Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[giantkiller]

@LocalJoe,
Absolutely. It is the law of diminishing power as the energy travels away through the distance. We, our physical matter, only exist in an infantismally small slice of this immensely wide spectrum of the moving force. We are always trying to inject control at some point. Prior attempts are our creating detonations that our eyes and ears can see. But these are on the downside or backside of our presence. When we attempt to use controls from the upside or beginning of our toolset we can better affect the downside or backside of the point at which we are attempting to control. Same as cell phone, and fm freqencies not cutting out when we go under a bridge but am radio signals disappear. Same as microwaving food. Higher energy at a lower target. And what about lower energies pointing at a higher target? Like a stone skipping across water.

So having said that I will introduce the future to now.
I met with mining engineers from the school of Mines in Golden. Their concern was retrieving lost miners after a collapse event (cave in). They were trying to devise a safety product. I could see their attempts had numerous errors because of the resistance of rock above the event. Huge amount of problems still not circumnavigated by all the currently accepted technology available. I told them I could put a GK4 on every miner and that when set to 'on' this would produce a signal that could read by satellites no matter the depth of the collapse. Is this a fantastic claim? Not according to Tesla...

So instead of combatting the auto industry or the oil cartel, which will get you dead, I am approaching the industrial safety avenue. This activity is requires strict adherance through OSHA and other organizations of other countries. Radient energy can by gotten to the public application this way. 

I am also prototyping the BFG2000 at this time. It is the applications of 3 frequencies against any matter. I am using the Keely Liberator configuration. This should prove interesting.

--giantkiller. Dream big or live a nightmare.

[John M]

Giantkiller,

I have noticed that you seem to use more then one turn in your collector coils. If so, have you also tried a single turn like Otto has? I much appreciate your earlier postings of your work on this.

Just a general statement that some people have been talking about transit time being must faster in tubes. Does it really matter if we are dealing with sub or even a few mhz switching times.

Also, how can I post a reply to a particular message. I feel stupid for not knowing how to do it yet like so many of you have.

John

[giantkiller]

Giantkiller,

I have noticed that you seem to use more then one turn in your collector coils. If so, have you also tried a single turn like Otto has? I much appreciate your earlier postings of your work on this.

Just a general statement that some people have been talking about transit time being must faster in tubes. Does it really matter if we are dealing with sub or even a few mhz switching times.

Also, how can I post a reply to a particular message. I feel stupid for not knowing how to do it yet like so many of you have.

John

Hit the 'quote' in the upper right of the message.

I used one turn in the mobius ECD. That was per the doco.
A couple of posts ago I posted the use of 4 turn 16g speaker pair. That gives 4 edges. Like square copper. Sm said some in series and some in parallel. They all give results. TaDa!

--giantkiller.

[Localjoe]

Ok so basically id like to liquefy stone on demand   ...Kidding.  Take your device, the bfg2000 but add this GK, and I don't want money, just throw me a bone for the concept if you get big. 

If the liberator can produce generic freq that can be used on whatever matter this wouldn't be useful for the destroying or dissoicating part, and it would be way more work if theres already a logic construct to go off of, but it may open the doors to transmutation of elemental structure.  So if there were a form of matter that was readily changeable once one or two of the 3 forces were released or put in bypass we could say.

1) Point BFG at matter whatever it may be, sensor program uses primary emmiter, bombards matter with single freq sweep until first resonate freq/chord is determined. Some means of a collector will need to be devised, think of shooting a laser at window catching the refraction on a pv cell and evaluating the laser as the carrier and the refraction as the modulated carrier, The difference of the two yields sound/audio in this sense but could be modified with a different carrier means to do this freq acquisition function.


2)Sensor program locks first freq/chord and starts bombarding target matter with first locked freq and using secondary emmiter sweeps to find second resonate freq

3) After sensor program locks both first and second freq directly scanning for the third may be dangerous while emmiting the first two for fear of being blown up.  After finding the first 2 freq/chords, it would be more advantageous to have a set calculation that could find the 3rd variable based off the first two.  This may take a great deal more understanding of how these three binding forces freq/chord values correlate to the elements on the periodic table and the and if there is a set ratio to work from once you have a starting point.  So what I gathered from keely is it was essential to use 3 freq/chord's to dissociate matter or whatever he called his liberating process of the

I. The Radiative : called also the `Dispersing,' the `Propulsive,' the `Positive,' and the `Enharmonic.'
II. The Focalising: called also the `Negative,' the `Negative Attractive,' the `Polarising,' and the `Harmonic.'
III. The Dominant: called also the `Etheric,' or the `Celestial.'                                                               

So theres my idea for a differential targeting computer for means of dissociating or reorganizing matter

It is confusing to find the word chord mixed up with freq here and there and the only thing i could make of it is maybe their implying 3 notes in a chord create a single freq.  Delving a bit deeper that would mean that an a 432 tuning has to be used other wise the freq of the notes would not be constructive interference within each  chord, in an a musical sense.  Taking that into account it would be interesting to see what notes in what chords added to what frequencies in this a 432 tuning and if the fit the formula progression 1/ Ф,  1,  Ф,  Ф Ã,²,  Ф Ã,³ .  Keely's work mentions this a 432 concert tuning .

[giantkiller]

@Localjoe,
These are exactly the specs of frequencies I have been collecting.
Numerous posters have posted frequency combinations that makes a 3 frequency device possible for testing.
We shall see. This is the only place on the planet where this concert is going on. And I like that.
So we will prove or disprove any and all. Or whatever is tested.

Right now I sum all 3 channels together through a 60 watt Fender amp while sending each channel to a TPU segment.
So I have a Triade channel TPU driver with audio feedback! This is a first... Freakin' cool, eh? This is what should have been in the SM videos.
RCA comin' home to roost.

--je'an kilar.