Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[jeanna]

John,
I have a couple of links to some posts I made last summer in the datalogging thread.
In the first post I outlined how I set it up and how I wanted help with a tank and diode set up.
No one actually came forward back then, so my request still holds in a way.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7769.msg195645#msg195645 and the post following

This is separated by a few other comments and is on the next page, but it has the best pictures:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7769.msg195649#msg195649

I made a funny drawing to show what the EB with a NS generator appended to it looks like and where I am reading the meter and which wires are connected.
I will post that here now.

thank you.
I would really like some help with the diode+cap issue,

jeanna

[resonanceman]

resonance man;
You said: 

>>I was reading a book  on Terslas  work  studying for my hairpin  thread.......

I stumbled across  something that gave me another theory about  the Stubblefield battery

This  book  had a page of pictures of armatures from motors Tesla invented........it breafly explained some  of them.<<

What book was this so I can look it up?  It sounds interesting, and perhaps I could understand what you are saying if I read the book/article.

Thanks in advance.

Protonmom

The name of the book   i    " Inventions, Research and Writings of Nikola Tesla"

I do not think that  the book will help you.
I find it very dry.
It seems well written but  written by a researcher not an expermenter.
There is alot  of information  but as far as I have seen so far......no  first had experience.

It  was  just an Ah Ha experience  for me.
I have often  wondered exactly how the 2 metals interacted in  a stubblfield battery.....this gave me an idea if how it might work.


gary

[resonanceman]

@ Jeanna,

I think John is saying the radant energy is flowing, the diode channels it into the capacitor, forcing a one way flow, if he diode wasnt there it may flow backwards cancelling itself.
Then using a switch to transfer this same charge into a larger capacitor, the origin of the radant energy is pushing from behind, and a suction effect from the capacitors in front draws it into the capacitors.

Using a series (group) of capacitors we should get enough radant energy to power something with.



@ John,

Just how high can radant voltage go to? is there a limit? can it be as a thin streem or like a broad river?

Also, should we some time be thinking of using HV diodes as is used in microwave ovens? or use just sharp cutof diodes?

jim

Jim


I am not  sure that  bigger caps are the way to go.

From  what  I have been learning   the  energy we are dealing  with  is   electrostatic........ ( scaler waves )

I tried  to talk about it a little back on reply 2860

I think that the a large ground is critical.

As I understand  it  ......scaler waves travel though the  ground with little or no resistance.

They  would charge everything in their  path for a very short time.

The  ground is  fairly  high resistance..........a wire in the ground or  a large metal plate   is  very low resistance.

The metal plate or   wire would act  as  a capacitor  ......the larger the mass the  bigger the cap.
This is probably  why the  plates for the telegraph John was talking about were so large.

With  a massive  ground..........all we should  need  is a diode  and a capacitor above  ground  to catch  some   energy.

Now............if you  assume that there  is  high voltage in the upper levels  of the atmosphere  as Tesla  did......... you can  add an elevated metal plate above  your cap and  diode.........then we have a modern  version of Teslas  radiant energy reciever.

It is all starting to make sense
I  have heard that Tesla was a fanatic about grounds


I would think  that with a large  ground system  you could power a large JT directly......... then  use the JT to charge something along  the lines of a set of car batterys


gary

[jeanna]

The name of the book   i    " Inventions, Research and Writings of Nikola Tesla"

I do not think that  the book will help you.
I find it very dry.
It seems well written but  written by a researcher not an expermenter.
There is alot  of information  but as far as I have seen so far......no  first had experience.

Hi Gary,

I am glad to see you are here on the site again.

I must disagree.
That is the very  book I have read that has inspired me so much.
It is a book that includes transcriptions (word for word- stenographers could do that in the past) of the lectures tesla gave himself.
These were the lectures of 1891-1893 and the book was published in 1893.
In it Tesla describes in a great deal of detail how he did his experiments and the conclusions he was forced to make based on the results which he also describes.

If the author is a dry read, I suggest you turn directly to the lectures themselves.

Just another opinion.

jeanna

[resonanceman]

Hi Gary,

I am glad to see you are here on the site again.

I must disagree.
That is the very  book I have read that has inspired me so much.
It is a book that includes transcriptions (word for word- stenographers could do that in the past) of the lectures tesla gave himself.
These were the lectures of 1891-1893 and the book was published in 1893.
In it Tesla describes in a great deal of detail how he did his experiments and the conclusions he was forced to make based on the results which he also describes.

If the author is a dry read, I suggest you turn directly to the lectures themselves.

Just another opinion.

jeanna

Jeanna


I am glad to hear that.

I have not got that for yet.

Even the dry stuff can be of value..... who knows when 3 or 2 words will connect  with some idea in the back of your head and sudenly you understand.  ( that is what happened  with the words..... " copper and Iron  have different phases .)
If  the phase difference is enough to make  a motor run......it is probably one of the keys to what is going on with the Stubblfield battery


I guess  you could say I am back here in theory.

I left because I have no place to try my ideas........I still don't ..... so.... I am still interested.....I still have theorys......but  not much chance of actually doing anything.


gary