Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[nul-points]

hi again

first up, an anomaly is reported - can we explain it by conventional understanding? if we can then we move on - if we can't then it's worth exploring more (the anomalous behaviour might prove useful in it's own right, of course)

i read this thread and my first post attempted to generalize the reported conditions to try and see if there might be some conventional explanation - it seems to me there might, but we need to try & get a better handle on making some measurements in order to come to some conclusions

is my approach is unscientific? i hope not

do i claim to understand electricity? i don't believe so

my experiments to explore FE have centred around the Jensen UDT & variants of the magnetic parallel path system - no anomalies to report so far, but it hasn't stopped me planning to continue the experiments

secondly, as 'scientists' i hope we all look at data for evidence of currently unexplained patterns - when we find such evidence i hope we all want to start investigating in more detail

i found patterns in the Stiffler Scientific logo - i was interested and looked for more information - i reported some of my findings

was this unscientific?

my post contains an attempt to explore a report of anomalous electrical behaviour, some observations of an interesting pattern contained in the Stiffler logo, and a link to another OU site where Google found another instance of the name 'Ron Stiffler'

you can read my post - you can read Ron's response

i'm not going to tell people what to believe - about electricity - or anything else - just search for facts and draw conclusions from them.

isn't that the scientific way?

i've been really encouraged by this site - lots of good work being done by people researching physical anomalies and sharing results - lots of good work done by Stefan in setting up & maintaining the site!

good luck everyone with new & existing experiments in 2008!
sandy

[amigo]

mramos,

logos are not silly, on the contrary they have quite a depth both archetypal and symbolical that most people ignore because they do not know or do not care (while they should both know and care because logos affect us on many levels). Whether doc.stiffler had noble (or not) intentions with this logo is not an issue, the fact is he made a logo that carried a purpose and a meaning, at least to him, to the point of becoming almost as a personal rune, and someone recognized that.

[fritz]

Fritz, the LM317 is a very popular adjustable regulator.  First thing that came to mind for someone like me "who thinks they know electronics".  ROTFL myself.

4148,741,555,317,327,2222,914,6502,8008,.....,SP1000(;-)
The ROTFL was on the spontaneous drift into numerology.
I really googled some very strange matched RCA high voltage drivers
down to the human genome project .....
rgds.

[DrStiffler]

@ Stiffy

Lets not blame the lack of measurable over unity for the lack of postings ... heaven forbid

Even my friends do not disrespect me to the point of calling me childish names.

You totally did not understand the post. Maybe read it again and see if you can do a bit better.

[DrStiffler]

hi again

first up, an anomaly is reported - can we explain it by conventional understanding? if we can then we move on - if we can't then it's worth exploring more (the anomalous behaviour might prove useful in it's own right, of course)

i read this thread and my first post attempted to generalize the reported conditions to try and see if there might be some conventional explanation - it seems to me there might, but we need to try & get a better handle on making some measurements in order to come to some conclusions

is my approach is unscientific? i hope not

do i claim to understand electricity? i don't believe so

my experiments to explore FE have centred around the Jensen UDT & variants of the magnetic parallel path system - no anomalies to report so far, but it hasn't stopped me planning to continue the experiments

secondly, as 'scientists' i hope we all look at data for evidence of currently unexplained patterns - when we find such evidence i hope we all want to start investigating in more detail

i found patterns in the Stiffler Scientific logo - i was interested and looked for more information - i reported some of my findings

was this unscientific?

my post contains an attempt to explore a report of anomalous electrical behaviour, some observations of an interesting pattern contained in the Stiffler logo, and a link to another OU site where Google found another instance of the name 'Ron Stiffler'

you can read my post - you can read Ron's response

i'm not going to tell people what to believe - about electricity - or anything else - just search for facts and draw conclusions from them.

isn't that the scientific way?

i've been really encouraged by this site - lots of good work being done by people researching physical anomalies and sharing results - lots of good work done by Stefan in setting up & maintaining the site!

good luck everyone with new & existing experiments in 2008!
sandy

**first up, an anomaly is reported - can we explain it by conventional understanding? if we can then we move on - if we can't then it's worth exploring more (the anomalous behaviour might prove useful in it's own right, of course)

So far all that attempt or do explain in conventional terms are doing so to either dismiss the findings (and bury them) or attempt to place the finding into their current frame of understanding which again results in non-acceptance because they do not understand.

Here is my feeling on how to approach this adventure into alternative and non-conformist energy research.

@Enter into it with only the basic teaching from electronics/physics and only as a guide to stop you from doing plain stupid things like burning things up because one can not calculate current or resistance. Do not enter with even the faintest thought that something is impossible. When I lecture I have a saying I use, "All things are possible, but some things are impractical". This saying does say it all in my mind and is the correct way in which to approach this so called OU/FE search.

@Entering into this field with restrictions already embedded in your mind, will result in failure of your attempt or your lack of understanding of information presented by others.

@Be prepared for 99% of your peers offering nothing but condemnation. This is common place in the normal scientific fields and has been from the beginning, yet when something falls beyond a lifetime of study and work, condemnation is extreme and ugly.

So ugly is the peer condemnation that people even attempt discredit by looking for and presenting such mundane things as the meaning of a Logo!

It seems possible to me that some people are so upset if they can not have handed to them everything that they revolt to the extreme. If one can not build something (their) way, from (their) parts with (their) idea, then it just plain must be a hoax. My answer to this is what some of the younger people of today say, "GET REAL"

If embedded Logo meaning or sinister messages diatribe turns on people in this thread then I have really wasted a lot of time here. I am not providing information here on my work to be criticized, ostracized or demoralized. I came here to offer real work results and it is up to you to duplicate, measure and apply that information in a way that will in the end benefit everyone.

Everyone on this thread needs to review why they are here. If you are here for what I feel if knowledge then you know what to do with it and how to move forward. If your here for trouble, to stand out as some genius for making up stories about a Logo or saying this or that law of science says it not possible, then WHO! are you, get out, go someplace else where you can get the kudos's you so seek.

This thread is for REAL people with needs and the desire to work with me towards solving those needs.