Steven Mark`s TPU

[ronotte]

@Wattsup,

I apologize in delay answering to your questions, so I try now:

1 - I've cheked in the past the magnetic field around (3D) the ECD: very, very interesting,  not yet for TPU V10-7.

2 - YES it is possible.

3 - YES it is possible.

4 - I do not understand what you are asking. Please detail better it.

5 - YES, for the moment I can say that: bottom mobius wire-lenght is 5 meters, middle 6 meters and top a little more than 7 meters all Twin wire lamp-cord 0.75mm diameter.

6 - NO when you are finished you cannot have access to TPU interior coils.

7 - YES it is possible as I've run all the coils onto Terminal blocks, Yes I can also reverse the input coils connections in order to make colliding fields.

8 - YES , like 7

Of course it will take lot of free time that now I don't have, but it's a meaningfull set of tests that should be tried as soon as possible.

Roberto

[BEP]

@Ronotte

On your question about turns:

I am finding things true, in my coils, that I cannot find documented. This does not mean it is new.

As far as resonance goes keep in-mind LMD is part of this. LMD speed is changed by the potential and the transit mass. Big pipe=low flow - small pipe = fast flow >> if the volume traveling is the same. TEM uses velocity factor and length. LMD version of velocity factor appears to be derived from potential, conductor mass and volume.

My control coils are not the same as yours. Mine are one conductor wrapped back upon itself in the opposite handedness with equal turns each way. This creates better cancellation between turns but stronger perpendicular induction into the collector AND no visible BEMF (60 mHz Hameg or Tektronix 100 mHz digital - probably there but not visible unless the coil is wound normal).

I found the collector frequency is a result of the ratio of turns between the collector and control AND the wire size of the collector AND the voltage applied. So, Yes! The resonance is a result of the circumference. Not just the outer circumference but also the inner.

I must make this all clearer in my own mind before I dump all of it onto you. There are still some aspects that I must repeat to confirm.
------------

The question about the heatsink is because in the early 90's it was found the new(current) MOSFET design would go into conduction if the magnetic field (surrounding the MOSFET) approached zero. Most answers are theory as to why but it usually happens when a dielectric charge buildup occurs on the baseplate (maybe because of weakening mag field?)
MOSFETs have not been true MOSFETs for a very long time. -- My understanding is they do not have a metal oxide substrate. The only ones that do are made by IBM or found in old motor drive controls.

So it may also be possible a passing dielectric field is triggering or modulating the MOSFET. Your idea about gm is still more likely.

[turbo]

 

[BEP]

Exactly!

1AX2's do well also

Edit>>>>>>>>

I'm starting to believe the story of the tube and kick is both an example and an analogy of the key function of a working TPU. (DUH!)

Not only are they miniature particle accelerators they are also energy converters. Electricity goes in one end, is converted to dielectric and back to electric before going out. There is no control except when the energy is dielectric. The speeds of either are completely different. Their reaction to magnetic fields is completely different.

The idea of activating a cathode on my bench to cause dielectric flow from 200 KM above my head is a little worrysome.

[Bruce_TPU]

(snip)
The idea of activating a cathode on my bench to cause dielectric flow from 200 KM above my head is a little worrysome.

Hey BEP, I have not laughed so hard in a very long time!!   

So TRUE, but SO funny!

Bruce