hi guys,
Groundloop,
I would have apriciated a mention or thank you for helping you. Your work will be rewarded anyway.
Sounds to me like your focus on succsess had precise acuracy now.!

Cheers,
DGM

Dear DGM,

While I cannot fully understand  why your mainly general notices on this MOSFET switching you wrote in this thread to Groundloop would be of much, much help,  it is just you who tend to ignore some response...
I mean my question for instance in this thread on January 3 put to you: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3316.msg67888.html#msg67888  and you elegantly slipped that over.
Don't tell me you have not noticed it....

By the way, Groundloop wrote he would prefer using small signal transformers to opto couplers and it was NOT your advice.  This is an open Forum, once you write about an idea/circuit/advice, it will be seen by many people and unless you say you copyright your circuit/idea etc. it may get into public domain.  Of course it is up to each person reading it to make a reference where, when and from whom he/she has taken that idea/circuit/advice, from my part I always refer to the particulars, for me and for many other persons this is natural,  PROVIDED there IS something important, propriatory, etc in that circuit/idea/advice in question.

I mean no offence with this letter, I simply felt writing out this for you.

Respectfully
Gyula

[Groundloop]

@Laserrod,

Thanks for your comments. I think I need all help that I can get on this project.
It will also be helpful with real circuit drawings and suggestions on how to solve
a particular problem. BTW: I did delete my post because of the "sum" of Internet
feedback lately, NOT because of you or another single person.

@Gyulasun

You have good points. Sharing circuit solutions is a good way to solve a problem.

I will repost my circuit drawing when I have the new prototype (version 2) ready.
I have tried to get this to work before with poor results. I made a circuit I called FECAP.
You can see that project here: http://home.no/ufoufoufoufo/FECAP/fecap.htm
I still has the circuit drawings if someone want to have a look. But that circuit did
not work at all.

After I have tested the version 2 then I will try out the transformer idea. This circuit will be more
like the Bedini/Brandt circuit. But I think we must go slow and do a lot of tests before we can get
any good results.

Groundloop.

[Groundloop]

@All,

I guess you have looked at the document found here: http://home.no/ufoufoufoufo/FECAP/cond.zip

This document describes the method of filling a cap via an inductor coil so that we get a 1.4 Gain.
Is there anybody reading this that can check the math in this document? (I'm poor with math.)

Now if we look at the attached document, is this (described in the document) what we are doing here?
First we charge up two caps (in parallel) via an inductor coil. Then we series those two caps and dump
them into the other two caps (in parallel) via an inductor coil. Any comments on this?

Groundloop.

[plengo]

@gyulasun 
sorry about that. I think I am not thinking right. I "thought" I saw an little math error (just adding the numbers) but there is none.

I will try that idea of the resistor to mimic more of real life scenarios. My goal now is to first proof concept if it is even possible mathematically using the simulator that could be doing things in a more than perfect but the margins of erros here would be neglectible because if it would show a 10% gain here and there would be just enough to show if it "could be possible" or not. Real lab will really dictate the success, but before that long hours running things I want to see where is the best spot to test first.

@Groundloop,
yes, that what we are trying to do at least for now. I have not thought of another explanation yet for the success of the 4 switch system. Either the caps are doing something in a not very linear phasion, just as explained by the square relation between voltage and charges, and or, the coil is doing something interesting.

I think the two is the secret really. I always thought that, but I really want to test one and each one of them at the time so that if we are succefull we will also know where to improve.

I am still playing with more configurations of caps being charged and discharge with all sort of combinations and I am seeing interesting things. Caps in series discharging to caps in series are different beasts. Also, what would happen if as in the document, we discharge a cap to the coil but having a load right there in between, then another load right after the coil discharges to the second cap? twice the same 1/2 energy utilized? Would that be a total of 1 "energy" therefore not loosing any really?

Why coils do that? is it because they are really hundreds may be thousands of little caps in series or parallel inside?

So many tests to run.... This is so exciting!

Fausto.