Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[nickle989]

What is this about the coil? You talk about double winding and the picture looks like a transformer (more than one winding). If this is in the base, no good. single winding of at least #26, smaller is bad.

@ the Dr.  ... the top coil is wound with #28 and the bottom coil is wound with #26 .. in order for me to achieve the increase uH I needed to double up on the bottom coil half way to increase the L .... I wound 2 coils on one form as I was just trying to get it to work somewhat.  I need to get some of the other forms .. but it is not that easy for me to do ... hense the reason for me doing the other way. I did notice that the bottom coil did give a brighter result on both plugs.  Have not had enough time with a working unit yet.  I can see a stirling side of your work.

Will tighten up the circuit forsure (looks like a frankinwire design).... some of the holes on the board provided no value at all and some were way of the charts ... is there an overall value that I should be trying to achieve or a range to keep it within?

@all - Calorimeter - http://www.circuitcellar.com/AVR2004/HA3688.html ... this may be something of value to build ... I have not looked at it very closely but it looks like it could be modified to gain some decent results in the data log.  Maybe Dr. Stiffler can take a peak at it ... if the code needs to be modded I can do that and recompile it.

[Loki67671]

@All
Alright folks........the SEC boards are shipping from Dr. Stiffler to a bunch of us including universities. I would like hear what some of your intentions are when you receive it.  What do you want to do with a SEC exciter?  Have you experimented with breadboarding this circuit?

I am a test developer professionally and I will eventually get this test design correct but unfortunately it won't be fast! I have a 4 1/2 year old that doesn't care about the details of heating water. 

Call for help: We need someone with skill and experience in calorimetry and thermodynamics, yes those of you that say this is impossible need to prove it in unbiased open testing and analysis or just stay quiet, to take the lead in designing an effective and accurate method of performing the required calorimetry on the SEC exciters. Bottom line is, regardless of your bias, degrees, profession, and/or technical opinions if you haven't built and tested this device then you have no voice of any value to this specific effort. You can contact me via this forum or PM intially if so desired.

I don't know how many, if any at all, will come forward.  If I have to do this by myself then by God that's what I'm going to do! 

Best regards everybody,

Jim

[Loki67671]

@Dr. Stiffler,
As you can see I'm trying to get the formal public testing effort going. Your input is obviously welcome and needed, BUT, man your fingers and back have to be whooped after all of that assembly work and the associated ordering and mailing and processing and etc. etc. I fully understand the magnitude of what you have just done. I just wanted to thank you for all of the hard work.    Please keep us goofballs on the strait and narrow when you have the chance sir. Thanks!

Best regards,

Jim

[ramset]

DR Stiffler I noticed yesterday JDLN labs had a do it your self cold fusion [link is at top left of this Forum]  they say they made a DIY Calorimeter maybe a good contact ? you would know if it would work here better than I  Chet

[DrStiffler]

@All
Alright folks........the SEC boards are shipping from Dr. Stiffler to a bunch of us including universities. I would like hear what some of your intentions are when you receive it.  What do you want to do with a SEC exciter?  Have you experimented with breadboarding this circuit?

I am a test developer professionally and I will eventually get this test design correct but unfortunately it won't be fast! I have a 4 1/2 year old that doesn't care about the details of heating water. 

Call for help: We need someone with skill and experience in calorimetry and thermodynamics, yes those of you that say this is impossible need to prove it in unbiased open testing and analysis or just stay quiet, to take the lead in designing an effective and accurate method of performing the required calorimetry on the SEC exciters. Bottom line is, regardless of your bias, degrees, profession, and/or technical opinions if you haven't built and tested this device then you have no voice of any value to this specific effort. You can contact me via this forum or PM intially if so desired.

I don't know how many, if any at all, will come forward.  If I have to do this by myself then by God that's what I'm going to do! 

Best regards everybody,

Jim

@Loki67671
@All
Please no one take offense with any of the following as I mean (I hope) is a logical approach to what will be and is taking place.

I believe it is naive or wishful day dreams to hope for or hold out for a reputable university or testing lab to post results on this forum (nothing wrong with the forum) as it is not the venue that the community would use. You will never see an outright admission of any success if found, why, because it would be so profound that it would require decades of research before it could be accepted. If we were to see an announcement someplace of utter failure, I would be highly suspect and be so inclined to at once make ever effort to see for myself if this was the correct answer, really you should find out before.

I do not distrust all of the scientific community, I just understand that it does not work like we would hope it to. What we all look for in this (overunity.com) community is an answer to todays problems, not a solution that will take affect a decade from now, so with that feeling we are quick to judge, dismiss and accept what fits into our (hopes) goal of wanting it now to ease the pain that this energy burden has created.

You will not be happy in your own mind unless you know for yourself that a fact is indeed a fact. This is of course hard and impossible for some. I heard on tv the other day a politician make a statement about politics, 'If you don't want to fight, don't put on the uniform' A quote from B. Clinton.

So if you find excuses to stop you from finding the answer yourselves, then so be it, but remain silent in that direction because otherwise you are only repeating what you do not know as fact. I have said it a couple of times on this thread, 'People believe what they already know'. Yet it seem they are also more willing to accept the negative than the positive when coming from a third party.

I do not expect even one announcement of success, I fully expect a downpour of negatives. Some of these negatives will be real, the result of improper testing, testing in a way that would not disclose the actual desired result. Testing that was done in a way that was designed to fail. Then there will be the real failures, understanding of the system causing one or more factors to indeed cancel any and all fruitful result.

Now where and by who will these results be posted or seen or heard. I won't name them but if you have been around long enough you will know of what I speak. Places that talk of AE involving Sea Power, Solar for Every Home, Gas from Grass, you know the places that push things that even your grandchildren will not have.

I know and am comfortable. But 'you' need to do this for yourself to see, it is a bit difficult and maybe you will mis a game or two or have the wife yell at you, but if you don't, well what more can I say...........

There is no free lunch and take is cheap on the net, right....