Meyer's Resonant Charging Circuit Analysed

[Dr. Tesla]

Hi all,

The circuit is a sham if only because meyer himself is talking about some quite opposing things. Such as dielectric water, resonant frequency of water molecule and impulses. Without going into to much details, please read his patents for these, the resonant frequency of water is in Giga Hertz range. Hence none of you out there has a chance in your lifetime to make a frequency generator that will produce desired frequency and safely break the water molecule with it.

Meyer in his last patent employs a laser in order to "enhance" water production and do what? Achieve "overunity"? Read his nonsense for yourselves:

www.waterpoweredcar.com/pdf.files/section3.pdf

Employing a laser means LARGE power is needed but, oh call me a sceptic, I can't see that happening in your car.

Between an american punk and a Russian scientist, I will trust more the Russian. Kanarev has proved scientifically that H2 overunity is achievable. And he gives enough information for a knowledgeable person to experiment further. Not me, I am not a scientist, unfortunately...So those of you who do have some knowledge, pull yourselves together and stop wasting your and our time. And when you do, do not forget to write your manuals and how-to's so that we non-techos can read and replicate your success.

[Farrah Day]

Hi Doc

I totally agree with you that Kanarev looks to be a very reliable source of info, and is in a completely different league to that of Meyer.  Kanarev backs all his work up with science and relevant scientific equations - my kind of guy.

Yes, I've been over the Meyer Technical briefs and various patents many times and found them to be full of blatant errors. Errors of course, that are totally overlooked by the layman and those without sufficient grounding in science and electronics to know better. For me, Meyers lack of credibility is self-created as he clearly attempts to explain things that he does not understand. To anyone with a scientific background it is very transparent - Meyer created his own pseudo-science to fit his personal requirements and conveniently fill the gaps in his own knowledge.

At present, I firmly believe that there is nothing resonating in Meyers wfc cct. And, think that the term' resonance' is a Meyer misnomer that evolved due to the fact that he utilises a 'series dc resonant charging cct'.

All that said, if you cherry pick Meyers work and those people with similar wfcs and then cross-reference it to the likes of Kanarev, it is possible to find very interesting and useful info. The key is knowing what to dismiss as 'utter bullshit' and what to keep for further research and experimentation.

Personally, I like the Meyer tube cell setup and the high voltage pulsing, but would not trust a single word in any of his technical briefs or patents.

[Dr. Tesla]

Hi Farrah,

True, there are interesting moments when reading Meyer, but as you say, one must sift through the gibberish. And Meyer produced a lot of it. I think he was putting together pieces from left and right, whatever he thought made sense in his scheme. And then tried to fish out a couple of gullible cash cows to fund his retirement plan.

I paid a real electronic engineer a couple of years ago to replicate Meyer's cell. It didn't work. My engineer explained it simply. Distilled water Meyer suggested in his first patents is not conductive enough to help sparks jump across, the frequency is to low to break the bond between the H2 and O2 atoms, current too is to low to break the water. The cell has to high resistance to be useful. It doesn't work as the capacitor, because the water cannot hold the charge well. Nothing works. It was disappointing and since then I am highly sceptic about everything that comes from a garage lab. Unless a claimant is highly trained professional in something, in my eyes he or she is just a liar or an idiot.

What formal training had Meyer in plasma, or physics, or chemistry? Given the rubbish he was dribbling about, none. Sadly, many a gullible person falls for the religiously (as in dogma - do not question. Just believe and open your wallet) constructed BS such evil people feed them with.

[Farrah Day]

Couldn't have put it better myself Doc - we appear to be on exactly the same wavelength! 

On other forums when I've spoke up like this I've had to endure heavy onslaught from the intellectually challenged Meyer worshippers and blind fanatics, but apart from the odd 'nutball' things do seem a little more sensible over here.

I'm researching from the ground up, as you've probably seen on my other 'Research and Development' thread.

From very basic test and measurements, the most interesting thing so far, is that my ss test cells hold a charge for hours after power is switched off and is nigh-on impossible to discharge quickly.

I've just constructed a square wave oscillator cct that fires a car ignition coil. Hope to pop this across my test cell in the next day or so and record the results.

Also, I've just about finished my D14 variable modulation squarewave oscillator, which will be getting its first outing over Christmas time.

[aussepom]

Hi
       Is your square wave positive pulse only, if so drive a trannie or a mosfet with at least 400 volt working, 600 is better,  run it at about 140 Hz  preferably with three 75v , at least 5w, zeners across it.  Take a good 12 volt supply that will give you up to 10 amps, let the trannie or the mosfet switch it.
You should end up with a spark that will jump a  1-1/12 inches, close the gap and it gets fatter. I know  I have two, the best car coil to use is the ones with dropping resistor, don't use that.  Don' go any lower than 100hz or you will blow the coil.
Be careful  mine gets up to 70 to 80,000 volts.
aussepom