Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video

[Elvis Oswald]

Jim,

I have an idea that may shed some light on some of the results you are getting with HOPE.    I hope... haha
If I am repeating anything, I'm sorry.

You have a jump in power output at certain frequencies - and I am assuming that you have not yet concluded why this is happening.
So I thought I might run a little theory up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes.

I know this is not a LC circuit... but what you are seeing sounds alot like a similiar effect seen in a series LC circuit... so hear me out and think about how this might come into play - since you do have a rather "odd" arrangement of inductors in series in the HOPE.

**
In series inductive/capacitive circuits... When a state of resonance is reached (capacitive and inductive reactances equal), the two impedances cancel each other out and the total impedance approaches zero.
-and-
The total impedance of a series LC circuit approaches zero as the power supply frequency approaches resonance.
This can achieve 100-1000 volts from a 1volt power source - if the frequency is resonant to the circuit.
**

This may be waaaay off base.  But hey - there's no math to explain what you've got there anyways, right?   This has to relate in some way.

[BushWacker]

Hi Guy's,

   Well, ......... I have some good news and some bad news, and then some good news again, lol. First of all the good news. I was finally able to get some figures out of our engineering expert for the HOPE unit that I sent him more than 4 months ago. I know that it seems like you've all waited an eternity to hear the actual/true readings on the total power output of the unit that I have been talking about. It probably seemed much longer to me and I finally had enough of the waiting. I pissed the guy off and may have ruined a friendship and partnership in the process. However I figure that if someone as allegedly brilliant and highly qualified as this guy claims to be takes that long to give me a few numbers that it should take him such little effort to get, then I'm not so sure I want to work with a guy like that anyway. We don't have another lifetime to wait for someone to develop something which will enable us to free ourselves from the energy pirates and stop destroying the only planet we have right now. In the months of waiting I have gotten a good deal of negative mail suggesting that I was nothing more than a fraud or worse and I simply had to nip it in the bud before it caused people to lose heart in their own efforts and research. The bad news is that the readings that the engineer quoted were not what either of us had expected initially. For the past 6 months he has repeatedly told me that he is convinced that the device was surpassing the OU barrier. After waiting four months and paying him $400.00 I became tired of tryng to defend myself against all the accusations. I finally decided to be completely honest with my ISBP forum members and told them the real reasons for the extended delay to get these simple figures/readings. I did not disclose his name but simply stated that our alleged engineer had failed to provide any readings for us after waiting for four months. The guy's ego got the best of him and he came back revealing himself as the ass he really is. He immediately shot out some numbers and suddenly changed his tune saying that the HOPE was far from OU but that he had all the answers to how it could be made to reach the OU barrier. He came back so fast that I have to wonder if he really took any readings at all, and he said that $400.00 was not enough to even pay for the meter he required to get the measurements. And yet he was able to give us those alleged measurements only hours after my posting the real reasons for them taking so long to get. I put his name on the patent application for HOPE tech and gave him an executive seat on the board of the new company I have been trying to start up. Yet all I got in return was a slap in the face. He has his own idea's about the mode of operation concerning the unit that I sent him and seems to be stuck on the old-school way of thinking in matters of electrical engineering. He is afterall an alleged experienced engineer and I had trusted and respected his word and knowledge more than any alleged expert I have known. I would like to point out that he has agreed with me completely concerning the idea to develop more suitable core materials based upon my theory that there is a piezo-like component present in the Metglass cores that I've been using in my research. On the other hand he simply refuses to acknowledge this when describing how to improve the output with his updated design. It's almost like he has two different minds and a selective memory when he gets ticked off. I had suggested creating a torroidal shaped core out of the new piezo and high grade ferrous materials that I have mentioned developing, and now he's telling everyone that it was his idea. It certainly isn't the first time that someone has done this to me and most likely won't be the last. Personally, I find his behavior repulsive and unethical. My other new partner has done this with nearly every idea that I have told to him and is now apparently passing much of the information off on the web as being his own. Same ol - same ol I guess, and the more things seem to change the more they stay the same. I don't understand the mentality behind such behavior in people but to each his own, and who's going to care when were all dead and gone anyway. Just so that everyone knows, I have written the patent application for HOPE technologies in a specific mannor so that all current and future developments based on this idea will be covered by the existing international patent certificate. This means that as long as the U.S., military/government does not declare the tech dangerous to national security and find a way to protect the information under the guise of sensitive miltiary technology, anyone and everyone has my full permission to develop anything they like from of all this. I will gladly add the names of those who help to develop further designs and/or improvements to the existing patent and they will share the benefits equally with anyone else on that patent application. I see this as a good way to try and encourage others to do the same and share in the efforts and rewards while providing alternative technolgies to the real people of this world. I will spare the speach on how we all need to change our way of thinking in order to evolve to our higher potential because there are now many others who are already preaching that gospel. Finally, the good news regardless of the fact that the current model appears to be nowhere near the OU barrier according to our enraged engineer is, that if true, we can use the knowledge that we now need far less actual wattage to provide for lighting if nothing else. I have run several full sized 4 foot fluorescent lights/tubes throughout the entire evening and nightime until sunrise the following morning on a 9v DC transistor battery and still had a very good charge left in the batt. By purchasing a small PVC battery charger I can now fully charge that 9v battery in about 3 hours using the suns energy and run my lights the entire night completely free of the grid. I can use this even if nobody else see's the value of it and so I plan to use the remaining cores that I purchased to offer my folks free lighting as well. My step dad is a real penny pincher and will love me for it, lol. Anyways guys, at least we have what appears to be the information many of you have been wanting to know for so long. It's not what it appeared to be to me or the engineering expert up until yesterday but its still valuable information that should be posted. I am pasting the exact figures and remarks from our engineer directly below. I have deleted Bill's last name in order to protect his complete identy since he is afterall quite mad at me now, and I don't have his express written permission to use his name anywhere besides the ISBP os Project Forum. Personally I think that Bill's mind is going bad quickly, and he has reversed reality in his own mind concerning many events which he may honestly remember differently then how they actually occured. If this is the case it is a great loss to this community and I hope that Bill will choose to use his remaining time in the real world more wisely and efficiently while he still can. Bill see's me as having stabbed him in the back because I stated that our engineer had failed to give us any readings after 4 months of waiting. I don't know how much slack a guy needs to take a few simple readings with a proper meter and I was simply being honest instead of feeling like I had to make more excuses for Bill's failure to keep one of his many promises just once. Those readings cost me around $1,000.00 total which of course Bill selectively forgets. I don't know if Bill is intentionally lying outright because he is mad at me now but until now he has been the one telling me that he was convinced that the unit was an OU device and should have absolutely no problem closing the loop. If thats the case he is a liar either way in my book because he has a problem with being honest and forthright. Bill has also wanted a new RMS meter for a long time and I'm sure he can use it for many other things besides the couple of readings he took for us all. Don't anyone worry about this falling out between Bill and me over this stupid thing. If a guy feels the world owe's him that much just for one moment of his time to help towards finding some solutions to such an important thing, it's my opinion that he probably deserves to be in the situation that he is complaining about being in. One last thing, I have tried to get through to Bill that the introduction of magnets simply made no difference what-so-ever in the output readings that I was getting. I got the same readings with or without the magnets installed months ago on the unit I sent to Bill, and still get the same results on the new unit that I built using the same model core. Bill refuses to acknowledge any piezo component being present in the core material itself even though on the phone he has agreed 100% on the idea of making our own custom cores using the types of materials that I have suggested time and again. I understand a lot of things but I have never been able to understand people I guess. Anyway, enough from me eh? lol. You can read Bill's comments below.


Cheers All,

Jim

                       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

"I am Bill, the "alleged engineer", and Jim's business partner. I have tested the HOPE unit which he has sent me, and it does not break unity. In fact, it is far from it, with an input of 360 milliwatts (on one run) and an output of 36 milliwatts, which gives it an efficiency of 10%. It needs extensive reconfiguration to even break unity, which I am in the process of doing."

"What I found was a device that was put together on a purely intuitive level, with beautiful craftsmanship. I bought the required meters, most notably a 37XR True-RMS Multimeter with capacitance and inductance measuring capabilities."

"I found that the system was wired such that the coils had an inductance of 18 Henries. Guys, run your impedance formulas on that one at 2000 Hertz. I found that only one switching coil actually did anything, and it was in series with the output coils. Not a good idea. As a result of this, I had an output of 600 volts at around 3 milliamps on the first run with varying frequencies which seemed to center on 2000 Hz. Yes, that's MILLIAMPS, Jim. Check your range. Subsequent runs tested lower with fully charged batteries."

I tried to get the frequency down with the current configuration, but found that even when I disconnected the oscilllator, the thing wanted to self-oscillate at around the same frequency. I put balancing caps on the coils, but the impedance was still too high with that frequency. I asked Jim if I could rewire the model, and pulled the jumpers off and bought more materials from Radio Shack to power the coils and eliminate the feedback loop. That's where things stand now. Currently, the four coils on the outside are non-powered, and they need to have some kind of power input, possibly close to saturation. Also, the other three coils on the inside need to be powered as well.

"Here's the scoop, guys: What we're building is NOT A MEG! It is a modified Richardson generator, originally patented by Frank Richardson in tha 70's. Frank said that varying the reluctance of the two sides of the core was the key. He had a WORKING device in a VW in the 70's which he tooled around town with."

"Well, here it is, for what it's worth. Get the Richardson patent at the uspto.gov site, "Electromagnetic convertor with stationary variable-reluctance members", number 4,077,001, patented Feb. 23, 1978. Bearden's MEG is based on this patent. This patent holds the clue on how to fix the HOPE, and make it break unity. We need to SYMETRICALLY vary the reluctance of the core. One side goes high, the other side goes low. Flux follows the lines of least resistance, so first one side saturates, and then the other. Flux ping-pongs from one side to the other, and it ALWAYS sees one side with a low reluctance. Remember that, or your magnets will go dead."

"Why isn't it working now? Two problems: one, flux is not switched symetrically. It only has one point. I've been trying to get a magnetic probe to prove this, but so far the finances are not permitting it. Yes, I know, Jim. You gave me $400 dollars to work with, but that meter is $500. Until I can get some work in that'll have to wait. Remember I'm donating my time for free on this one, and cut some slack."

"The other problem is the metglas core. It's already in a low-reluctance state, so it's like trying to turn on a switch that's already closed. Look at the position of the internal coils, and contrast it with the Richardson patent. If you try to saturate the cores, you can't get any more output. SO we need to vary it from where it is, to a higher reluctance. We do this by powering the exterior coils... all of them. First one set switches on (on one side), putting the core into a high reluctance state, and then they switch off and two internal coils switch on-- on that same side.. Why do this? To get rid of the residual magentism in the core which will raise the reluctance. If some of you out there say that it looks like we're building an inverter, BRAVO! You got the point. We do this sequence first on one side, and then on the other."

"This is what I'm doing right now. If Jim decides he wants the unit back after releasing this information, so be it. You geniuses out there run with this and see if the theory is valid and let me know if it works. But remember the Richardson patent is the key. BTW: Jim, I told you about the problem with the core, and that a toroidal geometry would tend to fix this."

"It would look like the Greek letter theta, with the magnets in the middle. Doing this would also produce a rotating magnetic field. Imagine this as a rotor, and you get the idea. Also, the torus would vary the curl-free A potential, which you can do all kinds of wonderful things with much to the consternation of the EE crowd. So if Jim want's it back, fine. It's time to start on a new configuration. Also, I already have a working theory for a Coler device anyway that needs to be built, and it's being put off working on the HOPE. Jim knows this as well."

"I'll be tinkering on this tonight after job hunting this afternoon. Sorry if you don't like that Jim, but those are my priorities."


Take Care,

Bill

[BushWacker]

The attached pdf file is a paper which Daniel Jackson sent to me today and wondered if I would think it worthy of posting, lol. Daniel seems to understand the concept of my latest work very well and HOPEfully it will catch on with others in a big way (Punn Intended). Haven't had time to go over all of Daniel's work yet and I am not big on circuit design but maybe someone here can understand his circuits and explain them in common English, German, or whatever.

[hartiberlin]

Hi de Lanca,
sounds impressive !
So you have a COP of 1750 ?

How is your Magnet-Transformer working ?

Some kind of overunity transformer ?
Does it use Neodym magnets ?
Simular to a MEG ?
Do you have a selfrunning system ?

Please let us know more !
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Hi de Lanca,
yes, of course COP=175 , was a bit late in the night when I saw this.
Can you post a picture of the device ?
Do you still want to patent it, or what do you want to do with it ?
Please let uis know more and when you expect to release more infos.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan-