Muller Dynamo

[konehead]

Here is video by guy in Sweden who gets a good speed up of shorted coil - I think these are aircores, not totally sure but assume so...he explains it very simple at end:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeXadyVSxj4

[T-1000]

Here is video by guy in Sweden who gets a good speed up of shorted coil - I think these are aircores, not totally sure but assume so...he explains it very simple at end:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeXadyVSxj4

The explanation in the end of this video might be a key to http://www.alexpetty.com/2009/11/24/the-secrets-of-edward-leedskalnin/ generator when lagging Lenz law is used to make usefull work! (the chained bottom looks like Leedskalnin PMH coil)

Cheers!

[i_ron]

hi Ron

That is what I am showing, a peak on approach and a peak on retreat with a single magnet going past a single coil.
and didoe plug circut should be in-synch with the peaks created.
where exactly the peak is going to be in relation to manget and coil postion -is dependent on the size of magnet vs coil rpms and if aircore or cored coil and ths proportions of those.
try my experiment with the 4 coils vs 2 N magnets with adjacent coil paris wired series-backwards and you will see why I drew that like I did.

Doug, that merely confuses the issue. No one here is using four coils and two magnets.

The way you have it drawn is wrong.



So no need to argue, just correct your drawing.

You have drawn a single magnet and a single coil yet put a wrong sinewave over it. Either put in the right sinewave or draw a single magnet passing over TWO adjacent coils reverse wired.

Regardless of which, they still obey Faraday's Law, as I have repeatedly stated.

This is just basic electrical theory (Faraday) and is your basic building block.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8za6EQQDNzk&NR=1



Ron

[konehead]

Hi Ron

I think you are looking at the sinewave sketch I drew above the magnet and coil, and you mentioned someting about the drawing has  "two neg peaks" next to the coils - maybe this is the confusion - that sinewave has nothing to do with anything really - it could be twice as big twice as small in realtion to coils and magents...

I just wanted to "show" a AC sinewave and then show there wil be a pos peak when magnet is in that entering-position in drawing, (approx) and there will be neg peak when magnet in is exiting-postion of 2nd drawing (approx) - and also when magnet is squared-up over the coil at TDC, that will be the 0 line. Thats how it works we are saying the same thing lets leave it be eh.

[i_ron]

Hi Ron

I think you are looking at the sinewave sketch I drew above the magnet and coil, and you mentioned someting about the drawing has  "two neg peaks" next to the coils - maybe this is the confusion - that sinewave has nothing to do with anything really - it could be twice as big twice as small in realtion to coils and magents...

I just wanted to "show" a AC sinewave and then show there wil be a pos peak when magnet is in that entering-position in drawing, (approx) and there will be neg peak when magnet in is exiting-postion of 2nd drawing (approx) - and also when magnet is squared-up over the coil at TDC, that will be the 0 line. Thats how it works we are saying the same thing lets leave it be eh.

Yes, why could you not have said that in the beginning? Why did I have to waste my time and that of all the other viewers?

What you have drawn is two same polarity peaks on each side of the coil and an opposite peak at TDC. This is deception. It matters.

Ron