Working Attraction Magnet Motor on Youtube!?

[Omnibus]

Isn't X00013's attempted replication in the video response encouraging?  He obviously doesn't have it complete yet, but you can see acceleration.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRcSlp58bHo

@Omnibus - is there not acceleration in X00013's replication attempt above?

I think @X00013 is doing a good job but more is needed to get what @xpenzif's experiment appears to demonstrate. I have in front of me right now a device which makes a full turn but bounces back right at the moment when the next turn is to begin. Bumps such as this are seen in @xpenxif's video (his first run, the successful one, that is) but he has managed to overcome them somehow. This has been a persistent problem with all replications, including Torbay and the like. These devices are extremely sensitive and to accomplish even what I told you I have on my desk now isn't an easy task, let alone to have it make consecutive full turns. Mind you this, instead of screws I'm using small neos placed diagonally across the outer surface of the cylinder in four rows. This isn't what @xpenzif has done and his solution is really clever and may work. In these designs such as mine (Torbay's etc.) the closed loop of magnets generates something like "superpoles" due to the fact these magnets they differ in strength, although being of the same shape. This is fatal and can only be avoided by excruciating efforts mainly by trial and error. What's good about @xpenzif's design is that the closed loop of the magnets is avoided and each one "station" works for itself as an individual SMOT of sorts. Thus, the cooperative phenomena I mentioned above are avoided. Hope the tiny magnets in @X00013's design won't reintroduce that problem. As you know, I insisted from the get go to follow exactly what @xpenzif has done. Too bad he diappeared and we cannot learn more details from him.

[NerzhDishual]

I was not thinking that he was trying to hide anything.

Actually, I also used (with no success) small magnets on all   my screws's heads as I could not have my rotor spinning!
It behaves better = it is more "fluent" but it still does not work!

Best

[Omnibus]

Hi Omnibus,

Do you mean "xpenzif"  versus  "xpenzif."   ?
With a period at the end of the name?
I am definitely  dyslexic.

Else N?1:  I'm still wondering who the "local fool" could be? 

Else N?2: The X00013's replication attempt uses small magnets on the heads of some screws.  (As I can figure out, of course)...

Best

Go back where "xpenzif ." comment is and you'll see the post of the loca fool right after.

[NerzhDishual]

Hi guys:
My silly question:
What if (some?) of the xpenzif's screws were small = weak magnets?

You can make your own magnets with capacitor discharges (and a coil)? Can you not?

Best

[NerzhDishual]

Hi builders,

I have just found  this out: http://www.lindsaybks.com/bks8/magn/
Old Time Secrets of Making Permanent Magnets

Yes, you can make powerful permanent magnets. No, they're not going to be as efficient as modern samarium or neodymium magnets, or even the classic alnico types. But revealed are precisely the techniques used to create the powerful magnetic magazine used by Michael Faraday to invent his disc generator that so intrigues the perpetual motion and free energy crowd

.

This is perhaps the Xpenzif "secret".....
Best