Steven Mark`s TPU

[wattsup]

@Otto and @Roberto

Good works to both of you as always. The OU Duo rides again!!!

I will do a build soon given that in 2008, I would like to first extend my understanding beyond or before a build and I am elaborating certain possible changes to the design concentrating more on the non-PS aspect given my EE limitations, non-PS is right up my alley with the mini-TPU design.

I am wondering about a few things if possible to test on your units and report as this will give a better idea on how to make my build variations. With several build variations and accumulated results, I think all will have better progress. Hope you agree.

So here are some questions.

1) Have either of you checked the peripheral mag field with a compass to try and trace any evident north/south polarities. Also check with the device on its side or vertically placed.

2) Is it possible to try any frequencies in F1 and F3 and send a 2-6 vdc pulse into F2.

3) Can you try the following in F1 and F3 with your current builds.

F1= 258 F3=5607
F1= 35000 F3=35007.XX
F1= 35000 F3=41000
F1= 1 F3=8.XX
F1= 60 F3=67.XX
F1= 3600 F3=3607.XX

4) Can you identify the voltage range of the frequencies you are using to feed the device.

5) Can you provide the ohms values of each F1 to F3 and mobiuses and do you have any idea on the wire lengths used. (for Erfinder calculations).

6) The only place on this build where all three coils will crossover is at the base. Is it possible to skin one of these intersections (base center opposite the zero point) and compare what you see on the scope at your regular location to that intersection. If you do not understand this, that's ok, it is not critical.

7) Is it possible to isolate F2 and put it on the scope, put F1 and F3 in series, send both frequencies to the start of F1 and scope at the end of F3 and compare this with the isolated F2.

The difference with Bearden is that he is using an armature to store energy and also displace energy between the coils. Item #7 above would show if such transfer is possible without an armature and with only frequencies going through the same side.

I am also convinced that the OTPU also used Beardens mag field shifting within the two discs. However it is done, shifting, mag field displacement, etc., if you have a real magnet in the system, on the relaxing part of the cycle, the mag field will always come back to the original field position. So one field pushes the mag field out, relaxes and the mag field returns automatically (free return). It is to be seen if such a scheme is possible with air cores and if the effect between frequency driven coils is substantial enough to promote a loop.

Last test like #7 but colliding the frequencies.

8) Is it possible to isolate F2 and put it on the scope, put F1 and F3 in series, send lowest frequency to the start of F1 and highest frequency into end of F3 so that both frequencies will meet in the middle (at the series connection) where you will scope and compare this with F2. By adjusting the frequencies, you should be able to find those that will meet at the series connection with the highest bang.

Note that some of the above tests do not consider the mobius at this stage since all I want to know is the dynamics of the coils and not their effect on the mobius loops. So these are just some ideas I was curious about to consider any possible changes to this design. In particular, what if the cork was replaced by the same material Bearden used for his armature. I know it was not a standard laminated core.

Otto, on your last question of cap discharge, I have done this many many times (manual cap discharge was my fort? before EM's mini-TPU. lol) and you will feel the kick and possibly hear the pop given those loose verticals. It would be good to test with all coils in series, first F3, to F2, to F1 and send the discharge from either end and check voltage on the mobius. There are so many possibilities.............. I'll have one soon.

Again, great works.

[ronotte]

Hi Wattsup,

I'm happy that you are rising interesting questions...!!! Let me think a little and I'll do my best to answer

Thanks

Roberto

[Motorcoach1]

@ otto - dischargeing the cap into the coils the, coil contracts shifting the mag field , doing this in fast timeing vibrates the mag feild (unstable) now we have the coil contracting and the controls going in the oppisite direction very fast!  now thats a heater ...... then it reversis mmmmm oh then we have to deal with the high voltage spikes going no where ......does this sound like an elctronic slinky...

[ronotte]

@Otto,

HI!!!

.....THE BEAST NOW DOES AUTO-OSCILLATE WITH A ROCK STABLE FREQUENCY OF 22.222KHz, presence of a component just over 200KHz is also evident

It does need only a brief kick from a small battery or just few oscillations from one oscilator to keep alive and stay alive continuosly even with the load connected.

Only the PS is connected: +12V @0.36A

The signal you see (Zero line on centre) is taken differentially across the lamp. The lamp itself is just a little reddish (first Pic).

Then I rised the PS voltage to 40V @1.34A: now the lamp is at half power......autosustaining...note the vertical scale (second pic);

The freq is very stable and it does correspond to the device own resonating frequency.

Roberto

[BEP]

I'm sure you have checked this but the question will be asked. Is it possible your power supply is the source of the frequency? A switching power supply has done-in more than one researcher.

(Yes, I know you have invested in a great PS)

Where you are now I would be pulling my battery from the car to confirm or using some lantern batteries in series.

------------------

I think you now have a magnetic oscillator! This alone is RARE success.
BUCK --> BOOST --> CONVERSION --> REPEAT  <?>

Does the natural frequency change when a magnet is nearby?
Does the frequency change (especially the 200kHz component) with time of day? (you probably need time to answer this