F.B.D.I.S.S.M - Flux.Boosted.Dual.Induction.Split.Spiral.Motor.

[wattsup]

@Honk

I am flabbergasted at the level of workmanship you have displayed in those photos. Just an incredible build.

Now I have only one question to start with.

Do you think those two coils can be pulsed enough to make the rotor turn?

wattsup

[DeepCut]

Honk ... what a great build, lovely workmanship.

Good luck in the future.


Gary.

[bolt]

Very nice build looks VERY expensive in time and materials.  All you needed to do was use off the shelf 5hp induction motor for 150 bucks and it runs on just 15 watts in RV mode! Under tuned loading the efficiency is measured at 90-97.4%.

If you add neo magnets to induction motor rotor its an OU device its simple. Becomes Synchronous Magnetic Resonance amplifier but don't over saturate the cores!  Will give leading edge power factor correction back into house mains where excess energy actually offsets meter usage and provides REAL power savings around 2-5Kw. Its loopable when driven by RV motor setup (extreme high efficiency)  and use the SMRA as generator. (OU generator)

Why do you think RC model motors can be 5HP using 3 phase with neos at 90%+ efficient, 30,000 rpm and only the size of your hand??? People need to WAKE UP and not make the same mistakes and produce expensive boat anchors LOL

[wattsup]

@bolt

Sorry but I do not agree with you about using off-the-shelf motor.

What @honk has in hand is not a boat anchor and i do not know why you guys are saying this.

The main problem is turning the rotor with the magnets and trying to pick-off energy output from those two coils. Since the magnets and the coil are at the same radius there is no advantage of leverage.

If you can make the rotor turn by pulsing the two coils as drive coils, then remove the outer magnets and remove some of the rotor magnets to tune the best rotation speed and strength, then you can make a second level where the rotor second level would have more magnets but in a smaller diameter where you can place more pick-up coils on the outer rim. If the pick-up coils are in a smaller diameter compared to the drive radius, then you can start working with a leverage advantage and work on the speed of rotation to maximize the output.

Sorry if this sounds complicated but the point I am trying to make is that if the design uses drive magnets and pick-up coils that are on the same radius, then chances are great that you will never see any major advantage.

I had posted something along those lines that will better explain it here;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7833.msg261177#msg261177

Extending the idea further, now imagine if your rotor was shaped like a cone that starts 15" diameter at the base a goes upwards a good 15" high that you mark off into 5 levels of 3" each. As you go higher, you eventually get to the tip of the cone. So imagine putting the drive magnets on the rotor at 15" diameter level 1 that has corresponding drive coils on the outside of the rotor radius. Then you go to level two and put more magnets and this time you put pick-up coils (instead of drive coils) around the outer radius, same with level three, two and one.

All the pick-up coils in levels 2-5 would produce energy output and the drive coils being on the 15" diameter level 1 would have the greatest leverage potential to keep the rotor turning while the pick-up coils generate some drag but never enough to stop the driving of the rotor. Yes, each level would produce a different output level but being DC, not of it would be lost.

Anyways, I still say great work and don't give up. I am sure @JackH would be proud to see your works. Hmmmmmm. Speaking about @JackH, I never was able to reach his wife or his brother. I tried many times but there was no answer and I am always wondering where his motors have wound up. What a darn pity if his works are lost.

wattsup

[bolt]

Does it matter what the theory you have and hold on to so dearly has been a very expensive mistake.  OU devices start with power savings and good efficiency with +90% efficient off the shelf devices are cheap and only need to find that <10% losses to make a looped system. Before others say this is not possible I tell you it is and has been done lots of times in fact there are more public signs "leaking" out on youtube. For every public disclosure there are 100 private ones. This public disclosures are a good thing! Of course some still believe these loopers are not possible but the water pump man driving a generator and lighting a 60 watt bulb is a good example of simplicity and ingenuity = looped system. Not forgetting the HHO German looper genset is another fine example.  There are many others where the COP is not so self evident but have OU.  If you are going to make a motor/generator then least do some homework on PROVEN designs and not on failed theories. 

IMO mechanical devices are NOT the way to go although everyone starts with Bedini motors and learns to go solid state along the way. Whatever a magnet and motor can do the same thing can be done static there is NO difference whatsoever. Ask Magnacoaster and Kapandaze about this they both made motors/generators and gone solid state.