Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

Started by Localjoe, October 19, 2007, 02:42:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 80 Guests are viewing this topic.

canada765


@ Joe,

So the 10's are one of the copper and one iron of the primary if I am not mistaken. Ok there should be no short in the circuit if the 5&6 are connected when the 10's are open and vice versa. It should produce more of a sine wave pattern in the secondary I would think but double the amplitude. We'd just have to build a new "make n' break" device so that when the 5&6 is connected the 10's are not and when the 10's are connected the 5&6 is not connected. It would be fairly easy to build, if you want a schematic I can do it. If my logic is off please let me know  ::)
Cheers
Steve

Localjoe

@Steve

I gotcha now i thought you meant both at the same time, not alternating back and forth.  i think a dpdt relay would do that nicely.
                                                                                                                                           Joe
GET THIS ONE - Bush wants to stop Iran from enriching uranium .. now as oberman said and others any drunk coke head can find out how to do this not just bush.

Also in reality Google has provided this info for some time.. so heres my point.

It's OK for GOOGLE TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT but not OK FOR FOLKS TO SHARE TORRENTS OF MUSIC THEY POTENTIALLY OWN> AS WELL THEIR GOODS SHOULD BE SEIZED AND CHECKED AT AIRPORTS For copyright infringement.. ?????

This is the world we live in. More concerned if some exec doesn't get his buck than if some terrorist blows us to hell..

canada765


@ Joe,

That is correct. Sorry if I did not explain it well, I wasn't wearing my 3d sunglasses  8)

There is so much about this "make & break" circuit that we don't know about that it literally (no pun intended) can make or break the operation of the device. Someone may have to experiment with a pulse generator of some sort to try to narrow down specifications that cause the device to work as designed. (So a pulse generator powering relays or something....) It would be so cool if anyone can find more on what NS was using for this "make n' break".... Otherwise it may take a lot of experimentation to see what it takes to make it work as he had intended. But maybe it will be easier than I think and I hope so  ;D
Cheers

Steve

Localjoe

@Steve

Yes for test taht would be a good setup. this thing creates its own power without any external so id like to keeep to the passive ideas or ones like the reed switch with spinning mags.
                                                                                                                                                                                           Joe
GET THIS ONE - Bush wants to stop Iran from enriching uranium .. now as oberman said and others any drunk coke head can find out how to do this not just bush.

Also in reality Google has provided this info for some time.. so heres my point.

It's OK for GOOGLE TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT but not OK FOR FOLKS TO SHARE TORRENTS OF MUSIC THEY POTENTIALLY OWN> AS WELL THEIR GOODS SHOULD BE SEIZED AND CHECKED AT AIRPORTS For copyright infringement.. ?????

This is the world we live in. More concerned if some exec doesn't get his buck than if some terrorist blows us to hell..

canada765


@ Joe

I do agree with you in that we should try to stick to materials commonly found at that time for attempting to duplicate his experiment whenever possible. If for whatever reason the device does not work as you expect then some modifications may be necessary. The "make n' break" device for example we don't know the frequency and duty cycle (on versus off time of the pulse) and worst case scenario we could employ some more modern devices to try to narrow it down and back engineer to a device that will produce the correct pulse and frequency; that is what I was getting at more or less. But I think using the KISS method is the best starting place with something like the motor and spinning mags with the reed switch...

This article about Tesla is interesting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnifying_Transmitter

particularly this part,

Using low frequency harmonic Maxwellian oscillations, Tesla attempted to develop standing waves of extremely low frequency in the Earth's electro-magnetic circuit. Based upon observations made with the device, Tesla reported that a type of Earth resonance - involving the Earth's telluric energy - could be excited with the magnifying transmitter. He discovered that the resonance frequency of the Earth was approximately 8 hertz (Hz). In the 1950s, researchers confirmed that the resonance frequency of the Earth's ionospheric cavity was in this range. See Schumann resonance

So perhaps 8 hertz is the answer for this freqnency for the make/break circuit. Anyone have any other ideas?


The other thing is if NS was using pitchblende to alter/enhance the operation of this device then that definately throws a wrench in this whole thing. I get the feeling he experimented with it "after the fact" so to speak. He may have just been trying to get more voltage or current through  the primary but of course there may have been more to it. It's also possible he could have connected more cells to the 10 connections of the primary coil to get more power going through the device but I'm just speculating here. I also think placement of the cell is important and we shold look at dowsing for "hot spots" before inserting some of these cellsl; it seems like a worthwhile experiment anyway. I need to re-educate myself more about coils, induction, L/C circuits etc. I've forgotten too much... :-[

Steve