Muller Dynamo

[Magluvin]

Has anyone tried to see if their bifi coils have resonant freq? Harmonics there of?

Maybe my thoughts and ideas are not worth anything.

But the fact that spacing of the rotor, more than minimum, should be a good clue. We all know that more space in typical, means less output.

I have started a simple setup last night to test this. Im using a bifi coil that I made a couple years ago, 2 strand, that I had to modify for a ferrite core. Will be working on it tonight.  I put other things aside as I feel this is important enough to do so.  ;]
My coil is larger than recommended, size, inductance and ohms, but it should not matter to find what im looking for.

As for Romero not giving all details, I find that the bifi so far was the only thing held back as of late. ;]

On the bias mags, the washer. If you test, or look into it, the washer should almost negate most of the bias mags field to the coil. More of a mushrooming of the pole field, allowing the field an easy path back to the opposite pole.

So I see the bias mags effect as fairly weak, as compared to without the washer.  Not that it is part of any magic. But it is a field shaper.

If im correct with the bifi, the muller design with coils on each side of the rotor are not necessary.

Back later


Mags

[MasterPlaster]

<sup>Next, how do you think we should? There continues to possible?

We really had deified RomeroUK.</sup>

^{Stop following each other and the blind should not lead the blind.
There will be no help from RomeroUK. In fact anything he tells you must be treated with suspicion.
Ask yourself: this guy was scared shitless at some point and then he turned up here to help you again? How did he suddenly learn to become brave?
May be there are two Romeros, the coward one and a fake one.}

[teslaalset]

Ask yourself: this guy was scared shitless at some point and then he turned up here to help you again? How did he suddenly learn to become brave?
May be there are two Romeros, the coward one and a fake one.

That's why I earlier raised his trustworthyness.

Don't get me wrong, I still believe he has found something.
But, he realized that he probably would like to keep that for himself, rather that open source the whole lot of it.
His later behaviour (after he showed looping) indicates that in my view.
(remember him mentioning making a BIG MISTAKE, probably meaning showing his findings in public via YouTube and OU once he realized what he had achieved).
Some members are being used to divert us from the real thing, some of those don't even realize this and think what they evangelize is the ultimate way to go since they are being praised by RomeroUK for their "knowledge".

That's why I advised to stick to the basic concept earlier.
There are many variables not being tried yet in the basic concept.

[neptune]

@Webby one . Your work on motors sounds very interesting . But to fully understand what you are doing we need a lot more info .
1  What type of motors are you working with , I assume , DC brush type motors ,Though I could be wrong
2  Which part of the motor are you rewinding ? is this the armature [rotating part }?
3 In your second post you seem to be using the modified motor as a generator , being driven by another [unmodified ?] motor .If this is true , you need to provide a load for the generator , and measure the volts and amps whilst loaded . A suitable load could be a resistor having a similar resistance to that of the generator . Also , what is the input volts and amps of the motor driving the loaded generator .
     Your work could be very important given this extra info .

[Tudi]

<sup>I think we really should calm down now,
    RomeroUK from May 5 release of his unit so far, Many people tried a variety of methods, But: no one reproduction successfully.
    RomeroUK revealed to us in accordance with the data, Should be very detailed, He explains that he provides is complete data. RomeroUK did not say“I also keep the details of the key did not tell you”， Of course: He totally has the right to say so. But: He did not say, He clearly shows: He told us the complete data.
    If he provided the data is complete, We are so many people reproduction, At least there should be a person's success, But, in fact: We do not have a success!

    What does this mean?
    ----- RomeroUK device is really doubtful authenticity!
    We now use the“coil short”, Also used the“Bi-wire coil”，Also used many other means of，But we do not get good results, Of course, this is normal, Because the RM did not explain his use of these methods, From his video where he can not see the use of these methods. So our efforts are in vain.

Next, how do you think we should? There continues to possible?

We really had deified RomeroUK.</sup>

^{Not sure why you use "we". I personally only got to the part to buy magnets and wires . One of these days i will buy an osciloscope and build an efficient dynamo. Put it in a windturbine and get a few watts out of it. I value a lot what i read in this thread, lots of practical good advices. Keep on rolling.
I'm sorry you did not get rich by just reading the forums. Nobody handed you a ready to use device.}