Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



"Self Running 900 Watt Fuelless Electrical Generator" Is this new?

Started by bourne, December 16, 2007, 11:07:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

one

Quote from: nightlife on March 19, 2008, 01:59:43 AM
one, no, but a vibration had to have started it.

As far as the universe being all energy, I cant agree or disagree but as long as there are vibrations, there is energy and if there isn't vibrations, then there can not be energy.

Energy being a vibration makes a whole lot more sense then it being electrons.


Personaly  I don't see  it as simple  as an electron  being  a vibration ..........what holds  the vibration together ?

What makes it  move  through  some  solids easier than others?   

Why  does electricity  move through  copper much easier  than  through air ?



I  got into  this conversation  when you  said


Quote
A movement can not be made with out another movement taking place first. The movement can not be made to create more energy then the energy used to move it.


A vibration is a movement .       now you seem to be saying that all   movement  started  with a vibration ...... yet .......... you said   the movement  can not be made to  create  more energy than the energy used to move it.

If the  universe  started as a vibration.........and then  became all the motion we now have ............it seems to me that there is very little EXCEPT  over unity .

If  you think about it ....... there is a a very small part of the universe that  " educated " people  tend to see as static  and  unmoving.. We   happen to  exist in that  domain.    If   you  look either larger or  smaller    it seems everyone agrees that  everything is moving. ...............how  could  it be possible  that  there is  less motion at the exact level that "physical  life" exists ?   





gary

one

Nightlife

Just  an observation

If you are going to ask  people to stick  with what is real and provable  ,  then  jump right  back into  your  unprovable  theorys   as if  they are  the only  truth  you   are going to  get alot  of  people thinking  of hot  air  or worse.


gary

allcanadian

@nightlife
I would agree with much of what you have said, my point is that many times we state our opinions as fact to be heard and I have made this mistake as well in the past. But opinions are not facts until they are proven in the real world thus opinions should be stated as opinions.

@bulbz
QuoteIf there is (as you say) "no proof of an electrons existence", how does one explain HHO or Browns-Gas ?. Aren't these produced by applying a voltage, that is said to pull on positive and negative electrons ?.
I believe that no one has ever seen an electron, they have measured something but have no understanding of "what" this something is. It could just as easily be a standing wave giving the illusion of substance or tangible matter so I think we should keep an open mind.
One thing we do know is that electrons give the appearance of having a negative charge relative to protons considered positive. I had an interesting thought on this the other day, take a bar magnet---it has a north and south pole and directly inbeween these poles is the bloch wall a point of no magnetism. If the electron is negative and the proton positive and the neutron neutral then maybe the neutron has no existance-- it is the "bloch wall" between electrons and protons. If the neutron is possibly just a field boundary condition between charges mistaken as "something" then why not electrons and protons mistaken as matter as well.
Knowledge without Use and Expression is a vain thing, bringing no good to its possessor, or to the race.

one

Quote from: allcanadian on March 19, 2008, 10:00:42 AM
@nightlife
I would agree with much of what you have said, my point is that many times we state our opinions as fact to be heard and I have made this mistake as well in the past. But opinions are not facts until they are proven in the real world thus opinions should be stated as opinions.



Allcanadian   

I agree
It seems to me it is a little disrespectful  to  consistanntly  state  your  opinions as if it is  truth.    We all have opinions ........... mine  opinions are just as important as   any other persons  opinions.


Another little point
  there are quite a few " proven facts " that are really  only opinion. 
One  example  is  OU.   We are taught it is  impossible  in order to keep  the greedy in   power.

OU  is not easy .......but  I can't  accept that it is impossable.    the entire universe  is OU   ...........in my opinion


gary

nightlife

Bulbz, "If there is (as you say) "no proof of an electrons existence", how does one explain HHO or Browns-Gas ?. Aren't these produced by applying a voltage, that is said to pull on positive and negative electrons ?."

I am sorry but it could also be said to pull on a positive vibration and a negative vibration which would make more sense.

one, "what holds  the vibration together ?"

Resistance

"What makes it  move  through  some  solids easier than others?"

Resisistance levels of the solids they pass thru.

"Why  does electricity  move through  copper much easier  than  through air ?"

I am not really sure if that is correct. I think it does move through air easier becuase air has a lot less resistance then copper or any other substance. I think copper just holds it together better.

"A vibration is a movement .       now you seem to be saying that all   movement  started  with a vibration ...... yet .......... you said   the movement  can not be made to  create  more energy than the energy used to move it.

If the  universe  started as a vibration.........and then  became all the motion we now have ............it seems to me that there is very little EXCEPT  over unity .

If  you think about it ....... there is a a very small part of the universe that  " educated " people  tend to see as static  and  unmoving.. We   happen to  exist in that  domain.    If   you  look either larger or  smaller    it seems everyone agrees that  everything is moving. ...............how  could  it be possible  that  there is  less motion at the exact level that "physical  life" exists ?"

I do not have all the answers but I feel that answers should be based within the realm common sense. Common sense tell us that something can not move unless something moved it. Then you have to use common sense when trying to create something from nothing. It cant be done. You can not create something from nothing. You can not get more then what you use. It may seam like it but you have to consider what is not seen that had to be added to make it look like you got more then you started with.