Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Grimer]

The WhipMag acceleration is genuine.

The key to understanding is recognising the essential difference between GW and AGW rotation in terms of its implications for magnetic interaction; in recognising also why AGW rotation of the stators is relatively hard to obtain, relatively unstable, compared with GW rotation.

When you can see it the answer is painfully obvious.

In GW rotation the rotor is dragging the stators around. The magnetic fields are in attraction, in magnetic tension.

In AGW on the other hand the rotor is pushing the stator around. The magnetic fields are in repulsion, in magnetic compression.
.
. etc.

Grimer,

I agree with you about the AGW acceleration -- no brainer.

... Q:  Grimer, do you think a Searl effect within the stator could generate motive power (i.e. motion) instead of electrical?

To be perfectly honest I am unfamiliar with the Searl Effect so I'm in no position to give an opinion one way or the other. Sorry.

[Yadaraf]

Grimer,

OK, I'll let you slide on SEG.   

... Q:  Can you model the magnetic field in the bearing elements of a roller bearing that is surrounded by a magnetic flux and spinning 4700 RPM?

P.S. I have no clue.


Cheers   

Yada..
.

[Grimer]

Grimer,

OK, I'll let you slide on SEG.   

... Q:  Can you model the magnetic field in the bearing elements of a roller bearing that is surrounded by a magnetic flux and spinning 4700 RPM?

P.S. I have no clue.


Cheers   

Yada..
.

Nope. But the first thing necessary is to confirm that the AGW stator is in repulsion mode and the GW stators are in attraction mode. That may be a no-brainer for you but I doubt if it is for most members. 

[Yadaraf]

Grimer,

OK, I'll let you slide on SEG.   

... Q:  Can you model the magnetic field in the bearing elements of a roller bearing that is surrounded by a magnetic flux and spinning 4700 RPM?

P.S. I have no clue.


Cheers   

Yada..
.

Nope. But the first thing necessary is to confirm that the AGW stator is in repulsion mode and the GW stators are in attraction mode. That may be a no-brainer for you but I doubt if it is for most members. 

Thanks.  I don't know much about the Searl effect, so I guess I'll take this opportunity to learn. 

Cheers

Yada..
.

[ask]

Hi Everyone,

Please give some help on an idea of mine, I am a drop out from physics and have poor math skill.

?tron hypothesis

I thought, maybe there is a charged tiny thing exist and fill up the space (like ether). it is too small so we can not detect its mass/charge yet or it has no mass but only charge. Suppose it really exist and carry negative charge and its strength is like e/10^100 (let's call it ?tron).

Then, we can image ?trons attracted by nuclea and form a densed ball around it. And mean time ?trons repelled by electron and form an empty/loose ball around it. Because the nuclea and electron attracts each other, the two balls (one densed and one loosed ?tron ball) will attract each other and form atom. The rest of the space is still fill up with ?tron and its ?tron density is in between the two kind of balls.

In a light atom model, like H, we see two ?tron balls, one is the nuclea with densed ?trons around it, the other one is empty/loosed ?trons around electron. (kind of like an Earth sized beach ball float on Earth sized ocean. The ocean is the nuclea ball and the beach ball is the electron ball)

The H atom act as an dipole, has to marry another H to form H2 to be stable.

For a heavier atom model, like carbon, we see a denser nuclea ball with 6 electron balls around it.

In a very heavy atom, we see very densed nuclea ball with more layers of electron balls around it.

All the balls in all matters, act each other by electro force.

A magnet's structure is like many layers of atoms partially polarized, one direction is nuclear concentrated and the other direction is electron concentrated.

The electron concentrated plate (south pole) repells near by ?trons and form an empty/loose ?tron layer in space. This empty/loose layer will induce ?trons in the near by space to form a dense ?tron layer and so on so on. The dense/loose ?tron layers will attract each other to form magnetic field. The force strength is defined by the density of the ?tron in the field (1/R^3).

The nuclea concentrated plate (north pole) attracts ?tron and form a densed ?tron layer, it induce near by ?trons to form an empty/loose layer, the two layers attract each other and keep forming magnetic field.

Somehow, between matter/mass and matter, even the + - electrical charges are equal, it's net force is a weak attraction. The strength is defined by total charge (proportional to total mass) / R^2.

This is my best guase/explaination for gravity, magnetism and atom model.

Sorry about my poor English, be highly appreciate any comment/teaching/feedback.

Thanks ahead!