Steven Mark`s TPU

[otto]

Hello all,

I cant be quiet!!

Im reading dfros post.

He mentioned Tesla, Bedini?, Bearden and "dipole".

Tom Bearden is using the word "dipole".

dfro said that the electrons pile up and THEN are switched into the circuit WITHOUT destroying the dipole. No current, when the pulse hits the coil!!

OK, I have readed in the past every single word from T. Bearden that I could find on the web.

Just goodle jlnlabs and look at the "final secret" from Bearden and there is an "Additional information"...with 2 schematics.

Any comments??

As always, Im OFF line during the weekend because I have a nice toy: my TPU.

Otto

[Rosphere]

...OK, I have readed in the past every single word from T. Bearden that I could find on the web.

Just goodle jlnlabs and look at the "final secret" from Bearden and there is an "Additional information"...with 2 schematics.

Any comments??

Ah, yes, Tom Bearden; the seething vacuum via quantum physics.  His work fits in nicely with the plasma universe concept.

I have seen his schematics before; with the double-pole, double-throw switch to tap the E before the B develops and switch the energy over before destroying the dipole with current,... or something.  It was lacking any detail on how to move this switch when I saw it earlier...

Cut short again.  Time for work.  A blessing and a curse, is it not?   

[ronotte]

Otto,

"dfro said that the electrons pile up and THEN are switched into the circuit WITHOUT destroying the dipole. No current, when the pulse hits the coil!!"

this means according to T. Bearden: charging a capacitor, open the circuit (don't destroy the dipole) and then discharge directly the capacitor onto our 'Input coils'.

In our TPU you would need to do it at the 3 freqs...I wonder if technically is possible?  Standard solution is the 'flying capacitor circuit' showed also by the same T. Bearden and showed on the papers you mentioned, but I doubt to be able to run it till 245KHz.......I may give it a try.

Roberto

[otto]

@Roberto,

your thoughts are ok.

@All

To more confuse the people here:

.....very quick high voltage pulses, said dfro.

My comment is: like discharging a capacitor into our TPU.

OK guys, a question:

What happens when you quickly discharge a capacitor into the TPU wires??

On Monday I see maybe the right answer.

Im posting in this way because I want a discussion and then we are maybe a step closer to the TPU.

Otto

No, Im not brighter then the people here. Im still a little man from a little country,ha,ha.

[Gustav22]

....discharge directly the capacitor onto our 'Input coils'.

In our TPU you would need to do it at the 3 freqs...I wonder if technically is possible?  Standard solution is the 'flying capacitor circuit' showed also by the same T. Bearden and showed on the papers you mentioned, but I doubt to be able to run it till 245KHz..

Hi,

as you know I have no real knowledge about electronics. But maybe you can trigger the discharge-cycles at a slower speed/rate/frequency than the charging cycles !?
For example:
If you have 3 freqs:
35kHz
70kHz
245kHz
you could try the discharge at a common denominator of these 3 frequencies.
i.e. at 35kHz or even go to the "lowest common denominator" of these 3 frequencies, which in this example would be 7Hz for the discharge cycle.
The discharge cycle just needs to be harmonic and be phase locked with the charging cycles.

Could such a "frequency reduction" also be the way to "control the beast"?

Maybe in a properly tuned TPU the relationship between charging-frequency and discharge-frequency does auto-adjust !?
My dream is to "fabricate the 3 frequencies out of one basic frequency" through relation of the dimensions (i.e. circumference and lengths) of the wires/coils.

edit PS:
I was thinking a bit more about the relationship between length of CCs and length of collector coils.

Otto and Roberto have both confirmed the importance of the frequencies:
35 kHz and
245 kHz.
We know that 245 equals 7*35.
If we want to achieve a closed loop we will have to  feed the TPU with only one frequency instead of 2 or 3.
The frequency or signal which goes in must be the same as of the signal which is derived at the output.
I think the operation of the TPU in a closed loop must be based on the "circle of fifth" (DE: Quintnezirkel, IT: circolo delle quinte), as this system presents a closed loop and was discovered a long time ago. It is also directly related to geometry and many patterns of development/growth which can be found in nature.

The basis of the "circle of fifth" is the octave. An octave represents a frequency and the double of this frequency.
An octave is divided into basically 7steps.
This division by 7 has to be achieved in and by the TPU itself through the choice of the right wire dimensions. The lengths of different CCs (i.e. the distances of signal travel and their inter-relationships) are a factor which directly influences the resulting frequency mix.
In "electronics speak" one could say that the choice of wire dimensions directly influences capacitance and self-inductance.

So two mathematical relations of frequencies and wire lengths seem most important:
the first is:
1) basic frequency * 7 ( see above)
and the second is:
2) basic frequency *2^n, (to produce the octaves of the basic frequency).
"Octaves" is a way of saying that the next multiple always has to be double of the one before.

So I want to wind a TPU like this:
I determine the length of the collector and take this as the basis for all following calculations, because the collector length (Col_length) is directly related to the circumference of the TPU.

Then the length of the first CC (Lcc1) should be:
Lcc1 = 2^n*Col_length (that is the first octave or any higher octave)
Length of the second CC (Lcc2) should be:
Lcc2 = 7/12 *Lcc1
or 0.618*Lcc1 (that is the quinte)
Length of the third CC (Lcc3) should be:
Lcc3 = 7/12 *2*Lcc1
or 1.618 *Lcc1

Maybe I will try to wind all 3 CCs so, that they have equal mass. This means that the longest of the CCs has to be made of the thinest wire.