Muller Dynamo

[penno64]

Cheers NP and thanks.

Penno

[penno64]

@All,

Well I finally got me hands on some 7 strand fairdinkum (real) litz. I don't know the sizing but
my feelings are -

          **** Litz is to coils what Roden is to toroids! ******

I can just about short the DC side of the double bridge (2 x 21w 12v lamps in series ~ 2ohms) and very little slow down.

Just wish I knew how he pulled the higher voltages. I am sure it ain't speed. Maybe someday he will
fess up.

This litz works far better than home made multistrand. I guess it is the twist or twirl in the real stuff.

You know I didn't realise these new microwave ovens with the inverter instead of the massive
transformer, have a good quantity of 7 strand litz as the inner winding. The outer winding, well I
just gave up trying to count the strands.

Gotta find any easy way to get the coating off and meter then solder up the 4/3 bifilar.

Chow, Penno

[yssuraxu_697]

I also added an AC cap of 6,8 uF in parallel like marius just did...

Hi, nice work! Is the cap connected like A or B?
And did you find it more efficient with or without cap then?

[Tudi]

@ltBolo: If there is any magic then it is not in conventional physics. Conventional physics says you have input energy and output energy. In the road of conversion you have some losses so ouput = X * input (where x < 1 )
You can break the energy in any form you wish, at the point of summing them up you should have the same result. That includes active and reactive power ( the vector sum is the input power ). My point is that this approach does not have any meaning to be used when searching for OU.
What could be done is to create lots and lots of practical combinations of experiments and simply observe what is happening. If there will be some magic then it will be either something anti intuitive or something that is really hard to tune. We are talking about something that has not been "observed" officially by anyone ( unoficially yes ? ). So when romerouk said he adjusted distances for 1 whole month i think that could be considered very little time. What bothers me he never seemed to properly explain what he was searching for while tuning. Yes, he said the speedup under load. But that does not seem to lead to OU and cannot be scaled, there must be more then that.
My personal conclusion is that it's pointless to use more then 1 pickup coil as long as you have no idea what you are looking for. You just create a lot more parameters to test and eventually drive yourself mad.

Reactive power is one of these magical things that people want to get rid of in real life. It was probably investigated multiple times how you can get rid of it. But was there any investigation how to take advantage of it ? Was it investigated if it can give advantages in any sort of way ?

My only belief for this  device to achieve OU is to be related to some specific harmonics. That means stable frequency, stable RPM, stable resonating components. This field was vastly explored though.

[d@rkenergy]

A friend of mine told me yesterday:
Do not try this works!

If you make a machine that produces the free energy, can distort the balance of energy in the universe. and as a result can be a very big disaster ... is this true?