F.B.D.I.S.S.M - Flux.Boosted.Dual.Induction.Split.Spiral.Motor.

[gyulasun]

Hi Honk,

Absolutly amazing job! Thanks for all your hard efforts during the years and unfortunately you have not got excess energy.

I wonder what your next build is going to be, for I hope you do not give up?

Merry Xmas!

Gyula

[Liberty]

The story of FBDISSM development:
All stuff was lasercut for precision and speeding up development.
The motor was built like a pancake in layers. Pretty fun actually.

I tried several types of electromagnets, from narrow to wide with
heavy duty winding to slash copper losses to a minimum.
Each electromagnet was calculated to achieve maximum performance.
But the main problem is the induced voltage in the windings of the
electromagnet when the rotormagnet passes by.
This increases the input power by a least 4-6 times higher, perhaps
a lot more, just to be able to overcome the sticky spot.

I built 3 different controllers that recycled BEMF for max efficiency.
It made no difference with the BEMF recycling, it was still no good.
I even tried adding large N45SH magnets to the back of the solenoid
electromagnets but it had no effect what so ever on motor performance.

The videos show two of the many test runs I made during development.
The last test run with Solenoid v3.0 I achieved a puny 150 RPM.
Input power was approx 1700-1900W while the motor could deliver
approx 400-500W from a shaft load, meaning a 25% efficient motor.

My findings reveal the Magnetic Wankel being far from overunity.
I don't regret taking this journey as I have learnt a lot about magnetism.
I feel the magnetic cycle is 100% conservative as long as there is no magic
"pulse generators" coming along that can match the force field from NdFeb's
at low input while it doesn't get affected by the moving magnetic fields.

Regards / Honk

Btw, Paul Sprain has failed in his research as well.
See these links, they direct you to some statements from Terry Blanton.
His was one of Sprains engineers during development.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg37212.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg37213.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg37251.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg39527.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg36955.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg40636.html

Honk,
Wow!  I am impressed with the build of your motor.  I wanted to complement you on a very nice job!  Even if the results were not what you hoped for, the pictures show the level of time and expertise you have put into this device.  Great job.

Liberty

[FredWalter]

The story of FBDISSM development:
All stuff was lasercut for precision and speeding up development.
The motor was built like a pancake in layers. Pretty fun actually.

Just like Jack's motors, your motor is a work of art. I'm sad that it didn't work out.

[khabe]

This is great work, Honk,
Very seldom seen in OU something like that,
I cordially appreciate!
Like modest specialist by electric motors I do not want to fustigate about principles and design,
besides there are sevaral dubitable things for me 
but one thing hits promptly in to my eye ... you use incredible thick laminations for cores of electromagnets (as stator).
Today even 0.5mm laminations are too thick when speaking about motors where efficiency is over 90%  because eddy losses,
Perhaps when similar devices for an ´overunity´ then laminations need to be even much more thinner 
And ... shaft is too narrow for this large powerhouse, even ´pro rata´, not only mechanically.
But anyway - very nice work!
Took a lot of time and money I think,
Have a nice time,
Regards,
khabe

[ZeroFossilFuel]

I have to chime in here and congratulate you too, Honk. Even though it didn't work as planned, that is really impressive workmanship. And, it still looks like it may be reconfigurable enough to try other experiments with without too much effort.

Best,
Z