SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[hoptoad]

Continuously posting crap won't help you figure out what's what.

@Omnibus - You should take note of this yourself.

[Omnibus]

Continuously posting crap won't help you figure out what's what.

@Omnibus - You should take note of this yourself.

Stop filling this thread with crap.

I again suggest that Stefan closes this thread because there's nothing more to be discussed on this matter. Further exchange of confused posts is useless and only clutters the forum.

Next step is to see @modervador open a thread in the Steorn forum and explain to several curious posters there why SMOT violates CoE, something he already understands well.

[hoptoad]

Stop filling this thread with crap.

@ Omnibus - try practicing what you preach!

[Omnibus]

@hoptoad,

I will not stop asking you to cut out filling the thread with gibberish, be sure. Don't waste your time.

[Low-Q]

If the ball is moving from B to C, the ball vill be able to go back to A from C, on one condition: If mgh2 is less than the diameter of the ball.

I don't think this is true. The conditions for the ball to go from B to C to A without help are Mb > mgh2 and Mb + mgh1 >= Ma. I don't see any restriction on ball diameter relative to h2.

I presume you meant to compare the diameter with h2 (distance) not with mgh2 (energy).

Hi,
Yes, you're right. I meant if the ball wasn't lifted more then its diameter (its extent), then the energy difference to the ball will not be enough to keep the ball in point C, so it will go further to point A.
However, if the ball is lifted more than its diameter (its extent), the magnetic field must be stronger, and it will be too strong to release the ball.

These things can easily be displayed by experiments as well.

I meant also that Omnibus could be right if the ball in the last case would manage to release from point C anyway (Which is not gonna happen), but in the first case, CoE is obeyed anyway.

Sorry for the confusions, Omnibus and modevador.

Vidar