Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 290 Guests are viewing this topic.

Scorch

I am of the opinion Romero's design does have a lot of potential.
BUT I also believe chances of success are going to be a lot better if we try bringing the coils closer together or use larger diameter magnets.
This should improve 'coil saturation' and I think I had my coils way to far apart in my previous builds.

If I am going to use the same .750" diameter magnets, the coils do need to be a lot closer like they are in my mini dynamo build.

I imagine a similar design, with the same 10" stator plates and 8" rotor, but the magnets, and coils, are a lot closer together which would provide a far better better '"flywheel" for kinetic energy and also mechanical advantages (leverage) with a large disk but magnets near center.

Just my thoughts anyway.
And, maybe someday, I might try that again.
I never have, really, tested all the possibilities of this thing.

Yes, I am guilty of being very lazy and not, always, motivated to face the challenges of all the different configurations, materials, experiments and unknowns. . .
I want somebody to provide a clear, and concise, plan complete with specific drawings, parts list, and schematic for a complete system that actually has been replicated a few times. . .

Please forgive my lazy tail.

}:>


Quote from: T-1000 on May 08, 2013, 05:23:16 PM
http://pesn.com/2011/05/11/9501823_Romeros_Self-Sustaining_Muller_Dynamo_Drama/selfrunning_free_energy_device_muller_motor_generator_romerouk_version1_1.pdf contains schematics and assembly instructions.
Also you all can ignore RomeoUK "fake" statements because of that in http://pesn.com/2011/05/11/9501823_Romeros_Self-Sustaining_Muller_Dynamo_Drama/ :
"I had the impression that I live in a free country but it was demonstrated that anything is possible, we will never move forward.
I am an IT guy and I thought that I have a good brain but now after that I even forgot simple passwords and things I use every day, this is how scared I am", "All I had I posted free and it is better to be considered as not working." - for his own and his family safety because he was treatened.

So if you got your time and got stubborn wish to replicate Muller dynamo, everything is there. And that pdf caught my attention with squared sine wave oscillogram in not loaded generator coils which probably is the key to weakening Lenz forces. In conventional generators you always see pure sine wave just for comparison how different it is.

Good luck!

Scorch


Regarding sine wave; if I build a switching system that merely 'clips' the peaks off a conventional sine wave, from a conventional PM alternator, and store those peaks in a capacitor bank, with the intention of leaving the coils mostly saturated, therefore reducing Lenz, what might the sine wave look like?

Would the positive, and negative, peaks actually have 'flat tops' giving the appearance of a square wave from a pure sine alternator?

Just wondering anyway.

}:>



Quote from: T-1000 on May 08, 2013, 05:23:16 PM

So if you got your time and got stubborn wish to replicate Muller dynamo, everything is there. And that pdf caught my attention with squared sine wave oscillogram in not loaded generator coils which probably is the key to weakening Lenz forces. In conventional generators you always see pure sine wave just for comparison how different it is.

Good luck!

T-1000

Quote from: Scorch on May 08, 2013, 07:17:14 PM
Regarding sine wave; if I build a switching system that merely 'clips' the peaks off a conventional sine wave, from a conventional PM alternator, and store those peaks in a capacitor bank, with the intention of leaving the coils mostly saturated, therefore reducing Lenz, what might the sine wave look like?

Would the positive, and negative, peaks actually have 'flat tops' giving the appearance of a square wave from a pure sine alternator?

Just wondering anyway.

}:>

The squared sine wave on generator coils can appear only with one condition:
When magnetic field is non-linear in regards to coils there are steep angles where induction occurs. What I did find out on E. Leedskalnin generator topic - when 2 neodyium magnets are forced together with same poles they are making such non-linear magnetic field strength - the most powerfull on the junction of 2 magnets and very weak from the edge of each magnet...

Scorch

Managed to complete some more Q2 assembly this weekend.
Both pulse motor stator plates are now ready.
Did not use any super glue, or heat shrink, as suggested by the instructions or pictures.
I just used the holes provided to tie everything and maintained all solder connections next to coils on rotor side instead of back side.


That is all for now.

}:>

Scorch

Was preparing to attempt assembly of main bearing, and stator, plates and discovered that, once again, have run into a problem with incomplete machine work.
I already had problems with missing rotor shims as well as other incomplete machine work, on the rotor hubs, in which most of the bolt holes were not tapped all the way through.
I was able to use my own shims and finish that machine work, on the hubs, with my own tap.

But, now, I've discovered that eleven of the aluminum 'adjusting nuts' are also not tapped all the way through or not chased properly.
These nuts are a much larger size, and fine thread, and I do not have a tap to finish these.

Almost two months later and I have yet to receive the replacement shims.
Hope the company will deliver replacement nuts a little sooner.
Otherwise I will be inclined to special order the correct the tool to finish THEIR job for which I paid for and expected to be complete. . .

On another note-
These adjusting nuts have tapped holes and set screws to 'lock' the nuts in place.
Don't know why. Do not expect any vibration issues that may loosen hardware including these large nuts.
The set screws are nylon. Don't know how effective they may be or if there might be issues with plastic set screws getting stripped or rounded out.
Don't know if the nylon has been annealed, or tempered, which can make a difference in performance and hardness.

There are no details regarding this in the assembly instructions.
In fact; there is not any specifications at all regarding these 'adjustments' such as desired clearance between rotor and coils.

}:>