Muller Dynamo

[maw2432]

that video by Cody Gillespie is "coil shorting" in most basic form and he uses just a reed switch to do it.
If you want to use solid state swithcing (reeds blow up easily) you have to use mosfets, since they are very low resistance switches, and do a few in paralell so that your resistance is very low too to make it work better this is very important to have low resistance.
Also i like to make the mosfets "bidirectional" (connect gates and source leads then switching happens between the two drain leads)
This is way to switch AC with mosfets and when you coil short, that is what you are doing -
however that said, Sonedi doesnt use bidirectionl mosfets and he says his circuit works great so who knows anything for sure until you try it out....

So here is my tried-a true circuit to do coil shorting, but it doesnt show any mosfets in paralell - but they are shown bidirectional...
Use a 4421 driver, not a 4422 since it will be normally OFF swtiches ON
It doesnt show a "two stage" output circuit, where the cap is disconnected from the coils when the cap hits load,
and this circuit posted also has an AC cap in series on leg of FWBR, that you might not need or want, but it works like a "high-bypass" filter and cuts out lenz lug all on its own - higher uf value in the cap lets more high-end juice thorugh that fills cap, but you will probably get some lug happening as if a big cap fills, lesser uf value in that AC cap blocks the juice much more and also cuts down lenz lug to nothing...so you have to find best uf value and balance for your system
Probablyy better to do with two-stage circuit instead maybe use both you have to try it and see what works best...
dont necessarily need the 2807 mosfets either and go with higher voltage types too so nothign gets snuffed out....all depends...
keep pulse width that shorts coils at peaks NARROW say 1ms or 2ms at 60hz as an example...When you short right at peak the rotor doesnt care which way to lug anything, so doesnt, is my simpleton theory why that is sweet spot in rotation...for sure peak period gives most voltage out into cap too.
Expect gain of voltage X20 if using a small uf size "collector' DC cap as compared to what the coil "normally" makes in voltage, so that is what to size components like diodes to, so nothing blows up.

current is what manifests when cap hits load you shouldnt "lose" any current in trade-off for the much  higher voltage in the caps from coil shorting - how high you fill cap and pulse width to load and the resistive load iitself and frequency of pulses into load will decide your current that you get showing on a meter...

Also look a few pages back of simple circuit that Sonedi posted he modified from a tesla site (reply #3970) - this looks really great and is different than mine - he uses single mosfet and couple of 4007 diodes but it is triggered off rotor-mags and is not "continuous" short but switched...he says it speeds up motor and has tons of power not sure any details jsut what he wrote but this might work even better dont know but if I were you guys I would jump all over that circuit Sonedi put up, for the romero replicator rigs being tested now. He says its working and speeds up rotor and has tremandous power so that is what you want eh

Thanks for posting your circuit. 
Interesting.   Sonedi says "it is working"  I wonder if he has self-runner?   His posted circuit is modified and using only the right side.   I would like to see a cleaned-up circuit diagram  with Mosfet type or P/N but that is a lot of wishing ha ha.

[Dave45]

I am sorry I had to log in with a new UN.

Just to tell you - its working and obviously really simple. Have a look at the diagram - only the right part. The trafo is your coil. Just put a cap in parallel with your single coil with about 3uF and instead of the CR1 you put a mosfet there - switched from a hall in syncron with the rotormags. Use very short interruptions. For CR2 you use two 4007 diod in parallel. On the output you have about 20000uF. And now you can see under load it speeds up and the output is tremendous. With the mags on the coils you get more amps. I got the idea from http://www.teslaco.com/technology.html
Now you have the out of phase manner and that's the solution.

Could someone put this into a schematic for us dummy's 
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3842.3960

[e2matrix]

Could someone put this into a schematic for us dummy's 
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3842.3960

I looked at it but I'm not sure on the mosFET.  Does anyone know who Sonedi is or was?  He said he had to login with a new user name (maybe lost password) but who was he before?  Sonedi = ediSon as in Edison the arch rival of Tesla?  I just like to know who is helping here. 

[bolt]

[author=Jdo300 link=topic=3842.msg293827#msg293827 date=1309756209]
Hi Bolt,

Thank you for the refocusing information. As many here know, Itsu and I have been doing tests to see the difference between series and parallel capacitances in our setups. So far our results have been agreeing very well.

That is good.


However, in my case, there are three specific things that I have yet to try. One is the use of  bifilar-wound coils, the second is the biasing magnet on the back of the cores, and the third is ensuring that the coils exactly cancel out any normal induced current.

You really must do all these things.

In my original setup (where I had the coils wired in series-canceling), I still had a small induced current in the coils as the magnets passed by (though it was substantially reduced compared to the series-adding configuration).

Sure as within coils as bucking mode they attempt to cancel the phase between themselves but sometimes this is far from ideal as hand wound mismatch will create unbalance between the coils. They can be matched using caps as Romero said.

I am very interested to explore the electrical/dielectric side of the equation. One thing I wanted to ask you is if we were to just wind a bifilar-canceling coil, would that work just as well as having two bifilar coils in the bucking configuration?

Could be a lot better as localised induction within the coils are cancelled out. This may work better making sure the coils are basically NULL induction within themselves rather than allowing a global combined effect to take place between the coil pairs. Several pairs of Bifilars can be used and "ganged" using diode plugs on and for EACH pair. Romero already hinted at this as his "special coil". Each bifilar coil will see the very same ambient induced magnetic pulse which provides copies without degradation. Don Smith spoke a lot about this. 


If it is the electric component of the induced field that we want, wouldn't the bifilar canceling setup get us both the perfect current cancellation due to normal induction + the added benefits of having the coil behave like a capacitor?

As i said this is very possible.  All OU electrical devices are highly reactive to create a tensor without actually allowing current to flow. As SM said "its a means to an end". Thane HV coil becomes a high VARS electrostatic capacitor within certain narrow band operation. If he drops RPM to low or too high OU is not seen. For Thane lets say its an "OU effect" becuase without real power in and out measurements we don't know for sure yet we can see RPM increases and load lamps fully lit while i/p consumption drops off very low

The only thing I haven't considered in this case is the interaction that the core will have in the system due to the re-gauging that you mentioned. Any insights/clarifications on these two points would be quite helpful as I am prepared to wind a new set of coils to get to the heart of this principle.

Re-gauging is about rapidly flipping the core domains back to neutrality.  Its the core spin domain flips which interacts to the ambient as a proxy device. This is why high permeability cores like Mu-metal have a much greater impact on the process.

Kapanadze device is very very similar! Certainly in the case of SR device. Ferrite core domains are taken to saturation then switched off using HV electrostatics as standing wave form as high VARS.  Current is zero while voltage phase maintains max node.  Ferrite changes isotope under Nuclear Spin Resonance collapse creates a huge magnetic pulse and we never put a cost on this effect. The ambient provides this as heat is taken from space.

- Jason O

P.S. Here's the video links to my recent experiments once more for those who haven't seen them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVRPrCIA-IU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Qqcq-lbP8A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsePRUlrcAE

[konehead]

Here is the sonedi circuit re-drawn to how he says to do it but not sure about a few things like mentioned in notes