9/11: Anomalies at the WTC & the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Wood/Hutchison)

[CB_Brooklyn]

Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

by

Judy Wood and John Hutchison

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/


Excerpt:

=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.

These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.

The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as "The Hutchison Effect". The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with "field effects" for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.

The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================


My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist. It definitely DOES exist!

Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.



See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for upcoming interviews with Andrew Johnson where he will discuss the new paper. Also in the "news" section is a downloadable MP3 of an interview with John Hutchison.
http://drjudywood.com/#news


For proof that the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media, see my new article:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60


Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart:

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case


Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners don?t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=no_planer_resigns


What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:

Going in Search of Planes in NYC
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=134&Itemid=60


What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/trouble/73_230806wtc7.jpg

See here for more:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=trouble_with_jones#NBB


What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the Washington Post two and a half years before 9/11:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm



There were NO hijackings on 9/11.

There were NO plane crashes on 9/11.

The entire War On Terror is BOGUS.

[CB_Brooklyn]

PRESS RELEASE: Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel - On a Washington DC local radio station, WPFW, Scientists discuss true nature of destruction of WTC Complex on 9/11 and conclude it was related to a known effect:

http://www.prlog.org/10048184-scientists-see-wtc-hutchison-effect-parallel.html

[Red]

Mebe mebbe not.
Those planes you see are real, its just they are not the real planes.
The ability to remote a Boeing 747 was invented in Melbourne Australia back in 1978 by students of RMIT university, it was trailed and tested in Nevada. Case and point,. remote control of a Boeing jet liner and even automated landing systems are nearly 30 year old production standards before 9/11.

Second point, thermate was used to gently rock the towers into collapse as a sudden explosion would be obvious. You can see it in the videos of the day. The Battery banks that served standalone reserve power to the 81'st and 89'th? floors were replaced 3 days before 911 and never connected These were the primer for the softening core outer section that produced the initial collapse. From then the floors were blown every third floor. The basement was blown to conceal the 400 billion on gold that had been ferried away the 3 to 4 days before the attack, then again to drop the central core just a couple of inches to "crack" the joins using the buildings own rigidity. (Snap!!)

The last explosions were 5 floors above the deck to drop the central core columns into the pit created when the first explosion, before the collapse destroyed the 4 floors underground.

Now I don't know who you are but the ideas that there were no planes came from CIA plants to make the people who did know the truth look stupid and foolish. Are you trying to disprove a scientifically proven theory that can, in a court of law, become fact if it were ever to be given a chance? People that have a lifetime invested in Physics can show you over and over exactly what happened on that day. No super glue guns were used....

[utilitarian]

Sheeple, you both are total sheeple!  I cannot believe you both are so gullible as to believe that the towers actually existed.  Use your brain.  Connect the dots.  Everyone knows now that the towers were actually a hologram.  They never existed.  So some hologram planes were shown to run into the hologram buildings, and then we were shown some hologram explosions.  After this, there was a real explosion to leave a real crater.  And then they poured some debris over that - that is all.  Everyone knows this, so please do not even try to argue.

Remote control planes and death rays from space are just an invention of the CIA, who want to put crazy ideas out there that are easy to debunk.  You cannot debunk holograms - they can be turned off and there is no evidence of them ever again.

[ken_nyus]

Insanity, all of this crap.