TPU - General Discussion

[Grumpy]

... wether it is 7.3 ,5000,or 35,000 who knows?  ...

Gee Lindsay, you just gave away the magic formula! Let's see if anyone can make good use of it.
I wonder where the 1,2,3 frequency mix myth comes from.
Jacob

Jacob, want to talk about this?

For a long time I have been puzzled by the following question from Steven:

"Rotation of field. . . How many people think about that. If you could have a field that you could think of as a big ball. And you could rotate it in two directions what would the ramifications be?"

I couldn't tell what the ramification would be at all! Reason is that I was visually picturing the "two directions" as happening in 2 different cartesian planes.

Then, I realized the obvious: the rotation had to occur in the same plane. Now it all made sense...

So, if we rephrase Steven's question to this new context, it becomes:

"Rotation of field. . . How many people think about that. If you could have a field that you could think of as a big ball. And you could rotate it clockwise and counterclockwise at the same time, what would the ramifications be?"

In this new context, we DO have implications, don't we? At least 3 anyway:

1) We now have 2 balls instead of one because we are rotating in opposite directions.

2) We also have 2 particles accelerators. Here is why: When, in electro-magnetism, we consider the movement of electric charges in a magnetic field, we usually consider charges moving perpendicularly to the B field. However, it is important to realize that the preferred path for electrons in a magnetic field is parallel to the flux lines. This has been observed in space where electrons near the earth are sucked in at on pole and released at the other one. So, since an electron in a magnetic field follows the flux lines while moving forward at a relatively low speed and since the collector in the fluxline of the "ball" we are rotating , there will always be some free electrons in the collector accelerated to the "ball" rotational speed.

3) Every half revolution or so, the 2 balls will come to a relative position where their ball shaped fields will be in complete opposition, and therefore cancel each other. When this occurs, something will happen. This something is what we are interested in...

Before going any further, I would like to point out that several posts make it abundantly clear that Steven doesn't know for sure where the energy produced by his device comes from. The official line is that it comes from the earth magnetic field, but modern physics shows this is not the case. Because of this, there are 2 models to explain what goes on inside TPU.

The SM model

Steven says that if we can cancel the magnetic flux, electron that are already spinning around in our particle accelerator will accelerate even more, and when the speed gets to a specific treshold, energy is released.

This model is interesting, but has 2 important drawbacks:

1) It is poorly documented. Where can we find information about this?

2) It doesn't explain the need for a special frequency mix. Just for a minimum value.

Because of these 2 drawbacks, I personally prefer the model that follows, which I call the Drake model:

The Drake model

This model is named after James F. Drake, professor of Physics at the University of Maryland http://www.glue.umd.edu/~drake/. Professor Drake is not aware of the existence of the Drake model in TPUology. Actually, professor Drake is probably anaware of TPUology itself.

Nonetheless... In one of his public presentation, professor Drake plainly states:

"A reversed magnetic field is a source of free energy".

Quite a statement! A free energy source? What do we need to tap this?

Very simple! First, we need to create a "reversed magnetic field", which in this context means two opposing magnetic fields. How many segments we use to achieve this can be discussed, but using bifilar coils in individual segments achieves that goal.

Then, we need the component that taps the energy. The fun part about this component is that a simple multi-strand wire does the job. Collector is a very appropriate name for it since it must also be perpendicular to the coils, in this infamous 90 degrees no-coupling position! Gee, the TPU already has the right configuration, aren't we lucky or what?

O.K. A little theory concerning the Drake model: When opposing flux meets, it creates a situation where at a very precise point, the resulting magnetic field cancel itself. What actually happens is a reorganisation of the flux lines. "When this happen", says Professor Drake, "an event similar to a sonic boom takes place". The picture below illustrates this magnetic explosion. The epicenter is the yellow area in the middle of the picture. What can be seen on either side of the explosion is a stream of electrons animated with an energy of hundreds of thousands of electron-volts.

This is known as magnetic reconnection, and can be described as the sudden reshaping of the magnetic field lines of the two opposing magnetic fields, linking them together so to speak. It liberates an enormous amount of energy in the dimensional plane of the collector coil. Understandingly, if you chain 3 such high energy releasing processes, you can end up with flame capable electrical power.

As it happens, this phenomena is extremely interesting. Wikipedia expands on it on these terms:

"The resistivity of the current layer allows magnetic flux from either side to diffuse through the current layer, cancelling out flux from the other side of the boundary. "

i.e.: the disappearance of the magnetic field is compensated with the apparition of an electrical current in the collector.

Wikipedia continues: "When this happens, the plasma is pulled out by magnetic tension along the direction of the magnetic field lines."

i.e.: if there are nails on the wall, they could be sucked in.

And again: "The resulting drop in pressure pulls more plasma and magnetic flux into the central region, yielding a self-sustaining process."
i.e.: We need a kill switch.

Now, back to the Drake model: There used to be a problem with magnetic reconnection: from a theorical standpoint it was happening too fast! But professor Drake noticed something really weird that seems to explain this discrepency: the presence of whisler waves. Professor Drake call this "Whistler Signature".

What's a whistler wave? Wikipedia answers it this way: "A Whistler is a very low frequency electromagnetic (radio) wave generated by lightning. Frequencies of whistlers are 1 to 30 kHz, with maximum usually at 3 to 5 kHz. Although they are electromagnetic waves, they occur at audio frequencies, and can be converted to audio using a suitable receiver. They are produced by lightning strikes (mostly intracloud and return-path) where the impulse travels away from the earth and returns to the earth traveling along magnetic field lines."

What professor Drake says is that the magnetic reconnection process is driven by very specific frequencies like the one we need to produce the "TPU effect". That these waves act as a catalist to produce magnetic explosions known as magnetic reconnection. Well, it certainly looks as if all the ingredients are there, doesn't it?

When we consider this model, understanding TPU windings and processes becomes much easier. We evidently have to rotate two magnetic fields in opposite directions. How this is achieved is a matter of strategy: one full lenght segment, 3 X 120 degrees segments, 4 X 90 degrees segments... Like Steven said: different configurations can yield results. But it would seem that using coils that go all the way around makes the process very tricky.

Mixing the frequencies can also be achieved in several ways. Personally, I would first try rotating each "ball" at a different speed. We could for instance have a clockwise rotation at 245 Khz, and a counter-clockwise rotation at 35 Khz, so that every time the flux cancels, the radial angle is different.

Also, if we feed the power generated by the magnetic explosions occurring in the first collector to the control windings of the second collector coil, we have a situation where the bullet fired by a cannon becomes another cannon. And so on...

The picture below shows the magnetic explosion resulting from the reconnection process, and the powerful electron beam that is emitted.

Jacob

[jacob]

Well Grumpy, unfortunately this text is not 100% accurate, but still it is pretty much self explanatory, don't you think? Which is fortunate, because as someone very knowledgeable said: it contains many of the secrets.

[MarkSnoswell]

For a long time I have been puzzled by the following question from Steven:

"Rotation of field. . . How many people think about that. If you could have a field that you could think of as a big ball. And you could rotate it in two directions what would the ramifications be?"

I couldn't tell what the ramification would be at all! Reason is that I was visually picturing the "two directions" as happening in 2 different cartesian planes.

@Grumpy
A spinor is the simple answer. Sorry if I hadn't made the point before -- I thought I had. like everyone else, I dont know exactly what SM meant by that comment -- he could have just been posing a question that interested him. He could have been trying to imagine why the TPU actually worked -- who knows? However, the only way to make a ball spin in two directions at once is a spinor. ... just last night I realized another very simple field arangement that fits the TPU and spinor models. I will animate it and write up the explanation as soon as I can - if nothing else it offers a new timing method for driving the top and botom control coils and it also supports a top and bottom crossover scheme like Otto came up with for his collector in the ECD.

cheers

mark.

[wattsup]

Righto.....

The problem with what SM said is that the balls are rotating in two directions. He did not say in opposite directions. He said a ball which we must take to mean a sphere, a globe, ok, a ball.

Rotating coils in clockwise and counter clockwise would not produce a ball, but a toroidal field. A ball turning in opposite directions at the same time would not move. Any one here from the Harlem Globe Trotters?

To produce a ball from a limited flat plane perspective such as the TPU, you would require a 360 degree coil and just reverse the polarities. That's one ball. Then on the same horizon you would do the same to another 360 degree coil but placed at any certain number of degrees off the first coil. This is two balls in two directions. If the second 360 degree coil was 180 degrees of the first, it would be two balls in opposite directions.

The difference here is great since opposite directions would risk canceling each other, whereas two directions would saturate the space of rotations and potentially create enough collisions to densify into its own ether attracting gravity. Why. Because globes like the Moon only turn around the Earth and will have less gravity then globes like the Earth that turn around the Sun and also turn on its own axis. This may create a field with some centripetal effect that may have an affinity with ether energy.

Interesting.

So here's the question. How did he maintain this gyro sphere with two parts cut out of it. Ouch.

Actually, he cut two 2.5" slices at 9 and 12 o'clock when 6 o'clock is at the zero point, where the control coils meet. A 15" tpu is 47" in circumference and he removed 5" so almost 10%.

The effect of cutting the tpu could have also rendered useless that part of the remaining tpu between the two cuts, at 10 and 11 o'clock. So in effect, 25-35% of the TPU could have been rendered inoperable.

So if you knew you were going to make two cuts, how do you place your fields and still maintain the gyro sphere if this is "absolutely" needed for the energy conversion to take place? This will always be the litmus test.

[zapnic]

hello
again
i feeling little bit down
that school shooting yesterday was 10 miles from my home .

but i was thinking about sm words "power from earth magneticfield" and look videos again
and all the tpu has big loop round the tpu why?
then i was thinking where you need big loop ?
but this the magnetic shadow casting materialââ,¬Â­? is this Metal detector?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=2602.msg36959
anyway i was looking patents from man name glenn slagle "Magnetic induction imaging system"but no images "
and was giving up
then this show up
this http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT2735980