Working Attraction Magnet Motor on Youtube!?

[Nostradamus2]

It will be good test, but I can suggest even better testing - first test with smot ramp, but no smot magnets. This will equate ball friction losses in both tests.

[Omnibus]

It will be good test, but I can suggest even better testing - first test with smot ramp, but no smot magnets. This will equate ball friction losses in both tests.

It's not only not a good test, it's not a test at all regarding our topic of discussion. Why are you continuing with this?

[shruggedatlas]

I see you're trying but that's not a good analogy either. Just read carefully what I explained above and try not to distract yourself with such obviously bogus analogies.

Why is it bogus?  What is wrong with assuming that if the SMOT creates excess energy, this energy ought to be imparted onto the ball as it leaves the ramp.  There is no overunity requirement (i.e. ball does not need to get back to the beginning A).  Only that the ball exit with greater velocity that it entered?

[shruggedatlas]

It will be good test, but I can suggest even better testing - first test with smot ramp, but no smot magnets. This will equate ball friction losses in both tests.

Excellent idea.  An accurate control!

[Omnibus]

I see you're trying but that's not a good analogy either. Just read carefully what I explained above and try not to distract yourself with such obviously bogus analogies.

Why is it bogus?  What is wrong with assuming that if the SMOT creates excess energy, this energy ought to be imparted onto the ball as it leaves the ramp.  There is no overunity requirement (i.e. ball does not need to get back to the beginning A).  Only that the ball exit with greater velocity that it entered?

What's this all about? I don't see your point.