Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?

[RadiantEnRg]

Well maybe you missed exactly what it is I did. In that video Proof2, the plate you see is a stainless steel plate,one side is coated with an insulating tape....the other side is bare. It is connected directly to the battery terminal.when shorted the neon is very bright...but if parasitic C was the culprit that plate would work MUCH BETTER then my body, as it is directly coupled to battery. It only gets a little brighter so there is a little parasitic C(when I get very close), but you cannot honestly think that my body is a better coupler then that plate can you??? God I hope not......

[RadiantEnRg]

Notice I show direct contact(very bright neon), then i show Parasitic C(plate flipped over)...there is only a VERY thin layer of tape on that plate....If parasitic C was the culprit....The plate would be MUCH BETTER then ground or my body...but as u can see in the video...my NON DIRECT COUPLED body makes the neon brighter then the connected plate cap I had made......Parasitic C CANNOT BE THE FORCE here.....k circuit not grounded so ground is not a direct coupler(nor is my body)...the plate IS directly connected to battery...it is no where near as bright!...you can see that the DIRECT parasitic C coupling is rather weak compared to the neon when I touch it(again I am not touching battery at all...THE PLATE WAS!!!!)

[RadiantEnRg]

So I have no harsh feelings .... but your argument IS DEAD!!

[tinu]

Your body in direct contact with the neon lamp can be (and actually is) a much better coupler than an insulating foil. Your body?s capacitance is nF or larger. That of a foil&plate is pF at best.
Two (or more) series nF is much larger than any series with one pF?

If you want to be rigorous, place a piece on insulating foil on your finger and check again. What do you think?

One question, though: how it comes that radiant energy always likes to go to the battery? (I mean, if it is really attracted by the neon/discharge or anything else there, it should accumulate there, in that place. It should be collected, diverted etc. But no, it always tends to go back to the battery)

Glad that no harsh feelings!

[RadiantEnRg]

Ok...ask yourself what it "could" be coupling too..(the battery) That plate/film cap is connected directly to the battery k??.....the neon is soldered onto the HV...My body is NOT touching the battery...So even if my body was a better cap..which I doubt it is (as I am not connected to battery)....the plate is better simply because it IS in direct contact with battery...(the field IS ON IT).following?? See your argument is that the room is filled with batteries V field..well the battery is not grounded so it's field is localized....the direct connection to the battery makes it a MUCH BETTER path back to battery.....As for my body to better, you would have o be saying that the connection from my body through the air to the battery, then to the neon is better then the battery directly (clipped), then capacitively to the neon???...Sorry no my friend..watch this video and maybe you will see my point...p.s. My Electrical Engineer friend argued the same point as you..except, when He saw the video he immediately recognized the validay of my test and now says he needs to read how they say Radiant works, because I proved it wasn't parasitic C...anyway video here

http://www.youtube.com/v/etONSNthsSE .....oh and just so you know...Only one side of that plate is covered in insulating tape..(field directly to bare metal...surely thats better coupling then field through me then plate???)

http://www.youtube.com/v/ujgLiG7miUk ....I just made this video too..will be done finalizing in a few minutes.....tape on my fingers...no part of  my body touching battery...THIS NOW KILLS YOUR ARGUMENT