Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Pirate88179]

Dr. Stiffler:

Excellent work!!!!!  This is fantastic!  I believe this to be a historic moment and I am glad I could be here to see this.  Please count me in when your new boards are available.  Thank you for sharing this with us.  I hope you stay here and just ignore the idiots.  They all know who they are, and so do we.

Thanks again,

Bill

[stephenafreter]

 Fantastic work Dr Stiffler !

I book 2 SEC G3, but you'll have to send them to France if you don't mind

I really find that you are showing the easiest access to Space Energy so far.

I have read thousands of documents on ZPE in the last 5 years, and your circuit is so far the smallest and simplest one I ever saw, and can deliver much power compare to the input, like in your previous experiments with tens of LED, circuits on your website. (mine is at http://radiant.100free.com and is a collection of hundreds pages on ZPE)

The latest discovery of 'coupling' a SEC with water, for fluorescent lights and now electrolysis is very impressive ... and the big plus that has you technology, compare to others, is that you make all the details accessible, when most of all other inventors always keep hidding some ...

Mr Newman, Mr Bedini and many others have very generously given their technologies to public, but they are more difficult to reproduce or scale up, and really yours looks much more affordable and promising.

As you MUST accept, all the black operators, specialists in this domain, came immediatly on your back, on this thread, to try to break your spirit and volonty. That's absolutly NORMAL, because you are breaching their dam of greed, and it's their job to trouble you. But be strong and know that it is usual, they are just trying to push you to give up.

There is also the dumb guys that don't know nothing about ZPE, so they just can't grasp what's happening, it's kind of a shock for them, they aren't prepared to understand and accept sch a thing ...

I suggest that if you don't feel the heart to make cleanning on this thread by yourself, you delegate the job to a friend of yours that could clear the place regularly ... and then you would be light hearted to concentrate on the developments of your discovery.

Also another solution could be to open a yahoogroup, where you'll be able to select the entry of members, and where you could have better control of the passing visitors ... there you have place to stock files also, and experimenters can post their photos or file ....think about it, it's quite easy to open.

Whatever you do Dr Stiffler, please please please, never give hope to make you discoveries public in the intention to help this world that they oppress.
We need such a technology as yours and you are the most knowledgeable to develop it now. So to speak we (the oppressed) need you !!!

I wish I could help you more than with simple words. Anyway thanks a lot already for your fantastic devotion.

We are many 'good' guys and girls to come here and collect information, so please, come here for us, and forget about this trouble makers and ignorant skeptics.

God bless you and your familly,
MDG

[professor]

*Deleted*
By Dr. Stiffler

[k4zep]

@ALL

Here is what you all want to see and it is indeed REAL. You have the tools now jump down and start running with them. Be creative and work fast, very fast.

If you want me back on this thread I would expect that you all will police it for me. I'm sick of the crap and I have tried so if you ever want anymore, help me on this, Ok?

Can Water Be Burned #3
* being processed by YouTube now;  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aanRgpfv144

Hi Dr. Stiffler,

Absolutely most excellent......Inverted funnel to catch the hydrogen, oxy electrode sitting off to the side!  Ingenous as heck!!!!  Your hydrogen burner is really excellent and most simple!!!!  VERY GOOD!  You are a man of your word and in this world, that is very important!!!!!

Ben

[WilbyInebriated]

This likewise thinking is exactly what go me into trouble.
I am glad that I am not alone in my thinking and it is a shame that at this time I have nothing to offer, or the shoe would be on the other foot. I  have no military Background and I am not a Yes Sir No Sir Man.
I do have the intelligence though to ask Questions of things that I do not understand.
I have a teaching certificate and one of the first rules is to tell your Student "I don't know,but I will find out for you"'.
But unless you know and reveal the  facts without theorizing, anyone can claim anything on this forum without scientific proof.
I for instance could claim to be a Professor . Sorry this  I am not, but I do have the Experience and prob. saw and repaired  more standard electronic Equipment on a daily basis all of my life than most of you here. I also know that attack is a  subhuman form  of defense,but it seems to work.
Give us the details as if you were to patent the circuit . I agree with the above that you can excite any plasma with an RF Field as most us know.
Now what Kanzius did is really unique but impractical  for splitting water as you require too much power.
To produce Hydrogen only is  the product of the catalyst not the circuit.
My respect goes out to many Inventors that have revealed the scientific principle of their invention.
If Ronald R Stiffler does not intend to patent his circuit and promised to give it to the world then by all means there is no reason in the world why he can not tell us why it works the way he claims it does.
Professor

didn't you have an intricate plan about you NOT posting in here anymore, something about the "wiser one"?

do you have the intelligence to read the ENTIRE thread before asking questions?
do you have the intelligence to replicate the circuit OR if you can't manage that, purchase one and actually DO the experiment, thereby making your own observations instead of just making assumptions on what you think you know before blabbing on about what you did on who? subhuman indeed...

"give us the details as if you were to patent the circuit"
who are you to demand it being given to you in ANY specific way? the doc can give it out in any way he so chooses.
by all means there could be many reasons the doc does what he does, numero uno being thats the way he wants it...

and as far as your teaching certificate, i much prefer the doc's way of lighting a fire (pun intended) of curiosity in his "students" instead of treating us as "buckets" to be filled with the status quo. i don't want you to find out for me, i rather enjoy finding out for myself...
professionalism? do the replication before you start yakking, that might have some semblance of professionalism, your head talking does not.
the doc's call sign is WA7RTQ, pretty obvious, and i'm not even a HAM...


@stiffler
thank you for this intriguing circuit, have been quietly following along and experimenting with a SEC15-3 and always look forward to new posts (except the ones from the talking heads) and new experiments in this thread. please put me down for a G3 and please don't let these asshats get you down. it's what they want.