Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 59 Guests are viewing this topic.

nul-points

...just a quick thought, all

i suspect that the underlying 'principle' behind what we're seeing in this and other rotary devices, is the 'mechanical advantage' we can achieve by 'sliding' magnets (or energised coils) sideways into an aligned axis position, where we can then benefit from the rapid flux change event provided by the close & rapid location of a magnet and a core/coil

the inherent force of the magnet is able to provide work through the flux change event - all we have to do is to make sure that we minimise the work 'we' do in getting the magnet into & out of position

look at Rod's device - much of Romero's device is stripped away - Rod is only moving magnets past coil/core units

i believe both Rod & Romero are honestly presenting what they've found

Romero has shown us how to take it to a new level

if my thoughts here are correct, then we can find plenty other ways to do this


gotta run - give my love to khabe!  ;)
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

Pirate88179

I was thinking that possibly using a true earth ground, like Kapanadze, might allow other energy to enter the system and make self-running easier to obtain?  This is just an observation on my part, I know that Romero did not do this.  I was just thinking that this might help in jumping over the COP=1 barrier a little easier.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

khabe

Wheres different between Bedini and Ron´s machines? One is radial, another is axial, question about architecture, gives not any supernormal excellence.
You like you can built Bedini radial as outer rotor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nA2KtZ45nXA&feature=related
Muller built axial, just easy to have two row coils, more output coils with volumetric economy. Rectifiers after each coil or coils are grouped and then rectifiers ... matter of taste. Once rotor rotates cogging does not interfere anymore, especially when to look at Rom´s large air gaps. At that 9 coils vs 8 magnets is far not the only low cogging choice.
Someone offers to have outer ferrite tube additionally to inner ferrite rod?
Yeah ... when the same direction magnetic flux from outer and from inner side then what you´ll get from coil is zero  ::)
Elementary school physics  :o
cheers,
khabe


neptune

@ khabe . in your last reply , It is not clear if you believe that Bedini technology is OU .Or not OU .

khabe

Quote from: neptune on May 14, 2011, 06:11:25 AM
@ khabe . in your last reply , It is not clear if you believe that Bedini technology is OU .Or not OU .

Of course not OU,
Bedini is honest man,
he does not claim this is OU,
http://bedinimotors.blogspot.com/
cheers,
khabe