Rodin Theory & Coils

[acerzw]

@all

Marko Rodin has been in contact with abovetopsecret.com, it appears they requested information from him, he suggested a live camera link, and then posted his youtube videos's in response...

They are a somewhat sceptical bunch on that site, and one suspects slightly paranoid... see for yourself... http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread310026/pg

I am hopeful our approach might be taken seriously... since he is prepared to contact sites of a more skeptical nature...

Acerzw

[acerzw]

@all

A large part of the key is obviously the numbers 3 & 6 which Rodin describes the as the numbers between which everything oscillates, they as the his documentation indicates represent the two coil windings, 9 then represents the toroid centre vortex, which is the power takeoff point, where the non-ferrite rod is placed...

I suggest that we stick with a number of windings that is a multiple of 9, since it is the toroid centre vortex that we are trying to excite, it is unclear if this will make any difference to the field, but it would seem logical to make all the numeric design parameters multiples of these. I have updated the suggested coil parameters on the index post with this info.

The JNaudin circuit or something like it should probably, be used... would anyone care to look at his circuit (link in the first post index) and comment, improve on it, etc...

Acerzw

[Rosphere]

@acerzw,

Thank you for starting this topic.

I have seen several of the videos so far.  Sunshine?

I have played around with the "=MOD('cell_address', 9)" function in a spreadsheet.  (It needs to be nested in an IF statement to test for a zero remainder and substitute a "9" if true.)

I have not yet seen enough of the content to discern how these whole number games fit in with the whole coil design analogy.

Nor am I sure what he means by, ?bifilar.?  I know what bifilar means, but how is it applied in this coil configuration; does he wrap two wires at the same time filling up 2/3 of the surface area, or does he wrap one wire filling up 1/3 of the surface area and then wrap the second wire to fill the adjacent 1/3?

I may answer my own question upon further exploration.  I just wanted to thank you for piquing my interest with this topic.

Rosphere ? lurking is less expensive

[c0mster]

Looked to me like this (my interpretation) , The diagram shows a red and blue segment lets say the red is one turn and the blue 1 turn. If you think of his chart as being shown as magnified then in this case the coil appears to be bifilar. The red and blue are side by side, but if you were to build the coil to scale then you would have to slice up the blue and red into continues wraps. Thus the width and empty space are to scale. I watched all the vids and took some notes, I remember he does show his coil he wrapped, sorry can?t remember what chapter, but if you find it have a close look at it.   

C

[Rosphere]

@c0mster,

One of the first few video sequences says, "...the red and the blue are two windings...," (referring to the diagram in the video.)

I also got a better look at the coil in the video.  The two wires do not seem to have been wound together; side-by-side at the same time.

Rather, it appears that one wire was wound along side itself until a third of the surface area was taken.  Then, the second wire was wound in a like fashion.

I am pondering the construction of two identical prototype coils, set apart several feet and facing each other; perhaps in a vertical orientation or towards a particular pole--might need to try them all.  Then, pulse one coil with a low voltage sine wave at slowly increasing frequencies until a bunny pops out of the other coil.